You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Nick Pentreath (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/05 12:07:25 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-14379) Review spark.ml parity for recommendation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15226013#comment-15226013 ] 

Nick Pentreath edited comment on SPARK-14379 at 4/5/16 10:06 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

As per SPARK-13857, the missing methods are {{recommendProducts/recommendUsers}} and {{recommendProductsForUsers/recommendUsersForProducts}}. These can all be incorporated in an expanded {{transform}} method in ML.


was (Author: mlnick):
As per SPARK-13857, the missing methods are {{recommendProducts/recommendUsers}} and {{recommendProductsForUsers//recommendUsersForProducts}}. These can all be incorporated in an expanded {{transform}} method in ML.

> Review spark.ml parity for recommendation
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-14379
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14379
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ML
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Assignee: Nick Pentreath
>
> Review parity of spark.ml vs. spark.mllib to ensure spark.ml contains all functionality. List all missing items.
> This only covers Scala since we can compare Scala vs. Python in spark.ml itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org