You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by Gianluca Sartori <g....@elis.org> on 2003/10/22 18:00:31 UTC

Cocoon Forms or not?

Hi guys, 
It's only me.

I'm going ahead with my cocoon journey and I discover what Woody, now
Cocoon Forms, is. My question is: Did this framework reach a usable
stage? I'm going to use cocoon for the first time in a real-world
project. I'd like to know if Woody is for me or if I should turn to
another Form framework. If this is the case, which one do you suggest to
me?

Thanks for any help,
Gianluca


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org


RE: Cocoon Forms or not?

Posted by Reinhard Poetz <re...@apache.org>.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Noels [mailto:stevenn@outerthought.org] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 9:22 PM
> To: users@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Cocoon Forms or not?
> 
> 
> Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> 
> > I'm going ahead with my cocoon journey and I discover what 
> Woody, now 
> > Cocoon Forms, is. My question is: Did this framework reach a usable 
> > stage? I'm going to use cocoon for the first time in a real-world 
> > project. I'd like to know if Woody is for me or if I should turn to 
> > another Form framework. If this is the case, which one do 
> you suggest 
> > to me?
> 
> Being heavily biased of course, I'd only want to attest that 
> Woody/Cocoon Forms is very much usable in its current state, 

This is correct from an implementation POV but the interfaces
(namespaces, widget definitions) will change over the next few months.
If you are willing to follow the changes accordingly, Cocoon Forms (aka
Woody) is the best choice.

> but that, 
> should you want to make use of new features as-they-come-along, you 
> should be prepared to live off CVS HEAD for a while.

Yep.

Reinhard 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org


Re: Cocoon Forms or not?

Posted by Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org>.
Gianluca Sartori wrote:

> I'm going ahead with my cocoon journey and I discover what Woody, now
> Cocoon Forms, is. My question is: Did this framework reach a usable
> stage? I'm going to use cocoon for the first time in a real-world
> project. I'd like to know if Woody is for me or if I should turn to
> another Form framework. If this is the case, which one do you suggest to
> me?

Being heavily biased of course, I'd only want to attest that 
Woody/Cocoon Forms is very much usable in its current state, but that, 
should you want to make use of new features as-they-come-along, you 
should be prepared to live off CVS HEAD for a while.

HTH,

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source Java & XML            An Orixo Member
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org


Re: Cocoon Forms or not?

Posted by Christian Haul <ha...@informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>.
Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> Okay, thank you all, I think I'll go with the "FormValidatorActions". It
> seems to be the most documented. Unfortunally I don't have much time
> neither to follow Woody progress nor to try undocumented features.

If you really want to use plain HTML forms you should make sure to have 
a look at the forms sample coming with cocoon and in particular the 
SimpleFormTransformer and SimpleFormInstanceTransformer. They should 
ease this alot by (a) automatically filling a form from e.g. request 
parameters (b) include / exclude error tags corresponding to 
FormValidatorAction results and (c) provide a way to separate instance 
data from actual form.

	Chris.

-- 
C h r i s t i a n       H a u l
haul@informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
     fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837  7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org


Re: Cocoon Forms or not?

Posted by Gianluca Sartori <g....@elis.org>.
Okay, thank you all, I think I'll go with the "FormValidatorActions". It
seems to be the most documented. Unfortunally I don't have much time
neither to follow Woody progress nor to try undocumented features.

Of course the choice I've done is for the current project only. I'll
keep following Woody progresses.

If someone have to stop me from this choiche, please do it now before
it's too late :)

Gianluca

Il mer, 2003-10-22 alle 18:00, Gianluca Sartori ha scritto:
> Hi guys, 
> It's only me.
> 
> I'm going ahead with my cocoon journey and I discover what Woody, now
> Cocoon Forms, is. My question is: Did this framework reach a usable
> stage? I'm going to use cocoon for the first time in a real-world
> project. I'd like to know if Woody is for me or if I should turn to
> another Form framework. If this is the case, which one do you suggest to
> me?
> 
> Thanks for any help,
> Gianluca
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org