You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to github@beam.apache.org by "robertwb (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/07/10 16:13:59 UTC

[GitHub] [beam] robertwb commented on pull request #26332: Use plain Impulse rather than a full Read for 0, 1 element Creates.

robertwb commented on PR #26332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/26332#issuecomment-1629271292

   There was a test failure I needed to investigate, and it never got to the
   top of the "urgent" pile. I plan on wrapping this up now that I'm back from
   vacation.
   
   On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 8:08 AM Kenn Knowles ***@***.***>
   wrote:
   
   > Wasn't this demonstrated to have an improvement? I honestly thought this
   > had been merged.
   >
   > —
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/26332#issuecomment-1629161050>, or
   > unsubscribe
   > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADWVAOYQER2XR5I2PPJ5S3XPQLF3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAXDCAJGA>
   > .
   > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
   > ***@***.***>
   >
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscribe@beam.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org