You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by jbradfor <jb...@amfam.com> on 2010/09/01 19:53:53 UTC
Unmarshalling error - CXF 2.2.4 vs CXF 2.1.6
We use CXF for Providers and Consumers here.
We added a single optional element to a complex type (2.2.4), regened and
deployed our Provider.
All Consumers who are running 2.1.6 continue on without errors or incidents.
All Consumers who are running 2.2.4 started blowing up with UnMarshall
errors, no recognizing the new Optional element.
Why is this and is there any workaround?
This puts a real big slow down in our development process, since we have to
create a new MAJOR version (essentially a whole new service), versus making
our contract backward compatible.
--
View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Unmarshalling-error-CXF-2-2-4-vs-CXF-2-1-6-tp2799670p2799670.html
Sent from the cxf-issues mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Unmarshalling error - CXF 2.2.4 vs CXF 2.1.6
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
We need more info. What data binding is in use? Can we please see a stack trace?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:53 PM, jbradfor <jb...@amfam.com> wrote:
>
> We use CXF for Providers and Consumers here.
>
> We added a single optional element to a complex type (2.2.4), regened and
> deployed our Provider.
>
> All Consumers who are running 2.1.6 continue on without errors or incidents.
>
> All Consumers who are running 2.2.4 started blowing up with UnMarshall
> errors, no recognizing the new Optional element.
>
> Why is this and is there any workaround?
>
> This puts a real big slow down in our development process, since we have to
> create a new MAJOR version (essentially a whole new service), versus making
> our contract backward compatible.
> --
> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Unmarshalling-error-CXF-2-2-4-vs-CXF-2-1-6-tp2799670p2799670.html
> Sent from the cxf-issues mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Unmarshalling error - CXF 2.2.4 vs CXF 2.1.6
Posted by jbradfor <jb...@amfam.com>.
Post was answered here.
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Unmarshal-Error-CXF-2-1-6-vs-CXF-2-2-4-td2799836.html#a2799836
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Unmarshal-Error-CXF-2-1-6-vs-CXF-2-2-4-td2799836.html#a2799836
--
View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/Unmarshalling-error-CXF-2-2-4-vs-CXF-2-1-6-tp2799670p2799878.html
Sent from the cxf-issues mailing list archive at Nabble.com.