You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@solr.apache.org by Joel Bernstein <jo...@gmail.com> on 2023/05/18 14:03:11 UTC

Calling attention to SOLR-16807

I wanted to bring up SOLR-16807 (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16807) because its turning out
to be a pretty big thorn in my side at the moment. Enough so that I'm
considering proposing a bug fix release.

The issue is that a catch all (*) copyfield is incompatible with an index
that contains a DenseVectorField. On the surface this sounds not too bad,
but if you have an application that relies on a catch-all copy field this
becomes a blocker to using the DenseVector Field.