You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> on 2005/08/25 09:15:41 UTC
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?page=comments#action_12319976 ]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
----------------------------------------
Some additional info:
a. I used the following versions of jar files:
- activation-1.0.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
- mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard & console-ear:
sun_activation_version=1.0.2
sun_mail_version=1.3.2
c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and mail-1.3.2.jar under <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT\repository\sun\jars creating missing folders if needed
d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from: http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail portlet.
> Improve the Java Mail portlet
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-891
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
> Project: Geronimo
> Type: Improvement
> Components: console
> Versions: 1.0-M5
> Reporter: Chris Cardona
> Attachments: mailportlet.patch
>
> Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Thanks Chris!
Chris Cardona (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?page=comments#action_12319976 ]
>
>Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
>----------------------------------------
>
>Some additional info:
>
>a. I used the following versions of jar files:
>
>- activation-1.0.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
>- mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
>
>b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard & console-ear:
>
>sun_activation_version=1.0.2
>sun_mail_version=1.3.2
>
>c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and mail-1.3.2.jar under <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT\repository\sun\jars creating missing folders if needed
>
>d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from: http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail portlet.
>
>
>
>>Improve the Java Mail portlet
>>-----------------------------
>>
>> Key: GERONIMO-891
>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
>> Project: Geronimo
>> Type: Improvement
>> Components: console
>> Versions: 1.0-M5
>> Reporter: Chris Cardona
>> Attachments: mailportlet.patch
>>
>>Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn@earthlink.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose." -- Jim Elliot
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
On Aug 26, 2005, at 10:39 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Can we make "Removal of any Sun JAR dependencies" or not include the
> Java Mail and Portlet support a condition for the M5 release, since
> there are known legal problems with including them?
Well, they already are. Anything other than that is a mistake.
geir
>
>
> --- David Klavon <dk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
>>> They both require click-through licenses to download -
>>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
>>> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
>>>
>>
>>
>>> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>>> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> We are currently testing the JavaMail Portlet using the mail
>> provider
>> implementation that Geir placed in the sandbox. Once completed,
>> the
>> temporary Sun files won't be needed.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by Donald Woods <dr...@yahoo.com>.
Can we make "Removal of any Sun JAR dependencies" or not include the
Java Mail and Portlet support a condition for the M5 release, since
there are known legal problems with including them?
--- David Klavon <dk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Donald Woods wrote:
> > Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
> > They both require click-through licenses to download -
> > Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
> > JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
>
> > SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
> > JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
> >
> >
> We are currently testing the JavaMail Portlet using the mail
> provider
> implementation that Geir placed in the sandbox. Once completed,
> the
> temporary Sun files won't be needed.
>
> Dave
>
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by David Klavon <dk...@gmail.com>.
Donald Woods wrote:
> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
> They both require click-through licenses to download -
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>
>
We are currently testing the JavaMail Portlet using the mail provider
implementation that Geir placed in the sandbox. Once completed, the
temporary Sun files won't be needed.
Dave
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@4quarters.com>.
Ws should move the mail impl out of sandbox and into a mail module
for now, and into the JAMES project if we can :)
On Aug 26, 2005, at 8:23 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> To further clarify this for the original question:
>
> We introduced this manual way to configure JavaMail so that the
> admin portlet functionality could be demonstrated.
>
> We are working to resurrect the Geronimo JavaMail implementation
> and include that in the image.
>
> This JIRA reflects just a temporary state.
>
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>
>
>> No. That's why we re-wrote them.
>>
>> The part of the license is just one of the problems we have with
>> it. You are also required to indemnify Sun....
>>
>> geir
>>
>> On Aug 25, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
>>> They both require click-through licenses to download -
>>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
>>> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
>>> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>>> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>>>
>>> With concern around is the following Supplemental License passage
>>> compatiable with the Apache 2.0 License?
>>> 2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to
>>> the license granted in Section 1 (Software
>>> Internal Use and Development License Grant) of
>>> these Supplemental Terms, subject to the terms and
>>> conditions of this Agreement, including but not
>>> limited to, Section 3 (Java Technology
>>> Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun
>>> grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable,
>>> limited license to reproduce and distribute the
>>> Software in binary code form only, provided that
>>> you (i) distribute the Software complete and
>>> unmodified and only bundled as part of your
>>> Programs, (ii) do not distribute additional
>>> software intended to replace any component(s) of
>>> the Software, (iii) do not remove or alter any
>>> proprietary legends or notices contained in the
>>> Software, (iv) only distribute the Software
>>> subject to a license agreement that protects Sun's
>>> interests consistent with the terms contained in
>>> this Agreement, and (v) agree to defend and
>>> indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
>>> any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement
>>> amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys'
>>> fees) incurred in connection with any claim,
>>> lawsuit or action by any third party that arises
>>> or results from the use or distribution of any and
>>> all Programs and/or Software.
>>>
>>> Also, didn't Geronimo create its own JavaMail implementation?
>>>
>>> -Donald
>>>
>>> --- "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> [
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?
>>> page=comments#action_12319976
>>>
>>>
>>>> ]
>>>>
>>>> Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Some additional info:
>>>>
>>>> a. I used the following versions of jar files:
>>>>
>>>> - activation-1.0.2.jar > From
>>>> http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
>>>> - mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
>>>>
>>>> b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add
>>>> the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard &
>>>> console-ear:
>>>>
>>>> sun_activation_version=1.0.2
>>>> sun_mail_version=1.3.2
>>>>
>>>> c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and
>>>> mail-1.3.2.jar under
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
>>> \repository\sun\jars
>>>
>>>
>>>> creating missing folders if needed
>>>>
>>>> d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from:
>>>> http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration
>>>> and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail
>>>> portlet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Improve the Java Mail portlet
>>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Key: GERONIMO-891
>>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
>>>>> Project: Geronimo
>>>>> Type: Improvement
>>>>> Components: console
>>>>> Versions: 1.0-M5
>>>>> Reporter: Chris Cardona
>>>>> Attachments: mailportlet.patch
>>>>>
>>>>> Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> -
>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>>>> administrators:
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>>>> -
>>>> For more information on JIRA, see:
>>>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Joe Bohn joe.bohn@earthlink.net
>
> "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he
> cannot lose." -- Jim Elliot
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geir@optonline.net
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
To further clarify this for the original question:
We introduced this manual way to configure JavaMail so that the admin
portlet functionality could be demonstrated.
We are working to resurrect the Geronimo JavaMail implementation and
include that in the image.
This JIRA reflects just a temporary state.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> No. That's why we re-wrote them.
>
> The part of the license is just one of the problems we have with it.
> You are also required to indemnify Sun....
>
> geir
>
> On Aug 25, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
>> They both require click-through licenses to download -
>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
>> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
>> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>>
>> With concern around is the following Supplemental License passage
>> compatiable with the Apache 2.0 License?
>> 2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to
>> the license granted in Section 1 (Software
>> Internal Use and Development License Grant) of
>> these Supplemental Terms, subject to the terms and
>> conditions of this Agreement, including but not
>> limited to, Section 3 (Java Technology
>> Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun
>> grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable,
>> limited license to reproduce and distribute the
>> Software in binary code form only, provided that
>> you (i) distribute the Software complete and
>> unmodified and only bundled as part of your
>> Programs, (ii) do not distribute additional
>> software intended to replace any component(s) of
>> the Software, (iii) do not remove or alter any
>> proprietary legends or notices contained in the
>> Software, (iv) only distribute the Software
>> subject to a license agreement that protects Sun's
>> interests consistent with the terms contained in
>> this Agreement, and (v) agree to defend and
>> indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
>> any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement
>> amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys'
>> fees) incurred in connection with any claim,
>> lawsuit or action by any third party that arises
>> or results from the use or distribution of any and
>> all Programs and/or Software.
>>
>> Also, didn't Geronimo create its own JavaMail implementation?
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>> --- "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> [
>>>
>>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?
>> page=comments#action_12319976
>>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Some additional info:
>>>
>>> a. I used the following versions of jar files:
>>>
>>> - activation-1.0.2.jar > From
>>> http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
>>> - mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
>>>
>>> b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add
>>> the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard &
>>> console-ear:
>>>
>>> sun_activation_version=1.0.2
>>> sun_mail_version=1.3.2
>>>
>>> c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and
>>> mail-1.3.2.jar under
>>>
>>>
>> <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> \repository\sun\jars
>>
>>> creating missing folders if needed
>>>
>>> d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from:
>>> http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration
>>> and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail
>>> portlet.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Improve the Java Mail portlet
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Key: GERONIMO-891
>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
>>>> Project: Geronimo
>>>> Type: Improvement
>>>> Components: console
>>>> Versions: 1.0-M5
>>>> Reporter: Chris Cardona
>>>> Attachments: mailportlet.patch
>>>>
>>>> Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> -
>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>>> administrators:
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>>> -
>>> For more information on JIRA, see:
>>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>
--
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn@earthlink.net
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose." -- Jim Elliot
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
No. That's why we re-wrote them.
The part of the license is just one of the problems we have with it.
You are also required to indemnify Sun....
geir
On Aug 25, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
> They both require click-through licenses to download -
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>
> With concern around is the following Supplemental License passage
> compatiable with the Apache 2.0 License?
> 2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to
> the license granted in Section 1 (Software
> Internal Use and Development License Grant) of
> these Supplemental Terms, subject to the terms and
> conditions of this Agreement, including but not
> limited to, Section 3 (Java Technology
> Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun
> grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable,
> limited license to reproduce and distribute the
> Software in binary code form only, provided that
> you (i) distribute the Software complete and
> unmodified and only bundled as part of your
> Programs, (ii) do not distribute additional
> software intended to replace any component(s) of
> the Software, (iii) do not remove or alter any
> proprietary legends or notices contained in the
> Software, (iv) only distribute the Software
> subject to a license agreement that protects Sun's
> interests consistent with the terms contained in
> this Agreement, and (v) agree to defend and
> indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
> any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement
> amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys'
> fees) incurred in connection with any claim,
> lawsuit or action by any third party that arises
> or results from the use or distribution of any and
> all Programs and/or Software.
>
> Also, didn't Geronimo create its own JavaMail implementation?
>
> -Donald
>
> --- "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>> [
>>
>>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?
> page=comments#action_12319976
>
>> ]
>>
>> Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>> Some additional info:
>>
>> a. I used the following versions of jar files:
>>
>> - activation-1.0.2.jar > From
>> http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
>> - mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
>>
>> b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add
>> the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard &
>> console-ear:
>>
>> sun_activation_version=1.0.2
>> sun_mail_version=1.3.2
>>
>> c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and
>> mail-1.3.2.jar under
>>
>>
> <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
> \repository\sun\jars
>
>> creating missing folders if needed
>>
>> d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from:
>> http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration
>> and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail
>> portlet.
>>
>>
>>> Improve the Java Mail portlet
>>> -----------------------------
>>>
>>> Key: GERONIMO-891
>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
>>> Project: Geronimo
>>> Type: Improvement
>>> Components: console
>>> Versions: 1.0-M5
>>> Reporter: Chris Cardona
>>> Attachments: mailportlet.patch
>>>
>>> Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> -
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>> administrators:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>> -
>> For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
On Aug 26, 2005, at 8:38 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
> Another question is, does Sun distribute any mail code with
> glassfish, and if so, can we include that instead of the binary
> license
> below?
>
That's what I meant with CDDL in previous post. The jury is out on
distribution.
geir
> Aaron
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
>> They both require click-through licenses to download -
>> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
>> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
>> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>>
>> With concern around is the following Supplemental License passage
>> compatiable with the Apache 2.0 License?
>> 2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to
>> the license granted in Section 1 (Software
>> Internal Use and Development License Grant) of
>> these Supplemental Terms, subject to the terms and
>> conditions of this Agreement, including but not
>> limited to, Section 3 (Java Technology
>> Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun
>> grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable,
>> limited license to reproduce and distribute the
>> Software in binary code form only, provided that
>> you (i) distribute the Software complete and
>> unmodified and only bundled as part of your
>> Programs, (ii) do not distribute additional
>> software intended to replace any component(s) of
>> the Software, (iii) do not remove or alter any
>> proprietary legends or notices contained in the
>> Software, (iv) only distribute the Software
>> subject to a license agreement that protects Sun's
>> interests consistent with the terms contained in
>> this Agreement, and (v) agree to defend and
>> indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
>> any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement
>> amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys'
>> fees) incurred in connection with any claim,
>> lawsuit or action by any third party that arises
>> or results from the use or distribution of any and
>> all Programs and/or Software.
>>
>> Also, didn't Geronimo create its own JavaMail implementation?
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>> --- "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> [
>>>
>>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?
>> page=comments#action_12319976
>>
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Some additional info:
>>>
>>> a. I used the following versions of jar files:
>>>
>>> - activation-1.0.2.jar > From
>>> http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
>>> - mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
>>>
>>> b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add
>>> the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard &
>>> console-ear:
>>>
>>> sun_activation_version=1.0.2
>>> sun_mail_version=1.3.2
>>>
>>> c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and
>>> mail-1.3.2.jar under
>>>
>>>
>> <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> \repository\sun\jars
>>
>>> creating missing folders if needed
>>>
>>> d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from:
>>> http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration
>>> and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail
>>> portlet.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Improve the Java Mail portlet
>>>> -----------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Key: GERONIMO-891
>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
>>>> Project: Geronimo
>>>> Type: Improvement
>>>> Components: console
>>>> Versions: 1.0-M5
>>>> Reporter: Chris Cardona
>>>> Attachments: mailportlet.patch
>>>>
>>>> Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> -
>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>>> administrators:
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
>>> -
>>> For more information on JIRA, see:
>>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________
>> Do You Yahoo!?
>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>
>>
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>.
Another question is, does Sun distribute any mail code with
glassfish, and if so, can we include that instead of the binary license
below?
Aaron
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Donald Woods wrote:
> Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
> They both require click-through licenses to download -
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
> JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
> SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
> JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
>
> With concern around is the following Supplemental License passage
> compatiable with the Apache 2.0 License?
> 2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to
> the license granted in Section 1 (Software
> Internal Use and Development License Grant) of
> these Supplemental Terms, subject to the terms and
> conditions of this Agreement, including but not
> limited to, Section 3 (Java Technology
> Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun
> grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable,
> limited license to reproduce and distribute the
> Software in binary code form only, provided that
> you (i) distribute the Software complete and
> unmodified and only bundled as part of your
> Programs, (ii) do not distribute additional
> software intended to replace any component(s) of
> the Software, (iii) do not remove or alter any
> proprietary legends or notices contained in the
> Software, (iv) only distribute the Software
> subject to a license agreement that protects Sun's
> interests consistent with the terms contained in
> this Agreement, and (v) agree to defend and
> indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
> any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement
> amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys'
> fees) incurred in connection with any claim,
> lawsuit or action by any third party that arises
> or results from the use or distribution of any and
> all Programs and/or Software.
>
> Also, didn't Geronimo create its own JavaMail implementation?
>
> -Donald
>
> --- "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
>
> > [
> >
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?page=comments#action_12319976
> > ]
> >
> > Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
> > ----------------------------------------
> >
> > Some additional info:
> >
> > a. I used the following versions of jar files:
> >
> > - activation-1.0.2.jar > From
> > http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
> > - mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
> >
> > b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add
> > the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard &
> > console-ear:
> >
> > sun_activation_version=1.0.2
> > sun_mail_version=1.3.2
> >
> > c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and
> > mail-1.3.2.jar under
> >
> <geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT\repository\sun\jars
> > creating missing folders if needed
> >
> > d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from:
> > http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration
> > and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail
> > portlet.
> >
> > > Improve the Java Mail portlet
> > > -----------------------------
> > >
> > > Key: GERONIMO-891
> > > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
> > > Project: Geronimo
> > > Type: Improvement
> > > Components: console
> > > Versions: 1.0-M5
> > > Reporter: Chris Cardona
> > > Attachments: mailportlet.patch
> > >
> > > Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> > administrators:
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> > -
> > For more information on JIRA, see:
> > http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
Re: (GERONIMO-891) Improve the Java Mail portlet - Sun Jars?
Posted by Donald Woods <dr...@yahoo.com>.
Can these 2 JAR files be included in an Apache project?
They both require click-through licenses to download -
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Binary Code License Agreement
JAVABEANS(TM) ACTIVATION FRAMEWORK, VERSION 1.0.2 -
SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
JAVAMAIL, VERSION 1.3.2 - SUPPLEMENTAL LICENSE TERMS
With concern around is the following Supplemental License passage
compatiable with the Apache 2.0 License?
2. License to Distribute Software. In addition to
the license granted in Section 1 (Software
Internal Use and Development License Grant) of
these Supplemental Terms, subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, including but not
limited to, Section 3 (Java Technology
Restrictions) of these Supplemental Terms, Sun
grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable,
limited license to reproduce and distribute the
Software in binary code form only, provided that
you (i) distribute the Software complete and
unmodified and only bundled as part of your
Programs, (ii) do not distribute additional
software intended to replace any component(s) of
the Software, (iii) do not remove or alter any
proprietary legends or notices contained in the
Software, (iv) only distribute the Software
subject to a license agreement that protects Sun's
interests consistent with the terms contained in
this Agreement, and (v) agree to defend and
indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against
any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement
amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys'
fees) incurred in connection with any claim,
lawsuit or action by any third party that arises
or results from the use or distribution of any and
all Programs and/or Software.
Also, didn't Geronimo create its own JavaMail implementation?
-Donald
--- "Chris Cardona (JIRA)" <de...@geronimo.apache.org> wrote:
> [
>
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891?page=comments#action_12319976
> ]
>
> Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-891:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Some additional info:
>
> a. I used the following versions of jar files:
>
> - activation-1.0.2.jar > From
> http://java.sun.com/products/javabeans/glasgow/jaf.html
> - mail-1.3.2.jar > From http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/
>
> b. You can modify <geronimo_home>\etc\project.properties and add
> the ff. variables before you rebuild console-standard &
> console-ear:
>
> sun_activation_version=1.0.2
> sun_mail_version=1.3.2
>
> c. Before redeploying the console copy activation-1.0.2.jar and
> mail-1.3.2.jar under
>
<geronimo_home>\modules\assembly\target\geronimo-1.0-SNAPSHOT\repository\sun\jars
> creating missing folders if needed
>
> d. I used James v2.2.0 for my Mail Server. You can get it from:
> http://james.apache.org/ and run it using the default configuration
> and it should work when you send test emails from the JavaMail
> portlet.
>
> > Improve the Java Mail portlet
> > -----------------------------
> >
> > Key: GERONIMO-891
> > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-891
> > Project: Geronimo
> > Type: Improvement
> > Components: console
> > Versions: 1.0-M5
> > Reporter: Chris Cardona
> > Attachments: mailportlet.patch
> >
> > Update and improve the Java Mail portlet.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> administrators:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com