You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@aurora.apache.org by Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> on 2016/04/04 21:26:23 UTC
[DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1], it
looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and start
a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut the
release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate this
Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this discussion
thread. Thoughts, objections?
-Jake
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
Patch has landed - tests came up green on the new image. We're good to go!
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Nix that - i've updated the dev image, and have green e2e tests. I will
> have a go at merging 45177 tomorrow, provided green tests when applied.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Stephan - you could install jq within the vagrant provisioning as a
>> workaround in the meantime.
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Erb, Stephan <Stephan.Erb@blue-yonder.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Short heads up: I believe I might be blocking the release candidate
>>> right now :-/.
>>>
>>> * Goal was to get https://reviews.apache.org/r/45177/ merged
>>> * Before we can merge this, we need to rebuild of the vagrant base
>>> image due to this change https://reviews.apache.org/r/45782/
>>> * Unfortunately, I don't get to the e2e tests to pass in the newly
>>> generated image. I therefore don't feel comfortable pushing forward here
>>>
>>> I won't be able to look into this before Friday evening. Hopefully I get
>>> it resolved on Friday (unless someone else wants to have a look first)
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
>>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 23:14
>>> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> +1, fire away
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584
>>> [1], it
>>> >> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate
>>> and
>>> >> start
>>> >> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests
>>> or
>>> >> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and
>>> cut
>>> >> the
>>> >> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release
>>> candidate
>>> >> this
>>> >> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this
>>> discussion
>>> >> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > -Jake
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Zameer Manji
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
Nix that - i've updated the dev image, and have green e2e tests. I will
have a go at merging 45177 tomorrow, provided green tests when applied.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Stephan - you could install jq within the vagrant provisioning as a
> workaround in the meantime.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Erb, Stephan <St...@blue-yonder.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Short heads up: I believe I might be blocking the release candidate right
>> now :-/.
>>
>> * Goal was to get https://reviews.apache.org/r/45177/ merged
>> * Before we can merge this, we need to rebuild of the vagrant base image
>> due to this change https://reviews.apache.org/r/45782/
>> * Unfortunately, I don't get to the e2e tests to pass in the newly
>> generated image. I therefore don't feel comfortable pushing forward here
>>
>> I won't be able to look into this before Friday evening. Hopefully I get
>> it resolved on Friday (unless someone else wants to have a look first)
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 23:14
>> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1, fire away
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584
>> [1], it
>> >> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and
>> >> start
>> >> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
>> >> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and
>> cut
>> >> the
>> >> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release
>> candidate
>> >> this
>> >> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this
>> discussion
>> >> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
>> >> >
>> >> > -Jake
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Zameer Manji
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
Stephan - you could install jq within the vagrant provisioning as a
workaround in the meantime.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Erb, Stephan <St...@blue-yonder.com>
wrote:
> Short heads up: I believe I might be blocking the release candidate right
> now :-/.
>
> * Goal was to get https://reviews.apache.org/r/45177/ merged
> * Before we can merge this, we need to rebuild of the vagrant base image
> due to this change https://reviews.apache.org/r/45782/
> * Unfortunately, I don't get to the e2e tests to pass in the newly
> generated image. I therefore don't feel comfortable pushing forward here
>
> I won't be able to look into this before Friday evening. Hopefully I get
> it resolved on Friday (unless someone else wants to have a look first)
> ________________________________________
> From: Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 23:14
> To: dev@aurora.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> +1, fire away
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1],
> it
> >> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and
> >> start
> >> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
> >> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut
> >> the
> >> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate
> >> this
> >> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this
> discussion
> >> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
> >> >
> >> > -Jake
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Zameer Manji
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by "Erb, Stephan" <St...@blue-yonder.com>.
Short heads up: I believe I might be blocking the release candidate right now :-/.
* Goal was to get https://reviews.apache.org/r/45177/ merged
* Before we can merge this, we need to rebuild of the vagrant base image due to this change https://reviews.apache.org/r/45782/
* Unfortunately, I don't get to the e2e tests to pass in the newly generated image. I therefore don't feel comfortable pushing forward here
I won't be able to look into this before Friday evening. Hopefully I get it resolved on Friday (unless someone else wants to have a look first)
________________________________________
From: Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 23:14
To: dev@aurora.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
+1
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1, fire away
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1], it
>> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and
>> start
>> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
>> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut
>> the
>> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate
>> this
>> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this discussion
>> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
>> >
>> > -Jake
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Zameer Manji
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by Maxim Khutornenko <ma...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1, fire away
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1], it
>> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and
>> start
>> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
>> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut
>> the
>> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate
>> this
>> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this discussion
>> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
>> >
>> > -Jake
>> >
>> >
>> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Zameer Manji
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by Zameer Manji <zm...@apache.org>.
+1
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1, fire away
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1], it
> > looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and
> start
> > a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
> > patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut
> the
> > release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate
> this
> > Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this discussion
> > thread. Thoughts, objections?
> >
> > -Jake
> >
> >
> > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
> >
>
> --
> Zameer Manji
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS]: 0.13.0 release candidate
Posted by Bill Farner <wf...@apache.org>.
+1, fire away
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Jake Farrell <jf...@apache.org> wrote:
> Other than a couple deprecation clean up tickets, in AURORA-1584 [1], it
> looks like we are about ready to cut the 0.13.0 release candidate and start
> a vote. I wanted to open the floor up for any last minute requests or
> patches people would like to see make it in before we finalize and cut the
> release candidate. Currently planning on cutting the release candidate this
> Wednesday, April 6th, pending no blockers coming out of this discussion
> thread. Thoughts, objections?
>
> -Jake
>
>
> [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1584
>