You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@crunch.apache.org by Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com> on 2012/06/19 20:07:34 UTC
Process clarifications [Was: Compiler warnings in Crunch]
Still wading through code as I am new around here. Couple of questions about the process, more like clarifications to me on what the group already prefers:
- CTR or RTC: Seems like you already started off with CTR, will be good and light-weight for the shorter term.
- dev list or JIRA: Discussions and patches mostly on dev-list or on JIRA? JIRA is more useful in the long term, at scale.
Thanks,
+Vinod
On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote:
> Ok, down to 807 warnings (from about 1000) by my count -- I'll start
> cleaning up the raw type/generics warnings as well.
Re: Process clarifications [Was: Compiler warnings in Crunch]
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
FYI the JIRA issue has been resolved. afaik you should be good to
start using it.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4889
As people add patches Josh (and anyone else he adds as an admin) can
start adding new contributors.
Regards,
Patrick
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Josh Wills <jw...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
> <vi...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Still wading through code as I am new around here. Couple of questions about the process, more like clarifications to me on what the group already prefers:
>>
>> - CTR or RTC: Seems like you already started off with CTR, will be good and light-weight for the shorter term.
>
> I think CTR is fine for now given how small we are. Based on your
> experience, at what # of committers is it best to switch over?
>
>> - dev list or JIRA: Discussions and patches mostly on dev-list or on JIRA? JIRA is more useful in the long term, at scale.
>
> We'll go JIRA as soon as it is up. We have a ton of stuff in flight
> right now and it will be good to get it all tracked.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, down to 807 warnings (from about 1000) by my count -- I'll start
>>> cleaning up the raw type/generics warnings as well.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Director of Data Science
> Cloudera
> Twitter: @josh_wills
Re: Process clarifications [Was: Compiler warnings in Crunch]
Posted by Josh Wills <jw...@cloudera.com>.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
<vi...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>
> Still wading through code as I am new around here. Couple of questions about the process, more like clarifications to me on what the group already prefers:
>
> - CTR or RTC: Seems like you already started off with CTR, will be good and light-weight for the shorter term.
I think CTR is fine for now given how small we are. Based on your
experience, at what # of committers is it best to switch over?
> - dev list or JIRA: Discussions and patches mostly on dev-list or on JIRA? JIRA is more useful in the long term, at scale.
We'll go JIRA as soon as it is up. We have a ton of stuff in flight
right now and it will be good to get it all tracked.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote:
>
>> Ok, down to 807 warnings (from about 1000) by my count -- I'll start
>> cleaning up the raw type/generics warnings as well.
>
--
Director of Data Science
Cloudera
Twitter: @josh_wills
Re: Process clarifications [Was: Compiler warnings in Crunch]
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
In progress. Watch this for updates:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4889
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Robert Chu <ro...@wibidata.com> wrote:
> Also a related question: What the status of the crunch JIRA?
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Still wading through code as I am new around here. Couple of questions
>> about the process, more like clarifications to me on what the group already
>> prefers:
>>
>> - CTR or RTC: Seems like you already started off with CTR, will be good
>> and light-weight for the shorter term.
>> - dev list or JIRA: Discussions and patches mostly on dev-list or on
>> JIRA? JIRA is more useful in the long term, at scale.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, down to 807 warnings (from about 1000) by my count -- I'll start
>> > cleaning up the raw type/generics warnings as well.
>>
>>
Re: Process clarifications [Was: Compiler warnings in Crunch]
Posted by Robert Chu <ro...@wibidata.com>.
Also a related question: What the status of the crunch JIRA?
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>
> Still wading through code as I am new around here. Couple of questions
> about the process, more like clarifications to me on what the group already
> prefers:
>
> - CTR or RTC: Seems like you already started off with CTR, will be good
> and light-weight for the shorter term.
> - dev list or JIRA: Discussions and patches mostly on dev-list or on
> JIRA? JIRA is more useful in the long term, at scale.
>
> Thanks,
> +Vinod
>
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:23 AM, Gabriel Reid wrote:
>
> > Ok, down to 807 warnings (from about 1000) by my count -- I'll start
> > cleaning up the raw type/generics warnings as well.
>
>