You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@lucene.apache.org by gs...@apache.org on 2011/05/16 14:08:42 UTC
svn commit: r1103708 -
/lucene/board-reports/2011/special-board-report-may.txt
Author: gsingers
Date: Mon May 16 12:08:42 2011
New Revision: 1103708
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1103708&view=rev
Log:
more edits
Modified:
lucene/board-reports/2011/special-board-report-may.txt
Modified: lucene/board-reports/2011/special-board-report-may.txt
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/board-reports/2011/special-board-report-may.txt?rev=1103708&r1=1103707&r2=1103708&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- lucene/board-reports/2011/special-board-report-may.txt (original)
+++ lucene/board-reports/2011/special-board-report-may.txt Mon May 16 12:08:42 2011
@@ -41,9 +41,11 @@ during the recent debates, it is quite c
are free to have independent viewpoints on what to do. Naturally,
given a number of committers in one company, it warrants the PMC
keep a watchful eye on it. Likewise, however, it should also
-be clear that every PMC/committer involved in Lucene is paid to
+be clear that every PMC/committer involved in Lucene (with the
+exception of Andi Vajda) is paid to
work on Lucene/Solr and they all have financial interests. All
-should recognize that this doesn't necessarily make for problems.
+should recognize that this doesn't necessarily make for problems, but
+can do so if people let it.
Beyond this, we have put forth a few other things that we can
do to help keep the community moving forward in a positive way.