You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by bl...@apache.org on 2012/02/05 20:49:52 UTC

svn commit: r1240787 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Author: blair
Date: Sun Feb  5 19:49:52 2012
New Revision: 1240787

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1240787&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Move r1240752 to the approved section.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1240787&r1=1240786&r2=1240787&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Sun Feb  5 19:49:52 2012
@@ -84,18 +84,6 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: rhuijben, philip
 
- * r1240752
-   Workround for a faulty APR truncate() implementation. When rep sharing
-   has been activated on FSFS repositories, a rep will be truncated from
-   the file after it has been found to be a duplicate of some existing rep.
-   If this happens high up in the tree (in the root folder, preferrably),
-   not enough data may be written afterwards (parent directories + list
-   of changes in that revision) to fully overwrite the stale rep content.
-   Justification:
-     Rare but real source of corruption.
-   Votes:
-     +1: stefan2, danielsh, blair
-
 Veto-blocked changes:
 =====================
 
@@ -140,3 +128,14 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
 Approved changes:
 =================
 
+ * r1240752
+   Workround for a faulty APR truncate() implementation. When rep sharing
+   has been activated on FSFS repositories, a rep will be truncated from
+   the file after it has been found to be a duplicate of some existing rep.
+   If this happens high up in the tree (in the root folder, preferrably),
+   not enough data may be written afterwards (parent directories + list
+   of changes in that revision) to fully overwrite the stale rep content.
+   Justification:
+     Rare but real source of corruption.
+   Votes:
+     +1: stefan2, danielsh, blair