You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/28 15:39:49 UTC
Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it
been implemented? Is it complete?
Ankush
Re: Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
Posted by Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>.
Thank you so much for this Angela. I need for a client for WebDAV, so no
need to file the request.
Again much thanks
Ankush Mishra
On 13 May 2016 15:21, "Angela Schreiber" <an...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Hi Ankush
>
> As far as I remember that status is as follows:
>
> - The library in the jackrabbit-webdav module is more or less complete
> wrt RFC 3744
>
> - The webdav implementation on top of a JCR repository
> as present in jackrabbit-jcr-server (see webdav package therein)
> doesn't yet support that functionality i.e. doesn't map
> RFC 3744 to the corresponding JCR calls. The only thing that
> is available so far are 2 privilege related dav-properties.
>
>
> So, if you want to make use of the library in jackrabbit-webdav to
> build your own webdav server it should be feasible to include RFC 3744.
>
> If you want to use the webdav server implementation shipped
> with Jackrabbit (jcr-server module) and need support for RFC 3744,
> you have to file feature request and see if someone in the
> project team or in the community makes a contributions. Obviously
> you are welcome to contribute yourself.
>
> Kind regards
> Angela
>
>
> On 08/05/16 13:37, "Ankush Mishra" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Just bumping up this thread, and still wondering on the status of this?
> >
> >Ankush Mishra
> >
> >On 30-04-2016 05:16, Christopher Rockwell wrote:
> >> I am out of the office until 5/9/2016.
> >>
> >> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks for the response, but according to this page here:
> >>
> >>
> https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/components/jackrabbit-webdav-library.ht
> >>ml
> >>
> >>
> >> It states:
> >>
> >> The following RFCs have been integrated:
> >>
> >> RFC 4918 (WebDAV - HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring,
> >> obsoleting RFC 2518)
> >> RFC 3253 (DeltaV - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV)
> >> RFC 3648 (Ordered Collections Protocol)
> >> *RFC 3744 (Access Control Protocol)*
> >> RFC 5323 (WebDAV SEARCH; previously DASL - DAV Searching and
> >> Locating)
> >>
> >> Also, there seems to be a package
> >> org.apache.jackrabbit.webdav.security, which seems to be the
> >> implementation of it. The Javadoc on the package can be found
> >> here:
> >>
> >>
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/1.4/org/apache/jackrabbit/webdav/securit
> >>y/package-summary.html
> >>
> >> Just not sure till what extent is it complete?
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot. Any help is appreciated.
> >>
> >> Ankush
> >>
> >> On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:36 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> >> On 2016-04-28 15:39, Ankush Mishra wrote:
> >> I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
> >> jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it
> >> been implemented? Is it complete?
> >>
> >> Ankush
> >>
> >> As far as I recall, it's not implemented at all.
> >>
> >> Best regards, Julian
> >>
> >>
> >
> >--
> >Ankush Mishra
> >
>
>
Re: Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
Posted by Angela Schreiber <an...@adobe.com>.
Hi Ankush
As far as I remember that status is as follows:
- The library in the jackrabbit-webdav module is more or less complete
wrt RFC 3744
- The webdav implementation on top of a JCR repository
as present in jackrabbit-jcr-server (see webdav package therein)
doesn't yet support that functionality i.e. doesn't map
RFC 3744 to the corresponding JCR calls. The only thing that
is available so far are 2 privilege related dav-properties.
So, if you want to make use of the library in jackrabbit-webdav to
build your own webdav server it should be feasible to include RFC 3744.
If you want to use the webdav server implementation shipped
with Jackrabbit (jcr-server module) and need support for RFC 3744,
you have to file feature request and see if someone in the
project team or in the community makes a contributions. Obviously
you are welcome to contribute yourself.
Kind regards
Angela
On 08/05/16 13:37, "Ankush Mishra" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Just bumping up this thread, and still wondering on the status of this?
>
>Ankush Mishra
>
>On 30-04-2016 05:16, Christopher Rockwell wrote:
>> I am out of the office until 5/9/2016.
>>
>> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the response, but according to this page here:
>>
>>https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/components/jackrabbit-webdav-library.ht
>>ml
>>
>>
>> It states:
>>
>> The following RFCs have been integrated:
>>
>> RFC 4918 (WebDAV - HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring,
>> obsoleting RFC 2518)
>> RFC 3253 (DeltaV - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV)
>> RFC 3648 (Ordered Collections Protocol)
>> *RFC 3744 (Access Control Protocol)*
>> RFC 5323 (WebDAV SEARCH; previously DASL - DAV Searching and
>> Locating)
>>
>> Also, there seems to be a package
>> org.apache.jackrabbit.webdav.security, which seems to be the
>> implementation of it. The Javadoc on the package can be found
>> here:
>>
>>http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/1.4/org/apache/jackrabbit/webdav/securit
>>y/package-summary.html
>>
>> Just not sure till what extent is it complete?
>>
>> Thanks a lot. Any help is appreciated.
>>
>> Ankush
>>
>> On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:36 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>> On 2016-04-28 15:39, Ankush Mishra wrote:
>> I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
>> jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it
>> been implemented? Is it complete?
>>
>> Ankush
>>
>> As far as I recall, it's not implemented at all.
>>
>> Best regards, Julian
>>
>>
>
>--
>Ankush Mishra
>
Re: Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
Posted by Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>.
Just bumping up this thread, and still wondering on the status of this?
Ankush Mishra
On 30-04-2016 05:16, Christopher Rockwell wrote:
> I am out of the office until 5/9/2016.
>
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the response, but according to this page here:
> https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/components/jackrabbit-webdav-library.html
>
>
> It states:
>
> The following RFCs have been integrated:
>
> RFC 4918 (WebDAV - HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring,
> obsoleting RFC 2518)
> RFC 3253 (DeltaV - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV)
> RFC 3648 (Ordered Collections Protocol)
> *RFC 3744 (Access Control Protocol)*
> RFC 5323 (WebDAV SEARCH; previously DASL - DAV Searching and
> Locating)
>
> Also, there seems to be a package
> org.apache.jackrabbit.webdav.security, which seems to be the
> implementation of it. The Javadoc on the package can be found
> here:
> http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/1.4/org/apache/jackrabbit/webdav/security/package-summary.html
>
> Just not sure till what extent is it complete?
>
> Thanks a lot. Any help is appreciated.
>
> Ankush
>
> On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:36 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2016-04-28 15:39, Ankush Mishra wrote:
> I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
> jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it
> been implemented? Is it complete?
>
> Ankush
>
> As far as I recall, it's not implemented at all.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
>
--
Ankush Mishra
Re: Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
Posted by Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the response, but according to this page here:
https://jackrabbit.apache.org/jcr/components/jackrabbit-webdav-library.html
It states:
The following RFCs have been integrated:
RFC 4918 (WebDAV - HTTP Extensions for Distributed Authoring,
obsoleting RFC 2518)
RFC 3253 (DeltaV - Versioning Extensions to WebDAV)
RFC 3648 (Ordered Collections Protocol)
*RFC 3744 (Access Control Protocol)*
RFC 5323 (WebDAV SEARCH; previously DASL - DAV Searching and
Locating)
Also, there seems to be a package org.apache.jackrabbit.webdav.security,
which seems to be the implementation of it. The Javadoc on the package
can be found here:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/api/1.4/org/apache/jackrabbit/webdav/security/package-summary.html
Just not sure till what extent is it complete?
Thanks a lot. Any help is appreciated.
Ankush
On Thursday 28 April 2016 07:36 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2016-04-28 15:39, Ankush Mishra wrote:
>> I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
>> jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it
>> been implemented? Is it complete?
>>
>> Ankush
>
> As far as I recall, it's not implemented at all.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
Re: Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2016-04-28 15:39, Ankush Mishra wrote:
> I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
> jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it
> been implemented? Is it complete?
>
> Ankush
As far as I recall, it's not implemented at all.
Best regards, Julian
Re: Current status of the Jackrabbit WebDAV ACL
Posted by Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>.
Looking forward to your response.
Ankush Mishra
On 30 Apr 2016 05:16, "Christopher Rockwell" <cm...@umich.edu> wrote:
> I am out of the office until 5/9/2016.
>
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 9:39 AM, Ankush Mishra <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I was wondering about the current status of implementation of
> jackrabbit-webdav's Access Control Protocol, till what extent has it been
> implemented? Is it complete?
> >
> > Ankush
>