You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zeppelin.apache.org by zjffdu <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/02/02 03:56:35 UTC

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2760: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppe...

GitHub user zjffdu opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760

    [WIP] ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

    ### What is this PR for?
    A few sentences describing the overall goals of the pull request's commits.
    First time? Check out the contributing guide - https://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html
    
    
    ### What type of PR is it?
    [Bug Fix | Improvement | Feature | Documentation | Hot Fix | Refactoring]
    
    ### Todos
    * [ ] - Task
    
    ### What is the Jira issue?
    * Open an issue on Jira https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN/
    * Put link here, and add [ZEPPELIN-*Jira number*] in PR title, eg. [ZEPPELIN-533]
    
    ### How should this be tested?
    * First time? Setup Travis CI as described on https://zeppelin.apache.org/contribution/contributions.html#continuous-integration
    * Strongly recommended: add automated unit tests for any new or changed behavior
    * Outline any manual steps to test the PR here.
    
    ### Screenshots (if appropriate)
    
    ### Questions:
    * Does the licenses files need update?
    * Is there breaking changes for older versions?
    * Does this needs documentation?


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/zjffdu/zeppelin ZEPPELIN-3196

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2760
    
----
commit ad3233ab4e6c670a9e1ddc275aed7b810caa22ac
Author: Jeff Zhang <zj...@...>
Date:   2018-01-31T11:46:44Z

    ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

----


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by Tagar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user Tagar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    I wonder if https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2945 fixes issue I described in my earlier comment.
    cc @cvaliente @myuwono 


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by zjffdu <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    `IS_ZEPPELIN_TEST` is used for unit test for PluginManager. e.g. In NotebookRepoSyncInitializationTest, VFSNotebookRepoMock is just for testing, so could be constructed from classpath directly.  


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by jongyoul <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    @zjffdu I have a simple question. You introduced `IS_ZEPPELIN_TEST` but how can we use it? do we need to all jars into classpath manually to use `IS_ZEPPELIN_TEST`?


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by myuwono <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user myuwono commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    @Tagar yep! I have it in my private fork for the ServiceLoader fix. Eagerly waiting for the PR to get merged to master. 


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by zjffdu <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    @Leemoonsoo @jongyoul @prabhjyotsingh @felixcheung Could you help review it ? Thanks, it is for 0.9. 


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by Leemoonsoo <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    Took a look changes and it looks good to me


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by zjffdu <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    Thanks for review, will merge soon


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Eng...

Posted by zjffdu <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    I haven't updated the description, will do that after the PR is ready, It is still WIP 


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: [WIP] ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Eng...

Posted by masyan <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user masyan commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    @zjffdu 
    a strange description of PR )


---

[GitHub] zeppelin issue #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin Engine

Posted by Tagar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user Tagar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760
  
    @zjffdu, just updated to master, and noticed versioning toolbar is missing...
    I think it's because of this PR.
    We have `zeppelin.notebook.storage`=`org.apache.zeppelin.notebook.repo.GitNotebookRepo` in `zeppelin-site.xml` .. is there is some additional setting required now, 
    or perhaps Zeppelin now has to be build differently? 
    Thanks!


---

[GitHub] zeppelin pull request #2760: ZEPPELIN-3196. Plugin framework for Zeppelin En...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/2760


---