Re: Fuseki 2.0 configuration issues

[Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>]

On 29/08/15 15:39, Adrian Gschwend wrote:
> On 25.08.15 14:06, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Hi Andy,
>
>> The problem is that the configuration of the "bfs" dataset is picked up
>> from the configuration database.  Presumably you created it through the UI.
>
> I did! Thanks a lot for the hint. Is this somewhere written in the
> documentation? I know that I am not the only one who was running into
> that, I've seen similar questions outside the mailinglist.

Putting it in the system database didn't turn out a good idea hence the 
change at 2.3.0 (I can see now Fuseki would have to add editing 
configuration file capabilities which would be nice but is distinctly 
non-trivial).

What I still don't completely understand is why some people come across 
this and not others.  Makes writing useful document tricky!

	Andy

>> That has an assembler that has a timeout of 3000ms for that dataset.
>>
>> In Fuseki v2.3.0, UI created databases don't go into the system database
>> any more - they go into run/configuration/ as turtle so they are easier
>> to edit.
>>
>> You can either edit, with SPARQL Update, the system database or,
>> simpler, delete the system database entirely (it only had one assembler
>> in it) and put a file in run/configuration/.
>>
>> There is one for bfs below I used in testing, with your database
>> location in it.. It also has all the unnecessary initialization stuff
>> removed that is no longer needed for Fuseki 2.3 + TDB. After all, Fuseki
>> itself uses TDB so TDB setup and writing for assemblers happens anyway.
>
> great tnx, will work with this one!
>
> regards
>
> Adrian
>