Move discussions to geronimo-dev@ (Re: JSR 109 implementation for Apache)

[Davanum Srinivas <di...@apache.org>]

Everyone interested....PLEASE join geronimo-dev list. It's time to move the discussions to just
that mailing list. Please don't CC individuals. Please don't involve axis-user as it is just a
user group. If and when axis-dev involvement is needed, you can CC that mailing list.

Thanks,
dims

--- Srinath Perera <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
> sorry if I give a false hope ...it was archtecture I was explainig. Code
> is not written yet be have fairly good idea what to done and the
> architecture.(I belive)  We will start writing it once the discussion
> done.
> 
> Srinath
> 
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 09:29, Richard Monson-Haefel wrote:
> > Sounds interesting. Is the code available somewhere for us to look at?
> > 
> > On 10/22/03 5:41 AM, "Srinath Perera" <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Dims,
> > > 
> > > we agree the changes to axis should be minimal (preferably no changes.)
> > > 
> > > How we thought about the project is like this ....
> > > 
> > > 1) JSR109 implementation is a tool in axis(like WSDL2Java) which
> > > generates a web service that wraps the J2EE components.(a web service
> > > that do the lookup and map webservice  SEI methods to the EJB ...etc )
> > > It creates a web service that wrap the EJB using the WSDL and the
> > > webservice.xml  
> > > 
> > > 2)It needs minimal changes to axis (our code is a tool just like
> > > WSDL2Java lets say WSDL2J2EE or something).
> > > 
> > > 3) with this tool the axis become JSR109 compliant and the J2EE
> > > container is Geronimo.
> > > 
> > > In that case we prefer to stay close with axis. just like a tool
> > > (independent piece of code) :)
> > > 
> > > Srianth
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 16:01, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > >> Srinath,
> > >> 
> > >> The more i think about this, the more i am convinced that most of the work
> > >> should be done in
> > >> geronimo  with minimum changes to axis itself. Since there needs to be tight
> > >> integration with
> > >> Geronimo and the target is to provide a 109 impl for geronimo.
> > >> 
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> dims
> > >> 
> > >> --- Srinath Perera <he...@vijayaba.cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote:
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>> 
> > >>> There is a wiki proposal page created for the JSR109 implementation.
> > >>> it can be found by url
> > >>> 
> > >>> http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JSR109Proposal
> > >>> 
> > >>> Srinath 
> > >>> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> =====
> > >> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> > >> 
> > > 
> 
> 


=====
Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/