You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> on 2006/11/13 23:11:13 UTC
[VOTE] remove RequiredTextField in 2.0/1.3
To cut down on our API and remove some ultra-convenience stuff, I
propose to remove RequiredTextField from our API. Requiredness is
easily achieved using 'setRequired(true)', and therefore removes the
need for a special field.
[ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 and 1.3
[ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 only
[ ] no, but move it to wicket-extensions
[ ] no, I'm very attached to RequiredTextField and would keep it where it is.
Martijn
--
<a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a>
at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
the World!</a>
Re: [VOTE] remove RequiredTextField in 2.0/1.3
Posted by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com>.
>
> [x] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 only
>
-igor
Re: [VOTE] remove RequiredTextField in 2.0/1.3
Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.
[ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 and 1.3
[ x ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 only
[ ] no, but move it to wicket-extensions
[ ] no, I'm very attached to RequiredTextField and would keep it where it is.
I see no advantage to removing it from 1.3 as well; it'll only make
upgrading harder for users.
Eelco
Re: Re: [VOTE] remove RequiredTextField in 2.0/1.3
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
Summary:
The general consensus is to remove the RequiredTextfield only in 2.0
Final vote:
- remove in 2.0 only: 3 binding
Martijn
On 11/14/06, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> remove in 2.0 only.
>
>
> On 11/13/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > To cut down on our API and remove some ultra-convenience stuff, I
> > propose to remove RequiredTextField from our API. Requiredness is
> > easily achieved using 'setRequired(true)', and therefore removes the
> > need for a special field.
> >
> > [ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 and 1.3
> > [ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 only
> > [ ] no, but move it to wicket-extensions
> > [ ] no, I'm very attached to RequiredTextField and would keep it where it
> > is.
> >
> > Martijn
> > --
> > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > ">Wicket</a>
> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> > the World!</a>
> >
>
>
--
<a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket">Wicket</a>
at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
the World!</a>
Re: [VOTE] remove RequiredTextField in 2.0/1.3
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
remove in 2.0 only.
On 11/13/06, Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> To cut down on our API and remove some ultra-convenience stuff, I
> propose to remove RequiredTextField from our API. Requiredness is
> easily achieved using 'setRequired(true)', and therefore removes the
> need for a special field.
>
> [ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 and 1.3
> [ ] yes remove RequiredTextField in 2.0 only
> [ ] no, but move it to wicket-extensions
> [ ] no, I'm very attached to RequiredTextField and would keep it where it
> is.
>
> Martijn
> --
> <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket">Vote</a>
> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> ">Wicket</a>
> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/">Best Stuff in
> the World!</a>
>