You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@stdcxx.apache.org by "Martin Sebor (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/01/24 04:18:35 UTC

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-240) #define _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS when exceptions are disabled via command line option

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12561929#action_12561929 ] 

Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-240:
-------------------------------------

Looks like the ___HPACC_NOEH macro has been removed sometime during the 8 years between the request was filed and now:

{noformat}
$ aCC -V +noeh t.cpp && ./a.out && aCC +eh t.cpp && ./a.out
aCC: HP C/aC++ B3910B A.06.14 [Feb 22 2007]
ld: 92453-07 linker ld HP Itanium(R) B.12.43  IPF/IPF
___HPACC_NOEH NOT #defined
___HPACC_NOEH NOT #defined
{noformat}

> #define _RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS when exceptions are disabled via command line option
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STDCXX-240
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240
>             Project: C++ Standard Library
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4
>            Reporter: Martin Sebor
>            Assignee: Travis Vitek
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 4.2.1
>
>         Attachments: stdcxx-240-vacpp60.patch, stdcxx-240.patch
>
>
> Moved from the Rogue Wave bug tracking database:
> Class/File: stdcomp.h
> Fix Priority: Can Fix
> Long Description: 
>   *** Dec 1 1999 6:03PM *** sebor ***
> A request for enhancement.
> Subject: define RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS when __HPACC_NOEH is
> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 17:11:36 -0800
> From: Chichiang Wan <wa...@cup.hp.com>
> Organization: California Language Labs
> To: oemsupport <oe...@roguewave.com>
> CC: dhandly@cup.hp.com, wanc_at_hp <wa...@cup.hp.com>
> aCC has an option +noeh.  When it is provided, __HPACC_NOEH will be
> defined.  It would be nice for users to need to only use +noeh.  For
> that,  
> RWSTD_NO_EXCEPTIONS needs to be defined conditionally. 
> =========================================================
> $ cat test.C
> #include <string>
> $ aCC +noeh -c test.C
> Error 46: "/opt/aCC/include/memory", line 493 # Exception handling is 
> not
>     enabled (do not use the +noeh flag to aCC).
>       RWSTD_THROW_NO_MSG(tmp == 0, bad_alloc);
> -- Chichiang
> ****Modified By: sebor @ May 29, 2000 10:28:25 PM****
> We should do this AND test it -- not just on aCC but in general with all compilers that support this feature.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.