FYI: Vote for xml-sec 1.4.2 is on

[Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <na...@gmail.com>]

Vote [1] for xml-sec 1.4.2 is on and I am planning to test it with Rampart
trunk over the weekend. We may be able to get xml-sec 1.4.2 signed artifacts
to central repository this time, so we may even be able to move to xml-sec
1.4.2 in next WSS4J version if everything works fine with xml-sec 1.4.2 .
Can someone from CXF also do the testing with xml-sec 1.4.2 before the vote
passes ?

thanks,
nandana

[1] - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.security.devel/6326

Re: FYI: Vote for xml-sec 1.4.2 is on

[Fred Dushin <fa...@apache.org>]

Nice -- maybe we could plan this for 1.5.5

-Fred

On Jun 13, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:

> Vote [1] for xml-sec 1.4.2 is on and I am planning to test it with  
> Rampart trunk over the weekend. We may be able to get xml-sec 1.4.2  
> signed artifacts to central repository this time, so we may even be  
> able to move to xml-sec 1.4.2 in next WSS4J version if everything  
> works fine with xml-sec 1.4.2 . Can someone from CXF also do the  
> testing with xml-sec 1.4.2 before the vote passes ?
>
> thanks,
> nandana
>
> [1] - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.security.devel/6326

Re: FYI: Vote for xml-sec 1.4.2 is on

[Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <na...@gmail.com>]

And you can find the RC1 here.

http://people.apache.org/~mullan/dist/xmlsec-1.4.2rc1.jar

thanks,
nandana

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <
nandana.cse@gmail.com> wrote:

> Vote [1] for xml-sec 1.4.2 is on and I am planning to test it with Rampart
> trunk over the weekend. We may be able to get xml-sec 1.4.2 signed artifacts
> to central repository this time, so we may even be able to move to xml-sec
> 1.4.2 in next WSS4J version if everything works fine with xml-sec 1.4.2 .
> Can someone from CXF also do the testing with xml-sec 1.4.2 before the vote
> passes ?
>
> thanks,
> nandana
>
> [1] - http://article.gmane.org/gmane.text.xml.security.devel/6326
>