You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by "Joe Fernandez (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/12/18 00:56:26 UTC
[jira] Created: (AMQ-1523) Consumer Priorities Appear To Be Broken
On AMQ 5.0
Consumer Priorities Appear To Be Broken On AMQ 5.0
--------------------------------------------------
Key: AMQ-1523
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1523
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 5.0.0
Environment: AMQ 5.0 on Windows XP Pro
Reporter: Joe Fernandez
1. I have two brokers A and B, which are interconnected via a forwarding bridge.
2. conduitSubscriptions is set to "true" (default)
3. Connected to each of the brokers, I have a consumer reading off a queue called Q.TEST.
4. The consumer on broker B is given a vastly different priority than the consumer on broker A.
5. I start a producer that connects to broker A and sends x number of messages to Q.TEST.
On AMQ 4.1.1, the consumer with the higher priority would receive more of the message load. However, on the just-released AMQ 5.0 this is not the case; the message load is being evenly distributed across both consumers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (AMQ-1523) Consumer Priorities Appear To Be Broken
On AMQ 5.0
Posted by "Rob Davies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1523.
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.1.0
Resolution: Fixed
> Consumer Priorities Appear To Be Broken On AMQ 5.0
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1523
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1523
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0
> Environment: AMQ 5.0 on Windows XP Pro
> Reporter: Joe Fernandez
> Assignee: Rob Davies
> Fix For: 5.1.0
>
>
> 1. I have two brokers A and B, which are interconnected via a forwarding bridge.
> 2. conduitSubscriptions is set to "true" (default)
> 3. Connected to each of the brokers, I have a consumer reading off a queue called Q.TEST.
> 4. The consumer on broker B is given a vastly different priority than the consumer on broker A.
> 5. I start a producer that connects to broker A and sends x number of messages to Q.TEST.
> On AMQ 4.1.1, the consumer with the higher priority would receive more of the message load. However, on the just-released AMQ 5.0 this is not the case; the message load is being evenly distributed across both consumers.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (AMQ-1523) Consumer Priorities Appear To Be Broken
On AMQ 5.0
Posted by "Rob Davies (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-1523:
-------------------------------
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Consumer Priorities Appear To Be Broken On AMQ 5.0
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMQ-1523
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1523
> Project: ActiveMQ
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Broker
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0
> Environment: AMQ 5.0 on Windows XP Pro
> Reporter: Joe Fernandez
> Assignee: Rob Davies
>
> 1. I have two brokers A and B, which are interconnected via a forwarding bridge.
> 2. conduitSubscriptions is set to "true" (default)
> 3. Connected to each of the brokers, I have a consumer reading off a queue called Q.TEST.
> 4. The consumer on broker B is given a vastly different priority than the consumer on broker A.
> 5. I start a producer that connects to broker A and sends x number of messages to Q.TEST.
> On AMQ 4.1.1, the consumer with the higher priority would receive more of the message load. However, on the just-released AMQ 5.0 this is not the case; the message load is being evenly distributed across both consumers.
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.