You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> on 2008/03/27 15:24:36 UTC
RC1 on Friday (was: Re: SVN 1.5 and RC1)
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
>
> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
-Hyrum
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com>.
Achim Spangler <Ac...@mnet-online.de> writes:
>> By the way, could you update issue #3148 to point to the mailing list
>> archive url for the original thread? Right now the issue quotes Mike
>> Pilato, but does not actually point to the message/thread.#
> I added the URL to the corresponding thread in the dev-email list archive
> right now:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=136485
Thank you.
> Hopefully the later abort of svn co/up can be integrated without too much
> afford for experts.
Especially as we accumulate more experts all the time :-).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by Achim Spangler <Ac...@mnet-online.de>.
Hello Karl,
Am Donnerstag, 3. April 2008 schrieb Karl Fogel:
> Achim Spangler <Ac...@mnet-online.de> writes:
> > is there a chance to get issue 3148
> > ( http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3148 ) solved for
> > final 1.5?
> >
> > I understood the comment of C. Michael Pilato, as if this would be a
> > reasonable change/fix/enhancement, and that this shouldn't be too
> > complex.
> >
> > This would make lists of "svn:externals" better useable, when a subset of
> > the "svn:externals" is not available/accessible (i.e. retrieve all other
> > accessible svn:externals resources and simply report the failed ones at
> > the end).
>
> I think we have to draw the line somewhere -- we do want 1.5 to ship,
> after all :-). This enhancement can come out in a later release. I
> agree it is a totally reasonable enhancement.
>
> By the way, could you update issue #3148 to point to the mailing list
> archive url for the original thread? Right now the issue quotes Mike
> Pilato, but does not actually point to the message/thread.#
I added the URL to the corresponding thread in the dev-email list archive
right now:
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=136485
Hopefully the later abort of svn co/up can be integrated without too much
afford for experts.
Thanks,
Achim
http://www.isoaglib.org
http://projects.osb-ag.de/svn/OSB/IsoAgLib/IsoAgLib
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com>.
Achim Spangler <Ac...@mnet-online.de> writes:
> is there a chance to get issue 3148
> ( http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3148 ) solved for final
> 1.5?
>
> I understood the comment of C. Michael Pilato, as if this would be a
> reasonable change/fix/enhancement, and that this shouldn't be too complex.
>
> This would make lists of "svn:externals" better useable, when a subset of
> the "svn:externals" is not available/accessible (i.e. retrieve all other
> accessible svn:externals resources and simply report the failed ones at the
> end).
I think we have to draw the line somewhere -- we do want 1.5 to ship,
after all :-). This enhancement can come out in a later release. I
agree it is a totally reasonable enhancement.
By the way, could you update issue #3148 to point to the mailing list
archive url for the original thread? Right now the issue quotes Mike
Pilato, but does not actually point to the message/thread.
Thanks,
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday (was: Re: SVN 1.5 and RC1)
Posted by Achim Spangler <Ac...@mnet-online.de>.
Hi,
is there a chance to get issue 3148
( http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3148 ) solved for final
1.5?
I understood the comment of C. Michael Pilato, as if this would be a
reasonable change/fix/enhancement, and that this shouldn't be too complex.
This would make lists of "svn:externals" better useable, when a subset of
the "svn:externals" is not available/accessible (i.e. retrieve all other
accessible svn:externals resources and simply report the failed ones at the
end).
Thanks,
Achim
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2008 schrieb Mark Phippard:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
>
> <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > > Karl Fogel wrote:
> > > > RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
> > >
> > > That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
> > > that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
> >
> > STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
> > to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
>
> There are a couple of items in STATUS now. Other than that, there is
> just the proposed change to the mergeinfo command line output. I
> think we have reached consensus on the UI change, and decided on the
> minor formatting changes, rather than the bigger "make it look like
> svn log" proposals. Once cmpilato wraps it up, commits it and
> proposes it for backport we should be able to roll RC1 when the STATUS
> file is clean. Probably by Friday I would guess.
>
> So it might be worth putting out another call to make sure everything
> has been proposed and voted on prior to then.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> Karl Fogel wrote:
>>>
>>>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
>>>>
>>> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
>>> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
>>>
>> STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning to
>> roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
>
> There are a couple of items in STATUS now. Other than that, there is
> just the proposed change to the mergeinfo command line output. I
> think we have reached consensus on the UI change, and decided on the
> minor formatting changes, rather than the bigger "make it look like
> svn log" proposals. Once cmpilato wraps it up, commits it and
> proposes it for backport we should be able to roll RC1 when the STATUS
> file is clean. Probably by Friday I would guess.
>
> So it might be worth putting out another call to make sure everything
> has been proposed and voted on prior to then.
Okee-dokee. I'll send something out tomorrow.
-Hyrum
Re: RC1 on Friday (was: Re: SVN 1.5 and RC1)
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
> > Karl Fogel wrote:
> >
> > > RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
> > >
> >
> > That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
> > that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
> >
>
> STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning to
> roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
There are a couple of items in STATUS now. Other than that, there is
just the proposed change to the mergeinfo command line output. I
think we have reached consensus on the UI change, and decided on the
minor formatting changes, rather than the bigger "make it look like
svn log" proposals. Once cmpilato wraps it up, commits it and
proposes it for backport we should be able to roll RC1 when the STATUS
file is clean. Probably by Friday I would guess.
So it might be worth putting out another call to make sure everything
has been proposed and voted on prior to then.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by Karl Fogel <kf...@red-bean.com>.
"Mark Phippard" <ma...@gmail.com> writes:
>> Has the 'svn mergeinfo' UI conversation come to closure yet? The API
>> changes there are still in progress on a branch.
>
> I did not sense any real disagreement from people. It seemed like
> everyone was basically proposing the same thing. It might be easier
> to reach consensus if we can see what you have implemented, or if you
> can just implement something specific that we can comment on.
I think we're close to agreement, but there is still the question of
whether to show revision ranges or individual revisions. This is
orthogonal to the "show logs" question -- or rather, it only applies
when we already know we're not showing logs.
I've reposted in the main thread about this, to try to get this
resolved. As far as I know, yes, this is the only question left.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:29 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> >> Karl Fogel wrote:
> >>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
> >>
> >> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
> >> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
> >
> > STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
> > to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
>
> Has the 'svn mergeinfo' UI conversation come to closure yet? The API
> changes there are still in progress on a branch.
I did not sense any real disagreement from people. It seemed like
everyone was basically proposing the same thing. It might be easier
to reach consensus if we can see what you have implemented, or if you
can just implement something specific that we can comment on.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 3/27/08, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> Karl Fogel wrote:
>>>>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
>>>> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
>>>> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
>>> STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
>>> to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
>> Has the 'svn mergeinfo' UI conversation come to closure yet? The API
>> changes there are still in progress on a branch.
>>
>> Also, there's a Neon compat-code bugfix I'm still looking at.
>
> That sounds like an objection :-)
That sounds reasonable. I'll wait until those issues are resolved, and
then ping the list again.
> Any ideas on the ETA of any of those? (compat-code bugfix, API
> changes? I presume you can't comment on the UI conversation.)
-Hyrum
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Erik Huelsmann wrote:
> On 3/27/08, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> Karl Fogel wrote:
>>>>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
>>>> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
>>>> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
>>> STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
>>> to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
>> Has the 'svn mergeinfo' UI conversation come to closure yet? The API
>> changes there are still in progress on a branch.
>>
>> Also, there's a Neon compat-code bugfix I'm still looking at.
>
> That sounds like an objection :-)
>
> Any ideas on the ETA of any of those? (compat-code bugfix, API
> changes? I presume you can't comment on the UI conversation.)
I'm testing the mod_dav_svn bugfix (turns out this is a server-side problem,
not client-side) now. I'll move from there directly to the mergeinfo API stuff.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by Erik Huelsmann <eh...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/08, C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> > Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> >> Karl Fogel wrote:
> >>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
> >>
> >> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
> >> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
> >
> > STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
> > to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
>
> Has the 'svn mergeinfo' UI conversation come to closure yet? The API
> changes there are still in progress on a branch.
>
> Also, there's a Neon compat-code bugfix I'm still looking at.
That sounds like an objection :-)
Any ideas on the ETA of any of those? (compat-code bugfix, API
changes? I presume you can't comment on the UI conversation.)
Bye,
Erik.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RC1 on Friday
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Karl Fogel wrote:
>>> RC1 this week? :-) Hyrum?
>>
>> That works for me. I'm going to be afk for most of the weekend, but
>> that shouldn't block folks if we roll on Thursday or Friday.
>
> STATUS is looking pretty clean, and unless anybody objects, I'm planning
> to roll RC1 tomorrow morning (03-28-2008 @ 1500 UTC).
Has the 'svn mergeinfo' UI conversation come to closure yet? The API
changes there are still in progress on a branch.
Also, there's a Neon compat-code bugfix I'm still looking at.
--
C. Michael Pilato <cm...@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand