Work this week

[Dan Filimon <da...@gmail.com>]

Hi Ted,

I have a lot of work to do for school (multiple assignments with
pressing deadlines :) and I won't be able to do any meaningful work
this week.

So, I'll mostly just be reading the papers (streaming k-means) again
to correct any more misconceptions. I didn't really read the paper all
that carefully so now would be a good time for that.

This is why I'm thinking we could skip this week's one on one. We
could do it, but without me doing enough work I'd probably waste your
time.

What do you think? Is this okay?

Re: Work this week

[Dan Filimon <da...@gmail.com>]

You're right!
We'll have the 1-on-1 as planned.

Now, I need to get back to generating LLVM code... :)

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Dan Filimon <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ted,
>>
>> I have a lot of work to do for school (multiple assignments with
>> pressing deadlines :) and I won't be able to do any meaningful work
>> this week.
>
>
> School comes first.
>
>>
>> So, I'll mostly just be reading the papers (streaming k-means) again
>> to correct any more misconceptions. I didn't really read the paper all
>> that carefully so now would be a good time for that.
>
>
> As you like.  Or not.  Focus where focus is needed.  Defocus if you need
> relaxation.
>
>>
>> This is why I'm thinking we could skip this week's one on one. We
>> could do it, but without me doing enough work I'd probably waste your
>> time.
>
>
> How about we have the one-on-one anyway but expect that it will take 5
> minutes?
>
> I would rather you planned on those five minutes than re-reading an article
> that is a distraction away from school.

Re: Work this week

[Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Dan Filimon <da...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Ted,
>
> I have a lot of work to do for school (multiple assignments with
> pressing deadlines :) and I won't be able to do any meaningful work
> this week.
>

School comes first.


> So, I'll mostly just be reading the papers (streaming k-means) again
> to correct any more misconceptions. I didn't really read the paper all
> that carefully so now would be a good time for that.
>

As you like.  Or not.  Focus where focus is needed.  Defocus if you need
relaxation.


> This is why I'm thinking we could skip this week's one on one. We
> could do it, but without me doing enough work I'd probably waste your
> time.
>

How about we have the one-on-one anyway but expect that it will take 5
minutes?

I would rather you planned on those five minutes than re-reading an article
that is a distraction away from school.