You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by Raymond Lukas <rl...@cadence.com> on 2002/12/20 17:03:25 UTC
BUG in setStart and setEndIndex method of AbstractQueryImpl ?
I think that we have a problem with the setStart and setEndIndex methods
of the org.apache.ojb.broker.query.AbstractQueryImpl object. Here is
why I say this. When I invoke this execute method with (startPos = 1,
endPos=3) and then again with (startPos = 4, endPos=8). I do not get the
desired (expected) results. The following code returns
// criteria is basically empty and sorts by object id's
public Response execute() {
ResponseImpl response = new ResponseImpl();
Query query = new QueryByCriteria(User.class, super.criteria);
query.setStartAtIndex(super.startPos);
query.setEndAtIndex(super.endPos);
try {
broker.beginTransaction();
response.setTotalCount(super.getMaxResultSetSize(query));
response.setResults((Collection)broker.getCollectionByQuery(
query));
broker.commitTransaction();
}
catch (Exception exc) {
broker.abortTransaction();
exc.printStackTrace();
}
Records 100, 101 for the first request and records 100, 101, 103 and 104
for the second request. I am trying to use this mechanism for paging a
result set.
I have 8 records (100-108). There must be something that I must forget
(null for garbage collection) between requests. But without and
example.. I tired creating a new default broker between each request and
that did not help.