You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org> on 2003/02/27 00:01:07 UTC

CVS branches...

In the current xml-cocoon2 cvs module there are two branches:
cocoon_20_branch and cocoon_2_0_3_branch

Which one is the current branch used for 2.0 (I suspect 2_0_3)...

    Pier

Re: CVS branches...

Posted by Torsten Curdt <tc...@dff.st>.

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> 
>> In the current xml-cocoon2 cvs module there are two branches:
>> cocoon_20_branch and cocoon_2_0_3_branch
>>
>> Which one is the current branch used for 2.0 (I suspect 2_0_3)...
>>  
>>
> 
> You suspect correctly.
> 
> cocoon_2_0_3_branch is the "real" 2.0 branch.

If we (Well, Pier ;) does the restructuring shouldn't the stable branch 
also be renamed?? ..to avoid exactly this confusion?!

I mean "cocoon_2_0_3_branch" is not quite the right name, hm?
--
Torsten

Re: CVS branches...

Posted by Vadim Gritsenko <va...@verizon.net>.

Pier Fumagalli wrote:

>In the current xml-cocoon2 cvs module there are two branches:
>cocoon_20_branch and cocoon_2_0_3_branch
>
>Which one is the current branch used for 2.0 (I suspect 2_0_3)...
>  
>

You suspect correctly.

cocoon_2_0_3_branch is the "real" 2.0 branch.



Vadim


>    Pier
>