You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hivemind.apache.org by Achim Hügen <ac...@gmx.de> on 2007/01/11 23:27:07 UTC
[RESULT] HiveMind 2.0 road map
I was hoping to get some more feedback from the other committers,
nevertheless it's a clear result:
Howard Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
Achim Huegen: +1 (binding)
Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non binding)
Davor Hrg +1(non binding)
Johan Lindquist: +1 (non-binding)
Adam Saltiel +1 (non-binding)
Bye
Achim
Am Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:25:21 +0100 schrieb Achim Hügen
<ac...@gmx.de>:
>
> I'd like to officially propose the code base from my
> 2.0 branch as foundation for HiveMind 2.0.
>
> The branch contains a stable implementation
> of hivemind that was completely refactored to be able to support
> annotation based modules.
> Look here for a description of new features:
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/NewAndNoteworthyFeaturesInAnnotationBranch
>
> The version is backward compatible to a large degree:
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/HiveMind2_Backward_Compatibility
>
> During the last month I focused on enhancements that were proposed
> by the other committers. E.g.
> - Removed "natures"
> - Introduced interfaces for registry definition api
> - Moved symbol support to xml module
>
> So I think we now have a version that reflects common visions.
>
> Please vote +1 if you agree to make the branch the official
> 2.0 branch.
> In that case I will release a first public beta soon to get
> some feedback from community.
> The registry definition api and the annotated modules api will both
> be marked as not-stable in that release.
>
>
> Achim Huegen: +1
>
> Happy new year
> Achim
Re: [RESULT] HiveMind 2.0 road map
Posted by Knut Wannheden <kn...@gmail.com>.
Hi Achim,
Sorry about the delay. I just got back from a 3 week holiday the day
before yesterday and I am still catching up. I have also not taken any
time to inspect the many changes you've made in detail. I've really
only read your commit logs. I was really quite pleasantly surprised at
the many changes you've made which we discussed but you didn't really
seem to agree with.
I'd also get this thing rolling as soon as possible. So for what it's
still worth here is my thumbs up:
Knut Wannheden: +1 (binding)
I still have a few other minor points about the registry definition
API I'd like to discuss but I'll start another thread for that.
Thanks for the great work so far!
--knut
On 1/11/07, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry. +1 (binding)
>
>
> On 1/11/07, Achim Hügen <ac...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > I was hoping to get some more feedback from the other committers,
> > nevertheless it's a clear result:
> >
> > Howard Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
> > Achim Huegen: +1 (binding)
> >
> > Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non binding)
> > Davor Hrg +1(non binding)
> > Johan Lindquist: +1 (non-binding)
> > Adam Saltiel +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Bye
> > Achim
> >
> >
> > Am Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:25:21 +0100 schrieb Achim Hügen
> > <ac...@gmx.de>:
> >
> > >
> > > I'd like to officially propose the code base from my
> > > 2.0 branch as foundation for HiveMind 2.0.
> > >
> > > The branch contains a stable implementation
> > > of hivemind that was completely refactored to be able to support
> > > annotation based modules.
> > > Look here for a description of new features:
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/NewAndNoteworthyFeaturesInAnnotationBranch
> > >
> > > The version is backward compatible to a large degree:
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/HiveMind2_Backward_Compatibility
> > >
> > > During the last month I focused on enhancements that were proposed
> > > by the other committers. E.g.
> > > - Removed "natures"
> > > - Introduced interfaces for registry definition api
> > > - Moved symbol support to xml module
> > >
> > > So I think we now have a version that reflects common visions.
> > >
> > > Please vote +1 if you agree to make the branch the official
> > > 2.0 branch.
> > > In that case I will release a first public beta soon to get
> > > some feedback from community.
> > > The registry definition api and the annotated modules api will both
> > > be marked as not-stable in that release.
> > >
> > >
> > > Achim Huegen: +1
> > >
> > > Happy new year
> > > Achim
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [RESULT] HiveMind 2.0 road map
Posted by Paul Cooley <pe...@gmail.com>.
Community? Us? :"> +1(binding)
On 1/11/07, James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> I'm sorry. +1 (binding)
>
>
> On 1/11/07, Achim Hügen <ac...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > I was hoping to get some more feedback from the other committers,
> > nevertheless it's a clear result:
> >
> > Howard Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
> > Achim Huegen: +1 (binding)
> >
> > Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non binding)
> > Davor Hrg +1(non binding)
> > Johan Lindquist: +1 (non-binding)
> > Adam Saltiel +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Bye
> > Achim
> >
> >
> > Am Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:25:21 +0100 schrieb Achim Hügen
> > <ac...@gmx.de>:
> >
> > >
> > > I'd like to officially propose the code base from my
> > > 2.0 branch as foundation for HiveMind 2.0.
> > >
> > > The branch contains a stable implementation
> > > of hivemind that was completely refactored to be able to support
> > > annotation based modules.
> > > Look here for a description of new features:
> > >
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/NewAndNoteworthyFeaturesInAnnotationBranch
> > >
> > > The version is backward compatible to a large degree:
> > >
> http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/HiveMind2_Backward_Compatibility
> > >
> > > During the last month I focused on enhancements that were proposed
> > > by the other committers. E.g.
> > > - Removed "natures"
> > > - Introduced interfaces for registry definition api
> > > - Moved symbol support to xml module
> > >
> > > So I think we now have a version that reflects common visions.
> > >
> > > Please vote +1 if you agree to make the branch the official
> > > 2.0 branch.
> > > In that case I will release a first public beta soon to get
> > > some feedback from community.
> > > The registry definition api and the annotated modules api will both
> > > be marked as not-stable in that release.
> > >
> > >
> > > Achim Huegen: +1
> > >
> > > Happy new year
> > > Achim
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Gotta find my destiny, before it gets too late.-- Ian Curtis
Re: [RESULT] HiveMind 2.0 road map
Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.
I'm sorry. +1 (binding)
On 1/11/07, Achim Hügen <ac...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I was hoping to get some more feedback from the other committers,
> nevertheless it's a clear result:
>
> Howard Lewis Ship: +1 (binding)
> Achim Huegen: +1 (binding)
>
> Massimo Lusetti: +1 (non binding)
> Davor Hrg +1(non binding)
> Johan Lindquist: +1 (non-binding)
> Adam Saltiel +1 (non-binding)
>
> Bye
> Achim
>
>
> Am Mon, 01 Jan 2007 17:25:21 +0100 schrieb Achim Hügen
> <ac...@gmx.de>:
>
> >
> > I'd like to officially propose the code base from my
> > 2.0 branch as foundation for HiveMind 2.0.
> >
> > The branch contains a stable implementation
> > of hivemind that was completely refactored to be able to support
> > annotation based modules.
> > Look here for a description of new features:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/NewAndNoteworthyFeaturesInAnnotationBranch
> >
> > The version is backward compatible to a large degree:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-hivemind/HiveMind2_Backward_Compatibility
> >
> > During the last month I focused on enhancements that were proposed
> > by the other committers. E.g.
> > - Removed "natures"
> > - Introduced interfaces for registry definition api
> > - Moved symbol support to xml module
> >
> > So I think we now have a version that reflects common visions.
> >
> > Please vote +1 if you agree to make the branch the official
> > 2.0 branch.
> > In that case I will release a first public beta soon to get
> > some feedback from community.
> > The registry definition api and the annotated modules api will both
> > be marked as not-stable in that release.
> >
> >
> > Achim Huegen: +1
> >
> > Happy new year
> > Achim
>
>
>