You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by tr...@apache.org on 2007/11/07 15:34:10 UTC

svn commit: r592761 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Author: trawick
Date: Wed Nov  7 06:34:09 2007
New Revision: 592761

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=592761&view=rev
Log:
one commit to address multiple distinct issues can result in perpetual
confusion

Modified:
    httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS?rev=592761&r1=592760&r2=592761&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Nov  7 06:34:09 2007
@@ -249,17 +249,6 @@
           space for the NUL, but they don't have related sections
           which assume a set size; this does (AP_IOBUFSIZE).
 
-   * EBCDIC fix to mod_authnz_ldap AUTHENTICATE_foo variables
-     trunk:
-       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=571798
-     2.2.x patch:
-         Unrelated changes which either don't apply or rely on 
-         a definition in mod_auth.h have been omitted.
-       http://people.apache.org/~trawick/ldap_toupper.txt
-     +1: trawick
-     -1: niq - this is part of another backport proposal above.
-         Doesn't apply to mod_authn_dbd without the other backport.
-
    * mod_charset_lite: Don't crash when the request has no associated
      filename.
      trunk:
@@ -330,3 +319,21 @@
           behavior on a pattern-by-pattern basis would win my -1 to a +1,
           and solve the performance hits noted by niq on an 80/20 basis.
 
+   * EBCDIC fix to mod_authnz_ldap AUTHENTICATE_foo variables
+     trunk:
+       http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=571798
+     2.2.x patch:
+         Unrelated changes which either don't apply or rely on 
+         a definition in mod_auth.h have been omitted.
+       http://people.apache.org/~trawick/ldap_toupper.txt
+     +1: trawick
+     -1: niq - this is part of another backport proposal above.
+         Doesn't apply to mod_authn_dbd without the other backport.
+     trawick: niq is of course correct; this simple EBCDIC fix is
+       tied up in a conflict-ridden proposal above for mod_authn_dbd
+       which also references r571790.  If nobody is able to unravel that
+       backport and provide a good patch for review, I'll activate this
+       proposal and deactivate the other, and when somebody has the time to
+       offer a consolidated patch they can easily omit the several lines
+       that correct the EBDIC problem so that the two separate issues
+       can finally be addressed separately.



Re: svn commit: r592761 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 7, 2007 4:21 PM, Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:34:10 -0000
> trawick@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: trawick
> > Date: Wed Nov  7 06:34:09 2007
> > New Revision: 592761
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=592761&view=rev
> > Log:
> > one commit to address multiple distinct issues can result in perpetual
> > confusion
>
> :-)
>
> I missed your 2.2.x patch earlier.  If it's important, I have no
> problem changing my comment to +1 for that alone.  But preferably
> drop the reference to r571798.

I'll try to find the time to create a master patch for the dbd+EBCDIC
backport proposal to help get that unstuck...  Then everybody gets
their desired fix into 2.2.x.

Re: svn commit: r592761 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS

Posted by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com>.
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:34:10 -0000
trawick@apache.org wrote:

> Author: trawick
> Date: Wed Nov  7 06:34:09 2007
> New Revision: 592761
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=592761&view=rev
> Log:
> one commit to address multiple distinct issues can result in perpetual
> confusion

:-)

I missed your 2.2.x patch earlier.  If it's important, I have no
problem changing my comment to +1 for that alone.  But preferably
drop the reference to r571798.

-- 
Nick Kew

Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/