You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ambari.apache.org by Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com> on 2018/01/26 05:19:00 UTC

[DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Hi devs,

We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.

The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.

Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here is my +1 to start.

Best Regards,

Sid

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Aravindan Vijayan <av...@hortonworks.com>.

--
Thanks and Regards,
Aravindan Vijayan

On 1/25/18, 9:19 PM, "Siddharth Wagle" <sw...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

Hi devs,

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here is my +1 to start.

Best Regards,

Sid

Re: Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Aravindan Vijayan <av...@hortonworks.com>.

Hello all,
 
Due to a notification settings issue in the newly created Ambari Infra services Git repos (Infra, Logsearch & Metrics), the dev@ambari group is getting a mail on every Pull Request update on these repos. We are working with Apache Infra (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17063) to resolve this. Please ignore the mails until then.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Aravindan Vijayan

On 9/25/18, 11:32 AM, "Siddharth Wagle" <sw...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

    Resending with corected title since this is not a VOTE thread.
    
    BR,
    Sid
    ________________________________________
    From: Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:23 AM
    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
    
    Hi, devs,
    
    We now have separate repos for LogSearch, Ambari Infra and Ambari Metrics projects. Here are the git URLs for each:
    
    https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-infra.git
    https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-metrics.git
    https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-logsearch.git
    
    Oliver Szabo and Aravindan Vijayan are working on getting the initial history preserving commits into these created repositories for the individual sub-projects.
    
    Best Regards,
    Sid
    
    ________________________________________
    From: Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>
    Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 4:42 PM
    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
    Subject: [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
    
    Hi all,
    
    Thanks for voting on this thread, making it an official vote thread.
    
    Thus far we have 8 +1's on the discussion thread.
    
    2 PMCs
    5 Committers
    1 Contributors
    
    BR,
    Sid
    
    ________________________________________
    From: Myroslav Papyrkovskyy <mp...@hortonworks.com>
    Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:32 AM
    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
    
    +1
    
    Regards,
    Myroslav Papirkovskyi
    
    > 29 січ. 2018 р. о 10:36 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com> написав(ла):
    >
    > +1
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
    >
    > 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>님이 작성:
    >
    >> +1
    >>
    >> -Vivek Ratnavel
    >>
    >> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
    >> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
    >>> wrote:
    >>
    >>> +1
    >>> --
    >>> Nishant Bangarwa
    >>> Hortonworks
    >>> (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com>
    >> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> +1 for the splitting.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thanks.
    >>>>
    >>>> Regards,
    >>>> Swapan.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> +1
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
    >>> wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   +1
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   -----Original Message-----
    >>>>>   From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
    >>>>>   Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
    >>>>>   To: dev@ambari.apache.org
    >>>>>   Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
    >>> ambari-logsearch
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   Hi devs,
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
    >>> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
    >>> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
    >> of
    >>> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
    >>> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
    >> not
    >>> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
    >> these
    >>> two modules to be published independently.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
    >> Metrics,
    >>> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
    >>> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
    >> wanted
    >>> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
    >>> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
    >> LogSearch
    >>> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
    >>> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
    >>> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
    >>> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
    >>> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
    >>> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
    >>> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
    >>> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   [ ] +1 approve
    >>>>>   [ ] +0 no opinion
    >>>>>   [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   Here is my +1 to start.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   Best Regards,
    >>>>>
    >>>>>   Sid
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>
    >>

Re: Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>.

Resending with corected title since this is not a VOTE thread.

BR,
Sid
________________________________________
From: Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:23 AM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Hi, devs,

We now have separate repos for LogSearch, Ambari Infra and Ambari Metrics projects. Here are the git URLs for each:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-infra.git
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-metrics.git
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-logsearch.git

Oliver Szabo and Aravindan Vijayan are working on getting the initial history preserving commits into these created repositories for the individual sub-projects.

Best Regards,
Sid

________________________________________
From: Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 4:42 PM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Hi all,

Thanks for voting on this thread, making it an official vote thread.

Thus far we have 8 +1's on the discussion thread.

2 PMCs
5 Committers
1 Contributors

BR,
Sid

________________________________________
From: Myroslav Papyrkovskyy <mp...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:32 AM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

+1

Regards,
Myroslav Papirkovskyi

> 29 січ. 2018 р. о 10:36 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com> написав(ла):
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>님이 작성:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Vivek Ratnavel
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
>> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Nishant Bangarwa
>>> Hortonworks
>>> (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for the splitting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Swapan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   +1
>>>>>
>>>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>>>   From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
>>>>>   Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>>>>>   To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>>>>>   Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
>>> ambari-logsearch
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
>>> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
>>> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
>> of
>>> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
>>> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
>> not
>>> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
>> these
>>> two modules to be published independently.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
>> Metrics,
>>> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
>>> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
>> wanted
>>> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
>>> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
>> LogSearch
>>> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
>>> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
>>> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
>>> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
>>> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
>>> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
>>> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
>>> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>   [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>   [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Here is my +1 to start.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>   Sid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>.

Hi, devs,

We now have separate repos for LogSearch, Ambari Infra and Ambari Metrics projects. Here are the git URLs for each:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-infra.git
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-metrics.git
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ambari-logsearch.git

Oliver Szabo and Aravindan Vijayan are working on getting the initial history preserving commits into these created repositories for the individual sub-projects.

Best Regards,
Sid

________________________________________
From: Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 4:42 PM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Hi all,

Thanks for voting on this thread, making it an official vote thread.

Thus far we have 8 +1's on the discussion thread.

2 PMCs
5 Committers
1 Contributors

BR,
Sid

________________________________________
From: Myroslav Papyrkovskyy <mp...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:32 AM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

+1

Regards,
Myroslav Papirkovskyi

> 29 січ. 2018 р. о 10:36 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com> написав(ла):
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>님이 작성:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Vivek Ratnavel
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
>> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Nishant Bangarwa
>>> Hortonworks
>>> (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for the splitting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Swapan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   +1
>>>>>
>>>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>>>   From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
>>>>>   Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>>>>>   To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>>>>>   Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
>>> ambari-logsearch
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
>>> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
>>> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
>> of
>>> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
>>> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
>> not
>>> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
>> these
>>> two modules to be published independently.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
>> Metrics,
>>> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
>>> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
>> wanted
>>> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
>>> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
>> LogSearch
>>> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
>>> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
>>> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
>>> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
>>> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
>>> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
>>> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
>>> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>   [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>   [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Here is my +1 to start.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>   Sid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>

[VOTE] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Siddharth Wagle <sw...@hortonworks.com>.

Hi all,

Thanks for voting on this thread, making it an official vote thread.

Thus far we have 8 +1's on the discussion thread.

2 PMCs
5 Committers
1 Contributors

BR,
Sid

________________________________________
From: Myroslav Papyrkovskyy <mp...@hortonworks.com>
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 3:32 AM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

+1

Regards,
Myroslav Papirkovskyi

> 29 січ. 2018 р. о 10:36 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com> написав(ла):
>
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
> 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>님이 작성:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Vivek Ratnavel
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
>> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Nishant Bangarwa
>>> Hortonworks
>>> (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 for the splitting.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Swapan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   +1
>>>>>
>>>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>>>   From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
>>>>>   Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>>>>>   To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>>>>>   Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
>>> ambari-logsearch
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi devs,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
>>> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
>>> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
>> of
>>> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
>>> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
>> not
>>> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
>> these
>>> two modules to be published independently.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
>> Metrics,
>>> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
>>> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
>> wanted
>>> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
>>> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
>> LogSearch
>>> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
>>> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
>>> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
>>> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
>>> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
>>> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
>>> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
>>> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>   [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>   [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Here is my +1 to start.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   Best Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>   Sid
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Myroslav Papyrkovskyy <mp...@hortonworks.com>.

+1

Regards,
Myroslav Papirkovskyi

> 29 січ. 2018 р. о 10:36 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com> написав(ла):
> 
> +1
> 
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>님이 작성:
> 
>> +1
>> 
>> -Vivek Ratnavel
>> 
>> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
>> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
>>> wrote:
>> 
>>> +1
>>> --
>>> Nishant Bangarwa
>>> Hortonworks
>>> (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1 for the splitting.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Swapan.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   +1
>>>>> 
>>>>>   -----Original Message-----
>>>>>   From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
>>>>>   Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>>>>>   To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>>>>>   Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
>>> ambari-logsearch
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Hi devs,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
>>> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
>>> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
>> of
>>> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
>>> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
>> not
>>> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
>> these
>>> two modules to be published independently.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
>> Metrics,
>>> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
>>> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
>> wanted
>>> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
>>> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
>> LogSearch
>>> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
>>> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
>>> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
>>> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
>>> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
>>> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
>>> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
>>> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   [ ] +1 approve
>>>>>   [ ] +0 no opinion
>>>>>   [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Here is my +1 to start.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Best Regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>>   Sid
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>.

+1

Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

2018년 1월 29일 (월) 오후 5:31, Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>님이 작성:

> +1
>
> -Vivek Ratnavel
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <
> nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1
> > --
> > Nishant Bangarwa
> > Hortonworks
> > (M): +91-9729200044 <+91%2097292%2000044>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > >+1 for the splitting.
> > >
> > >Thanks.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Swapan.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >>+1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>    +1
> > >>
> > >>    -----Original Message-----
> > >>    From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
> > >>    Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
> > >>    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
> > >>    Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
> > ambari-logsearch
> > >>
> > >>    Hi devs,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
> > w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
> > amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point
> of
> > discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
> > Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does
> not
> > have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to
> these
> > two modules to be published independently.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari
> Metrics,
> > Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
> > version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I
> wanted
> > to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
> > Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari
> LogSearch
> > and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
> > dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
> > feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
> > With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
> > services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
> > anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
> > ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
> > and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    [ ] +1 approve
> > >>    [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    Here is my +1 to start.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>    Best Regards,
> > >>
> > >>    Sid
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Vivek Ratnavel <vi...@apache.org>.

+1

-Vivek Ratnavel

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:51 PM, Nishant Bangarwa <nbangarwa@hortonworks.com
> wrote:

> +1
> --
> Nishant Bangarwa
> Hortonworks
> (M): +91-9729200044
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> >+1 for the splitting.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Swapan.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>+1
> >>
> >>
> >>On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>    +1
> >>
> >>    -----Original Message-----
> >>    From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com]
> >>    Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
> >>    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
> >>    Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and
> ambari-logsearch
> >>
> >>    Hi devs,
> >>
> >>
> >>    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari
> w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services,
> amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of
> discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of
> Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not
> have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these
> two modules to be published independently.
> >>
> >>
> >>    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics,
> Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and
> version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted
> to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an
> Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch
> and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
> >>
> >>
> >>    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time
> dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor
> feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources.
> With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack
> services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos
> anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the
> ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central
> and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
> >>
> >>
> >>    [ ] +1 approve
> >>    [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >>
> >>    Here is my +1 to start.
> >>
> >>
> >>    Best Regards,
> >>
> >>    Sid
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Nishant Bangarwa <nb...@hortonworks.com>.

+1 
--
Nishant Bangarwa
Hortonworks
(M): +91-9729200044







On 1/29/18, 10:20 AM, "Swapan Shridhar" <ss...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

>+1 for the splitting.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Regards,
>Swapan.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>+1
>>
>>
>>On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>    +1
>>    
>>    -----Original Message-----
>>    From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com] 
>>    Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>>    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>>    Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
>>    
>>    Hi devs,
>>    
>>    
>>    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.
>>    
>>    
>>    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>>    
>>    
>>    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>>    
>>    
>>    [ ] +1 approve
>>    [ ] +0 no opinion
>>    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>    
>>    
>>    Here is my +1 to start.
>>    
>>    
>>    Best Regards,
>>    
>>    Sid
>>    
>>    
>>
>>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Swapan Shridhar <ss...@hortonworks.com>.

+1 for the splitting.

Thanks.

Regards,
Swapan.









On 1/28/18, 11:58 AM, "Don Bosco Durai" <bo...@apache.org> wrote:

>+1
>
>
>On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>    +1
>    
>    -----Original Message-----
>    From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com] 
>    Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
>    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
>    Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
>    
>    Hi devs,
>    
>    
>    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.
>    
>    
>    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>    
>    
>    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>    
>    
>    [ ] +1 approve
>    [ ] +0 no opinion
>    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>    
>    
>    Here is my +1 to start.
>    
>    
>    Best Regards,
>    
>    Sid
>    
>    
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Don Bosco Durai <bo...@apache.org>.

+1


On 1/28/18, 11:56 AM, "Dmytro Grinenko" <dg...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

    +1
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com] 
    Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
    To: dev@ambari.apache.org
    Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch
    
    Hi devs,
    
    
    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.
    
    
    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
    
    
    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
    
    
    [ ] +1 approve
    [ ] +0 no opinion
    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
    
    
    Here is my +1 to start.
    
    
    Best Regards,
    
    Sid

RE: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Dmytro Grinenko <dg...@hortonworks.com>.

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Siddharth Wagle [mailto:swagle@hortonworks.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2018 7:19 AM
To: dev@ambari.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Hi devs,

We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.

The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.

Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here is my +1 to start.

Best Regards,

Sid

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Robert Levas <rl...@hortonworks.com>.

+1 to split.

Rob

On 1/26/18, 12:19 AM, "Siddharth Wagle" <sw...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

Hi devs,

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here is my +1 to start.

Best Regards,

Sid

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Jayush Luniya <jl...@hortonworks.com>.

+1 on this. This has been long standing on the wishlist :)

On Jan 26, 2018 7:44 AM, Jonathan Hurley <jh...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
+1 - I definitely think that splitting their off is a great idea.

> On Jan 26, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Nate Cole <nc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 1/26/18, 12:19 AM, "Siddharth Wagle" <sw...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>    Hi devs,
>
>
>    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.
>
>
>    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
>
>
>    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
>
>
>    [ ] +1 approve
>    [ ] +0 no opinion
>    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
>    Here is my +1 to start.
>
>
>    Best Regards,
>
>    Sid
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Jonathan Hurley <jh...@hortonworks.com>.

+1 - I definitely think that splitting their off is a great idea.

> On Jan 26, 2018, at 10:20 AM, Nate Cole <nc...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> 
> +1
> 
> On 1/26/18, 12:19 AM, "Siddharth Wagle" <sw...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> 
>    Hi devs,
> 
> 
>    We had a brief discussion about the release management of Ambari w.r.t to the new work that is on-going with Mpacks and multi-services, amongst the developers working on the respective pieces. The main point of discussion was that although Metrics and LogSearch are sub-projects of Ambari, the release cadence of these sub-projects and Ambari core does not have to be tied together. Having an Infra Mpack will allow changes to these two modules to be published independently.
> 
> 
>    The general consensus was to have separate repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari Log Search and Ambari Infra which would mean we can build and version these modules separately and simplify the release process. I wanted to start a discuss/vote thread for this. I will follow this up with an Infra ticket to fork off the git repos for Ambari Metrics, Ambari LogSearch and Ambari Infra separate from the core codebase once we reach consensus.
> 
> 
>    Note: These sub-projects do not have any compile-time or run-time dependencies on Ambari except logical dependency on Ambari stack advisor feature to configure the services correctly based on cluster resources. With the MPack effort this behavior will be delegated to individual stack services and the corresponding code will be housed in the service repos anyways. Ambari depends on Ambari Metrics at compile time on the ambari-metrics-common module which is already published to maven central and we would continue to do so if anything changes in the common library.
> 
> 
>    [ ] +1 approve
>    [ ] +0 no opinion
>    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> 
> 
>    Here is my +1 to start.
> 
> 
>    Best Regards,
> 
>    Sid
> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Splitting the repos - ambari-metrics and ambari-logsearch

Posted by Nate Cole <nc...@hortonworks.com>.

On 1/26/18, 12:19 AM, "Siddharth Wagle" <sw...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

Hi devs,

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Here is my +1 to start.

Best Regards,

Sid