Re: Plugin development & plexus-utils version

[Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>]

On Mittwoch, 30. April 2008, William Ferguson wrote:
> As Benjamin points out at the end of that Jira, the current behaviour is 
there to deal with use of libraries containing classes that extend classes in 
other libraries.
> 
> Seems to me that we need a way to differentiate in our projects which 
dependencies need to get *exported* as compile dependencies and which can get 
exported as runtime depedencies.
> 
> Projects that don't use implementation inheritance will be able to trim down 
their exported compile time dependencies to nil.
> 
> Implementation inheritance of any class relegates that class's library to 
being exported as a compile time dep, otherwise the library is exported as a 
runtime dep.

Maybe a new scope: private or hidden

- Jörg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org

Re: Plugin development & plexus-utils version

[Benjamin Bentmann <be...@udo.edu>]

Jörg Schaible wrote:

> Maybe a new scope

+1 on that instead of some time-consuming ASM post analysis and POM 
rewriting.


Benjamin 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org