You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@training.apache.org by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> on 2019/06/02 02:59:42 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Hi,
This is a call for a releasing Apache Training Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0 (incubating), release candidate 2.
The source artefact, including signatures and hashes can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/training/ApacheWay/NavigatingASFIncubation/1.0_rc2/
The tag to be voted upon is NavigatingASFIncubation1.0_rc2:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-training/tree/NavigatingASFIncubation1.0_rc2
The release hash is b719c7d5cb96aee0e213b68a5e758809fc02e619
The KEYS file is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/training/KEYS/
There’s a release checklist here [1], that might be helpful in checking the release.
The vote will be open for a minimum of 72 hours and until we have a result. Don’t forget you can change your vote after you have voted and 3 +1 votes are needed (and more +1s than -1s) before we’ll ask the IPMC to vote on this release.
[ ] +1 release this package
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 do not release this package because...
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Sönke Liebau <so...@opencore.com.INVALID>.
Please disregard question 2. from my previous email, I was just not reading
the docs carefully enough :(
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 21:46, Sönke Liebau <so...@opencore.com>
wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> sorry for the long time it took, but I finally had a look at the release
> candidate.
>
> Overall it looks good to me, I checked the signatures, built it and looked
> at regulatory files.
>
> I do have two questions on the NOTICE and LICENSE file though:
>
> 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
> originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there? I
> absolutely don't want to remove your name from the material as original
> author, but when looking at the Apache docs for assembling a NOTICE file it
> said to not put anything in there that is not legally required [1], which
> got me wondering.
>
> 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this project
> contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
> license. Should that not be in the Notice file? In the docs I found the
> following two sentences, which have me confused :)
> "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
> "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
> product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
> and sometimes more." [3]
>
> Probably both nits/non-issues, but wanted to briefly clarify.
>
> Best regards,
> Sönke
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> [2] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple
> [3] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#overview-of-files
>
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 19:07, Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitriy,
>>
>> thanks for checking!
>>
>> The "your name" stuff came at my request.
>> Justin had his personal details in there (e.g. Justin McLean, etc.) and in
>> my opinion the material should be anonymous. Similar to code where we
>> don't
>> have any @author tags.
>> So Justin removed the information. I'd be in favor of entirely removing
>> those slides but I'm fine with the current solution as well.
>>
>> As to the other one: Just reading that sentence makes sense to me. I just
>> looked at the slide and I think it's fine.
>> Looking at the title of the slide "Why we have an incubating process" this
>> one could begin with "To ensure" but I believe it's fine the way it is.
>>
>> The decision is yours but if that's everything you dislike I'd suggest we
>> can fix/change it post-release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:44 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi, Justin, Training developers,
>> >
>> > +0.9 (PPMC Binding),
>> > Checked license, notice readme and build from sources.
>> >
>> > I have only one remark. Generated slides in
>> >
>> >
>> /apache-training-navigating-ASF-incubation-1.0-incubating/target/generated-slides/index.html
>> > contain
>> > The first slide contains:
>> > ```Your Name
>> > Your Job title
>> > Your email```
>> >
>> > The second slide contains
>> > ```Who am I?
>> > TODO Fill in your own your info here```
>> >
>> > One from the next slide contains
>> > ```Ensure that decision making is done in the open``` <- Phrase seems
>> to be
>> > incomplete.
>> >
>> > Sincerely
>> > Dmitriy Pavlov
>> >
>> > пт, 7 июн. 2019 г. в 10:28, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
>> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks now we only need one more +1. Anyone?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Justin
>> > >
>> > > P.S I was hoping this talk was going to be accepted at ApacheCon but
>> my
>> > > other incubator talk got accepted instead. So looks like I have to
>> work
>> > on
>> > > that and submit it here now ;-)
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Sönke Liebau
> Partner
> Tel. +49 179 7940878
> OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
>
--
Sönke Liebau
Partner
Tel. +49 179 7940878
OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> BTW, we're voting in the discussion thread. Should we cast votes in the
> vote thread, as well?
We’re actually discussing in the Vote thread but never mind. There's 3 +1 vote here so all is good. I’ll put it up for vote at the IPMC tomorrow.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org>.
Ok, thanks for explaining. If it seems ok to keep placeholders there, it is
also Ok from my perspective.
BTW, we're voting in the discussion thread. Should we cast votes in the
vote thread, as well?
сб, 8 июн. 2019 г. в 09:13, Sönke Liebau <soenke.liebau@opencore.com.invalid
>:
> Hi Justin,
>
> thanks for explaining! +1 from me (binding).
>
> Best regards,
> Sönke
>
> Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> schrieb am Sa., 8. Juni 2019, 02:07:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
> > > originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there?
> >
> > It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were
> > replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to
> > NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights)
> >
> > > 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this
> > project
> > > contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the
> MIT
> > > license. Should that not be in the Notice file?
> >
> > License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2]
> >
> > > In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused
> > :)
> > > "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
> >
> > That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike
> > this release.
> >
> > > "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an
> Apache
> > > product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache
> License,
> > > and sometimes more." [3]
> >
> > Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release
> > does.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Sönke Liebau <so...@opencore.com.INVALID>.
Hi Justin,
thanks for explaining! +1 from me (binding).
Best regards,
Sönke
Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> schrieb am Sa., 8. Juni 2019, 02:07:
> Hi,
>
> > 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
> > originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there?
>
> It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were
> replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to
> NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights)
>
> > 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this
> project
> > contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
> > license. Should that not be in the Notice file?
>
> License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2]
>
> > In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused
> :)
> > "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
>
> That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike
> this release.
>
> > "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
> > product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
> > and sometimes more." [3]
>
> Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release
> does.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
>
Re: [REULT][VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process
1.0 (incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Ah, I saw src when downloading the rc and assumed was code/things from
> git. That's a facepalm: didn't look close enough.
The contents of the release are from git but it just a subset of it not all of it.
> It also just clicked now the important of the voting process (after what is
> probably way too long of time!). Releases constitute public facing and
> overall project approved version.
Yep :-)
> What is in git only had to pass whatever permissions needed from the bar to permit the commit.
Also could possibly contain all sorts of unknown licensing or IP issue.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [REULT][VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process
1.0 (incubating) RC2
Posted by Austin Bennett <au...@apache.org>.
Ah, I saw src when downloading the rc and assumed was code/things from
git. That's a facepalm: didn't look close enough.
It also just clicked now the important of the voting process (after what is
probably way too long of time!). Releases constitute public facing and
overall project approved version. What is in git only had to pass whatever
permissions needed from the bar to permit the commit. Weirdly feels like
an epiphany... :-)
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 8:04 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I have followed the thread/vote, but it seems strange to think of their
> > being 'releases' for an aggregate of these artifacts.
>
> It what way? This is a release of a single thing set of slides not an
> aggregate. It what in the release artefact that counts not what is in git.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: [REULT][VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process
1.0 (incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I have followed the thread/vote, but it seems strange to think of their
> being 'releases' for an aggregate of these artifacts.
It what way? This is a release of a single thing set of slides not an aggregate. It what in the release artefact that counts not what is in git.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [REULT][VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process
1.0 (incubating) RC2
Posted by Austin Bennett <au...@apache.org>.
I have followed the thread/vote, but it seems strange to think of their
being 'releases' for an aggregate of these artifacts. It will probably
take a moment for me to wrap head around; otherwise, yes, all good. Hooray
for first step of passing vote!
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 6:03 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> And the vote passed with 3 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
> +1 Sönke Liebau
> +1 Lars Francke
> +1 Justin Mclean
>
> Two of those people are on the IPMC.
>
> There was one other vote:
> +0.9 Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> Thanks, for everyone who took the time to look, vote and provide feedback.
> I’ll now ask the IPMC to vote on it.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
[REULT][VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
And the vote passed with 3 +1 votes and no -1 votes.
+1 Sönke Liebau
+1 Lars Francke
+1 Justin Mclean
Two of those people are on the IPMC.
There was one other vote:
+0.9 Dmitriy Pavlov
Thanks, for everyone who took the time to look, vote and provide feedback. I’ll now ask the IPMC to vote on it.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019, 02:07 Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
> > originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there?
>
> It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were
> replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to
> NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights)
>
Ah, so I need to do the same for the Zookeeper stuff then I guess.
>
> > 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this
> project
> > contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
> > license. Should that not be in the Notice file?
>
> License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2]
>
> > In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused
> :)
> > "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
>
> That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike
> this release.
>
> > "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
> > product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
> > and sometimes more." [3]
>
> Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release
> does.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> "If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it,
> the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either:
> a) remove such notices, or
> b) move them to the NOTICE file associated with each applicable project
> release, or
> c) provide written permission for the ASF to make such removal or
> relocation of the notices."
>
> So if you had chosen to do so you could have just removed the copyright
> notice.
Yep that’s also an option, most projects I worked with (including incubating projects) have selected b). You see a copyright line from original IP owner in most NOTICE files.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 2:07 AM Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
> > originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there?
>
> It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were
> replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to
> NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights)
>
I read this different. In your link [1] it says:
"If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it,
the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either:
a) remove such notices, or
b) move them to the NOTICE file associated with each applicable project
release, or
c) provide written permission for the ASF to make such removal or
relocation of the notices."
So if you had chosen to do so you could have just removed the copyright
notice.
> 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this project
> > contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
> > license. Should that not be in the Notice file?
>
> License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2]
>
> > In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused
> :)
> > "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
>
> That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike
> this release.
>
> > "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
> > product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
> > and sometimes more." [3]
>
> Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release
> does.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> 1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
> originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there?
It’s required by ASF policy yes. The original copyright notices were replaces with ASF ones and in that case you need to add the copyright to NOTICE. [1] (also [2] where it mentions relocated copyrights)
> 2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this project
> contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
> license. Should that not be in the Notice file?
License stuff goes in LICENSE not in NOTICE. [2]
> In the docs I found the following two sentences, which have me confused :)
> "LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
That for the case where you have no 3rd party bundled item inside, unlike this release.
> "The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
> product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
> and sometimes more." [3]
Thats for the case where we have 3rd part dependancies, like this release does.
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Sönke Liebau <so...@opencore.com.INVALID>.
Hi Justin,
sorry for the long time it took, but I finally had a look at the release
candidate.
Overall it looks good to me, I checked the signatures, built it and looked
at regulatory files.
I do have two questions on the NOTICE and LICENSE file though:
1. in NOTICE there is a sentence that mentions that this content was
originally developed by you. Is that legally required to be there? I
absolutely don't want to remove your name from the material as original
author, but when looking at the Apache docs for assembling a NOTICE file it
said to not put anything in there that is not legally required [1], which
got me wondering.
2. At the bottom of the License file, there is a section that this project
contains parts of the reveal.js framework which is licensed under the MIT
license. Should that not be in the Notice file? In the docs I found the
following two sentences, which have me confused :)
"LICENSE should contain the text of the ALv2 -- no more, no less." [2]
"The LICENSE file communicates the licensing of all content in an Apache
product distribution. It always contains the text of the Apache License,
and sometimes more." [3]
Probably both nits/non-issues, but wanted to briefly clarify.
Best regards,
Sönke
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice
[2] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple
[3] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#overview-of-files
On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 19:07, Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dmitriy,
>
> thanks for checking!
>
> The "your name" stuff came at my request.
> Justin had his personal details in there (e.g. Justin McLean, etc.) and in
> my opinion the material should be anonymous. Similar to code where we don't
> have any @author tags.
> So Justin removed the information. I'd be in favor of entirely removing
> those slides but I'm fine with the current solution as well.
>
> As to the other one: Just reading that sentence makes sense to me. I just
> looked at the slide and I think it's fine.
> Looking at the title of the slide "Why we have an incubating process" this
> one could begin with "To ensure" but I believe it's fine the way it is.
>
> The decision is yours but if that's everything you dislike I'd suggest we
> can fix/change it post-release.
>
> Cheers,
> Lars
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:44 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Justin, Training developers,
> >
> > +0.9 (PPMC Binding),
> > Checked license, notice readme and build from sources.
> >
> > I have only one remark. Generated slides in
> >
> >
> /apache-training-navigating-ASF-incubation-1.0-incubating/target/generated-slides/index.html
> > contain
> > The first slide contains:
> > ```Your Name
> > Your Job title
> > Your email```
> >
> > The second slide contains
> > ```Who am I?
> > TODO Fill in your own your info here```
> >
> > One from the next slide contains
> > ```Ensure that decision making is done in the open``` <- Phrase seems to
> be
> > incomplete.
> >
> > Sincerely
> > Dmitriy Pavlov
> >
> > пт, 7 июн. 2019 г. в 10:28, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks now we only need one more +1. Anyone?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Justin
> > >
> > > P.S I was hoping this talk was going to be accepted at ApacheCon but my
> > > other incubator talk got accepted instead. So looks like I have to work
> > on
> > > that and submit it here now ;-)
> >
>
--
Sönke Liebau
Partner
Tel. +49 179 7940878
OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dmitriy,
thanks for checking!
The "your name" stuff came at my request.
Justin had his personal details in there (e.g. Justin McLean, etc.) and in
my opinion the material should be anonymous. Similar to code where we don't
have any @author tags.
So Justin removed the information. I'd be in favor of entirely removing
those slides but I'm fine with the current solution as well.
As to the other one: Just reading that sentence makes sense to me. I just
looked at the slide and I think it's fine.
Looking at the title of the slide "Why we have an incubating process" this
one could begin with "To ensure" but I believe it's fine the way it is.
The decision is yours but if that's everything you dislike I'd suggest we
can fix/change it post-release.
Cheers,
Lars
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:44 PM Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, Justin, Training developers,
>
> +0.9 (PPMC Binding),
> Checked license, notice readme and build from sources.
>
> I have only one remark. Generated slides in
>
> /apache-training-navigating-ASF-incubation-1.0-incubating/target/generated-slides/index.html
> contain
> The first slide contains:
> ```Your Name
> Your Job title
> Your email```
>
> The second slide contains
> ```Who am I?
> TODO Fill in your own your info here```
>
> One from the next slide contains
> ```Ensure that decision making is done in the open``` <- Phrase seems to be
> incomplete.
>
> Sincerely
> Dmitriy Pavlov
>
> пт, 7 июн. 2019 г. в 10:28, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks now we only need one more +1. Anyone?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > P.S I was hoping this talk was going to be accepted at ApacheCon but my
> > other incubator talk got accepted instead. So looks like I have to work
> on
> > that and submit it here now ;-)
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> I have only one remark. Generated slides in
> /apache-training-navigating-ASF-incubation-1.0-incubating/target/generated-slides/index.html
> contain
> The first slide contains:
> ```Your Name
> Your Job title
> Your email```
>
> The second slide contains
> ```Who am I?
> TODO Fill in your own your info here```
It also mentioned in the README, it’s place holder for people to put something about themselves.
> One from the next slide contains
> ```Ensure that decision making is done in the open``` <- Phrase seems to be
> incomplete.
Reads OK to me.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org>.
Hi, Justin, Training developers,
+0.9 (PPMC Binding),
Checked license, notice readme and build from sources.
I have only one remark. Generated slides in
/apache-training-navigating-ASF-incubation-1.0-incubating/target/generated-slides/index.html
contain
The first slide contains:
```Your Name
Your Job title
Your email```
The second slide contains
```Who am I?
TODO Fill in your own your info here```
One from the next slide contains
```Ensure that decision making is done in the open``` <- Phrase seems to be
incomplete.
Sincerely
Dmitriy Pavlov
пт, 7 июн. 2019 г. в 10:28, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks now we only need one more +1. Anyone?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> P.S I was hoping this talk was going to be accepted at ApacheCon but my
> other incubator talk got accepted instead. So looks like I have to work on
> that and submit it here now ;-)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Thanks now we only need one more +1. Anyone?
Thanks,
Justin
P.S I was hoping this talk was going to be accepted at ApacheCon but my other incubator talk got accepted instead. So looks like I have to work on that and submit it here now ;-)
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
Looks good to me: +1
I get a warning when building:
[WARNING]
[WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective model
for org.apache.training:navigating-ASF-incubation:war:1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
[WARNING] 'build.plugins.plugin.(groupId:artifactId)' must be unique but
found duplicate declaration of plugin
com.coderplus.maven.plugins:copy-rename-maven-plugin @ line 304, column 21
[WARNING]
[WARNING] It is highly recommended to fix these problems because they
threaten the stability of your build.
[WARNING]
[WARNING] For this reason, future Maven versions might no longer support
building such malformed projects.
[WARNING]
but that's not a blocker for a release.
The only comment I have (but the +1 stands) is that this is a 1.0.0 release
(with which I'm fine as well), I'm just not sure if patch & maintenance
releases make much sense for content. I think releasing it as 1, 2, 3, etc.
would be fine as well.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:32 PM Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry, I haven't gotten around to it yet either but it's on my list.
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:22 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > can we extend the timeframe for voting?
>>
>> No need, i'st a minimum of 72 hours and hangs about until we get enough
>> votes or decide to make a new release candidate.
>>
>> > I could check this release but I need more time since I'm new to this.
>> > Usually, I check RCs by doing minimal testing, but I'd like to learn how
>> > PMCs should check releases.
>>
>> The checklist I provided shod help but if you have any questions or
>> unsure about anything just ask. It will also get checked by the IPMC so
>> they may find something we miss.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Justin
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Lars Francke <la...@gmail.com>.
I'm sorry, I haven't gotten around to it yet either but it's on my list.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:22 PM Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > can we extend the timeframe for voting?
>
> No need, i'st a minimum of 72 hours and hangs about until we get enough
> votes or decide to make a new release candidate.
>
> > I could check this release but I need more time since I'm new to this.
> > Usually, I check RCs by doing minimal testing, but I'd like to learn how
> > PMCs should check releases.
>
> The checklist I provided shod help but if you have any questions or unsure
> about anything just ask. It will also get checked by the IPMC so they may
> find something we miss.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> can we extend the timeframe for voting?
No need, i'st a minimum of 72 hours and hangs about until we get enough votes or decide to make a new release candidate.
> I could check this release but I need more time since I'm new to this.
> Usually, I check RCs by doing minimal testing, but I'd like to learn how
> PMCs should check releases.
The checklist I provided shod help but if you have any questions or unsure about anything just ask. It will also get checked by the IPMC so they may find something we miss.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Dmitriy Pavlov <dp...@apache.org>.
Hi Justin,
can we extend the timeframe for voting?
I could check this release but I need more time since I'm new to this.
Usually, I check RCs by doing minimal testing, but I'd like to learn how
PMCs should check releases.
Sincerely,
Dmitriy Pavlov
вс, 2 июн. 2019 г. в 12:11, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (IPMC binding)
>
> I checked the release:
> - incubating in artefact name
> - signatures and hashes fine
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - LICENSE and NOTICE good
> - no unexpected binaries in release
> - all source files have ASF headers
> - can compile from source
>
> Compiled result looks good to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Navigating the ASF Incubator Process 1.0
(incubating) RC2
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
+1 (IPMC binding)
I checked the release:
- incubating in artefact name
- signatures and hashes fine
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE good
- no unexpected binaries in release
- all source files have ASF headers
- can compile from source
Compiled result looks good to me.
Thanks,
Justin