You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Dawid Wysakowicz (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/01/10 14:46:00 UTC

[jira] [Closed] (FLINK-12004) Consider about POJO using method chaining when extract TypeInformation

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dawid Wysakowicz closed FLINK-12004.
------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.11.0
       Resolution: Implemented

Implemented in fb12bcfaa82e10fb85e5f4c45e5d9ab503a3d891

> Consider about POJO using method chaining when extract TypeInformation
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-12004
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-12004
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: API / DataStream, API / Type Serialization System
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.2
>            Reporter: jiawei chen
>            Assignee: jiawei chen
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> I have a POJO class using method chaining such as :
> {code:java}
> public static class CustomChainingPojoType {
> private String myField1;
> private int myField2;
> public CustomChainingPojoType() {
> }
> public CustomChainingPojoType setMyField1(String myField1) {
> this.myField1 = myField1;
> return this;
> }
> public CustomChainingPojoType setMyField2(int myField2) {
> this.myField2 = myField2;
> return this;
> }
> public String getMyField1() {
> return myField1;
> }
> public int getMyField2() {
> return myField2;
> }
> }{code}
>  
> It can not be analyze as POJO in TypeExtractor because the set method return type is not Void, How about add a condition that return type can be class self.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)