You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by "Stefano Bagnara (JIRA)" <se...@james.apache.org> on 2006/07/27 19:47:14 UTC
[jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released packages confusions (name,
artifacts)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582?page=comments#action_12423875 ]
Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-582:
---------------------------------------
Furthermore Norman noted that in our rc1 src distro there are javadocs in the www folder.
I think this is a lack in our build system: I see that some of our src releases include the www folder with some parts of the website, other releases don't include this one.
Should we try to fix this for 2.3.0? What would we like to include and in what packages?
> Released packages confusions (name, artifacts)
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JAMES-582
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582
> Project: James
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: Build System
> Affects Versions: 2.3.0rc1
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> We currently name "james-*" our releases.
> 1) We should rename them to add at least "server" => james-server-*
> 2) Currenlty james-XXX-src.* and james-with-phoenix-XXX-src.* are the same thing: why do we need 2? what would be the intended difference? I would like to remove the james-with-phoenix-XXX-src from our release.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Release packaging (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released packages
confusions (name, artifacts))
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Please, as we are in rc and we may want to make a new release soon,
comment this issue.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582
Stefano
Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582?page=comments#action_12423875 ]
>
> Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-582:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Furthermore Norman noted that in our rc1 src distro there are javadocs in the www folder.
>
> I think this is a lack in our build system: I see that some of our src releases include the www folder with some parts of the website, other releases don't include this one.
>
> Should we try to fix this for 2.3.0? What would we like to include and in what packages?
>
>
>> Released packages confusions (name, artifacts)
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: JAMES-582
>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582
>> Project: James
>> Issue Type: Wish
>> Components: Build System
>> Affects Versions: 2.3.0rc1
>> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
>> Priority: Minor
>> Fix For: 2.3.0
>>
>>
>> We currently name "james-*" our releases.
>> 1) We should rename them to add at least "server" => james-server-*
>> 2) Currenlty james-XXX-src.* and james-with-phoenix-XXX-src.* are the same thing: why do we need 2? what would be the intended difference? I would like to remove the james-with-phoenix-XXX-src from our release.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
RE: Release packaging (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released packages confusions (name, artifacts))
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> The src packages contains the build.xml but they don't include all of
> the property files used by build.xml.
So we should, as you say "make sure we include everything is needed to build
it."
> > About the src packages my main need is to remove the src-with-phoenix as
> > it is identical to src and it does not contain phoenix.
Then we could fix it so that it does include phoenix, which was the intent.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: Release packaging (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released
packages confusions (name, artifacts))
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
I found further problems about the packages.
The src packages contains the build.xml but they don't include all of
the property files used by build.xml.
So we have to remove also the build.xml or make sure we include
everything is needed to build it.
IMHO this is a blocker to 2.3.0 final.
Stefano
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Norman Maurer wrote:
>> I think we should add only a docs folder which holds the javadocs (only
>> in src). Thats all.
>
> About the src packages my main need is to remove the src-with-phoenix as
> it is identical to src and it does not contain phoenix.
> About the docs you want to add I don't have problems either way: I
> expect that developers that downloads the sources are able to run "ant
> website" and "ant javadocs".
>
> About the binary packages instead I think we could add docs (website)
> also to the default bin.
>
> Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: Release packaging (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released
packages confusions (name, artifacts))
Posted by Norman Maurer <nm...@byteaction.de>.
You are right its a blocker! We should include all property files..
bye
Norman
Am Sonntag, den 30.07.2006, 14:29 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> I found further problems about the packages.
> The src packages contains the build.xml but they don't include all of
> the property files used by build.xml.
>
> So we have to remove also the build.xml or make sure we include
> everything is needed to build it.
>
> IMHO this is a blocker to 2.3.0 final.
>
> Stefano
>
> Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > Norman Maurer wrote:
> >> I think we should add only a docs folder which holds the javadocs (only
> >> in src). Thats all.
> >
> > About the src packages my main need is to remove the src-with-phoenix as
> > it is identical to src and it does not contain phoenix.
> > About the docs you want to add I don't have problems either way: I
> > expect that developers that downloads the sources are able to run "ant
> > website" and "ant javadocs".
> >
> > About the binary packages instead I think we could add docs (website)
> > also to the default bin.
> >
> > Stefano
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
> !EXCUBATOR:1,44cca66043381119011798!
Re: Release packaging (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released
packages confusions (name, artifacts))
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Norman Maurer wrote:
> I think we should add only a docs folder which holds the javadocs (only
> in src). Thats all.
About the src packages my main need is to remove the src-with-phoenix as
it is identical to src and it does not contain phoenix.
About the docs you want to add I don't have problems either way: I
expect that developers that downloads the sources are able to run "ant
website" and "ant javadocs".
About the binary packages instead I think we could add docs (website)
also to the default bin.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: Release packaging (Was: [jira] Commented: (JAMES-582) Released
packages confusions (name, artifacts))
Posted by Norman Maurer <nm...@byteaction.de>.
I think we should add only a docs folder which holds the javadocs (only
in src). Thats all.
bye
Norman
Am Samstag, den 29.07.2006, 19:46 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
> Please, as we are in rc and we may want to make a new release soon,
> comment this issue.
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582
>
> Stefano
>
> Stefano Bagnara (JIRA) wrote:
> > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582?page=comments#action_12423875 ]
> >
> > Stefano Bagnara commented on JAMES-582:
> > ---------------------------------------
> >
> > Furthermore Norman noted that in our rc1 src distro there are javadocs in the www folder.
> >
> > I think this is a lack in our build system: I see that some of our src releases include the www folder with some parts of the website, other releases don't include this one.
> >
> > Should we try to fix this for 2.3.0? What would we like to include and in what packages?
> >
> >
> >> Released packages confusions (name, artifacts)
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Key: JAMES-582
> >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-582
> >> Project: James
> >> Issue Type: Wish
> >> Components: Build System
> >> Affects Versions: 2.3.0rc1
> >> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> >> Priority: Minor
> >> Fix For: 2.3.0
> >>
> >>
> >> We currently name "james-*" our releases.
> >> 1) We should rename them to add at least "server" => james-server-*
> >> 2) Currenlty james-XXX-src.* and james-with-phoenix-XXX-src.* are the same thing: why do we need 2? what would be the intended difference? I would like to remove the james-with-phoenix-XXX-src from our release.
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
> !EXCUBATOR:1,44cb9f2343385531625449!