You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> on 2023/07/29 18:25:28 UTC
[VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Hello everyone,
I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
Most of the discussion happened in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
[DISCUSS} and https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
[VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
way. This vote is about all three of them.
Please vote:
[a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
[b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
[0] - no opinion
Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
be preinstalled.
The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
J.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
The vote is concluded. Unanimous decision on a) - we are not going to
pre-install the daskexecutor, celery, cncf.kubernetes providers.
Binding votes: 9 (a)
Jarek Potiuk, Ash Berlin-Taylor, Hussein Awala, Pierre Jeambrun,
Vincent Beck, Jed Cunningham, Dennis Ferruzzi, Vikram Koka, Elad Kalif
Non binding votes: 6 (a)
Collin McNulty, Pankaj Koti, Avi, Wei Lee, rahul Vats, Amogh Desai,
Thanks to everyone who voted and expressed their opinion
J.
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 9:53 AM Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I also vote for [a]
>
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > I am a little torn on this, but with the separation already in place, I
> > would also vote for option (a).
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:48 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis
> > <fe...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say [a]. If the intent is to be
> > > executor/service agnostic then this makes the most sense to me.
> > >
> > >
> > > - ferruzzi
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 9:39 AM
> > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery
> > > providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know
> > > the content is safe.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm also in favor of option a.
> > >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>.
I also vote for [a]
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 8:40 AM Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> I am a little torn on this, but with the separation already in place, I
> would also vote for option (a).
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:48 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis
> <fe...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say [a]. If the intent is to be
> > executor/service agnostic then this makes the most sense to me.
> >
> >
> > - ferruzzi
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 9:39 AM
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery
> > providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm also in favor of option a.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
I am a little torn on this, but with the separation already in place, I
would also vote for option (a).
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:48 PM Ferruzzi, Dennis
<fe...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote:
> Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say [a]. If the intent is to be
> executor/service agnostic then this makes the most sense to me.
>
>
> - ferruzzi
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 9:39 AM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery
> providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> I'm also in favor of option a.
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by "Ferruzzi, Dennis" <fe...@amazon.com.INVALID>.
Pretty unanimous so far, but I'll also say [a]. If the intent is to be executor/service agnostic then this makes the most sense to me.
- ferruzzi
________________________________
From: Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 9:39 AM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
I'm also in favor of option a.
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Jed Cunningham <je...@apache.org>.
I'm also in favor of option a.
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by "Beck, Vincent" <vi...@amazon.com.INVALID>.
I vote for a
On 2023-07-30, 12:24 AM, "Amogh Desai" <amoghdesai.oss@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
I also think that these operators should not be pre installed.
I vote for option (a)
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, 09:22 rahul Vats <rah.sharma11@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Option a,
>
>
> Regards ,
> Rahul Vats
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, <weilee.rx@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > [a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi <abhishek.bhakat@astronomer.io.INVA <ma...@astronomer.io.INVA>LID
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > option a (non-binding)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io <https://canarymail.io>)
> > >
> > >> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun <
> > pierrejbrun@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> (mailto:pierrejbrun@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>)> wrote:
> > >> Option a
> > >>
> > >> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <hussein@awala.fr <ma...@awala.fr>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I vote for option a
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <ash@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Option a.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _ash
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com <ma...@potiuk.com>>
> wrote:
> > >>>>> Hello everyone,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we
> should
> > >>>>> pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Most of the discussion happened in
> > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6 <https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6>
> > >>>>> [DISCUSS} and
> > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv <https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv>
> > >>>>> [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the
> > discussion it
> > >>>>> was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the
> same
> > >>>>> way. This vote is about all three of them.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not
> preinstalled
> > >>>>> [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [0] - no opinion
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should
> > not
> > >>>>> be preinstalled.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png <https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png> is also a screenshot
> > >>>>> showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one
> > of
> > >>>>> those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> > >>>>> raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> J.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org <ma...@airflow.apache.org>
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org <ma...@airflow.apache.org>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org <ma...@airflow.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org <ma...@airflow.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
I also think that these operators should not be pre installed.
I vote for option (a)
Thanks,
Amogh Desai
On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, 09:22 rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Option a,
>
>
> Regards ,
> Rahul Vats
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > [a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi <abhishek.bhakat@astronomer.io.INVALID
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > option a (non-binding)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io)
> > >
> > >> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun <
> > pierrejbrun@gmail.com (mailto:pierrejbrun@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > >> Option a
> > >>
> > >> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I vote for option a
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Option a.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _ash
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>> Hello everyone,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we
> should
> > >>>>> pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Most of the discussion happened in
> > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> > >>>>> [DISCUSS} and
> > >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> > >>>>> [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the
> > discussion it
> > >>>>> was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the
> same
> > >>>>> way. This vote is about all three of them.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not
> preinstalled
> > >>>>> [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [0] - no opinion
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should
> > not
> > >>>>> be preinstalled.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> > >>>>> showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one
> > of
> > >>>>> those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> > >>>>> raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> J.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com>.
Option a,
Regards ,
Rahul Vats
On Sun, 30 Jul, 2023, 08:09 Wei Lee, <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> wrote:
> >
> > option a (non-binding)
> >
> > --
> > Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io)
> >
> >> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun <
> pierrejbrun@gmail.com (mailto:pierrejbrun@gmail.com)> wrote:
> >> Option a
> >>
> >> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I vote for option a
> >>>
> >>> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Option a.
> >>>>
> >>>> _ash
> >>>>
> >>>> On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Hello everyone,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
> >>>>> pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Most of the discussion happened in
> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> >>>>> [DISCUSS} and
> >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> >>>>> [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the
> discussion it
> >>>>> was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
> >>>>> way. This vote is about all three of them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
> >>>>> [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [0] - no opinion
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should
> not
> >>>>> be preinstalled.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> >>>>> showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one
> of
> >>>>> those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> >>>>> raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> J.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>.
[a] the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled (non-binding)
Best,
Wei
> On Jul 30, 2023, at 4:47 AM, Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>
> option a (non-binding)
>
> --
> Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io)
>
>> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun <pierrejbrun@gmail.com (mailto:pierrejbrun@gmail.com)> wrote:
>> Option a
>>
>> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> I vote for option a
>>>
>>> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Option a.
>>>>
>>>> _ash
>>>>
>>>> On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
>>>>> pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most of the discussion happened in
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
>>>>> [DISCUSS} and
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
>>>>> [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
>>>>> was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
>>>>> way. This vote is about all three of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
>>>>> [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] - no opinion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
>>>>> be preinstalled.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
>>>>>
>>>>> Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
>>>>> showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
>>>>> those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
>>>>> raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
>>>>>
>>>>> J.
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Avi <ab...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
option a (non-binding)
--
Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io)
> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun <pierrejbrun@gmail.com (mailto:pierrejbrun@gmail.com)> wrote:
> Option a
>
> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> > I vote for option a
> >
> > On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Option a.
> > >
> > > _ash
> > >
> > > On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
> > > > pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> > > >
> > > > Most of the discussion happened in
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> > > > [DISCUSS} and
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> > > > [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
> > > > was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
> > > > way. This vote is about all three of them.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
> > > > [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> > > >
> > > > [0] - no opinion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
> > > > be preinstalled.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> > > >
> > > > Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> > > > showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
> > > > those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> > > > raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> > > >
> > > > J.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Pierre Jeambrun <pi...@gmail.com>.
Option a
On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
> I vote for option a
>
> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Option a.
> >
> > _ash
> >
> > On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >Hello everyone,
> > >
> > >I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
> > >pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> > >
> > >Most of the discussion happened in
> > >https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> > >[DISCUSS} and
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> > >[VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
> > >was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
> > >way. This vote is about all three of them.
> > >
> > >Please vote:
> > >
> > >[a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
> > >[b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> > >
> > >[0] - no opinion
> > >
> > >
> > >Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
> > >be preinstalled.
> > >
> > >The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> > >
> > >Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> > >showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
> > >those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> > >raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> > >
> > >J.
> > >
> > >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>.
I vote for option a
On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> Option a.
>
> _ash
>
> On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
> >pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> >
> >Most of the discussion happened in
> >https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> >[DISCUSS} and
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> >[VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
> >was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
> >way. This vote is about all three of them.
> >
> >Please vote:
> >
> >[a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
> >[b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> >
> >[0] - no opinion
> >
> >
> >Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
> >be preinstalled.
> >
> >The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> >
> >Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> >showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
> >those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> >raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> >
> >J.
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>.
Option a.
_ash
On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>Hello everyone,
>
>I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
>pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
>
>Most of the discussion happened in
>https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
>[DISCUSS} and https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
>[VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
>was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
>way. This vote is about all three of them.
>
>Please vote:
>
>[a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
>[b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
>
>[0] - no opinion
>
>
>Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
>be preinstalled.
>
>The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
>
>Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
>showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
>those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
>raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
>
>J.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Pankaj Koti <pa...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
[a] (non-binding)
Regards,
Pankaj Koti
*Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
Location: Pune, India
Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
Email: pankaj.koti@astronomer.io
Mobile: +91 9730079985
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 11:55 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
> pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
>
> Most of the discussion happened in
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> [DISCUSS} and
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
> was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
> way. This vote is about all three of them.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
> [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
>
> [0] - no opinion
>
>
> Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
> be preinstalled.
>
> The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
>
> Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
> those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
>
> J.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] The daskexecutor, cncf.provider, celery providers in 2.7.0. as regular not-preinstalled providers
Posted by Collin McNulty <co...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
I vote for a. Non-binding.