You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com> on 2022/02/16 08:21:30 UTC

Re: Re: Java 17 and Tomee Containers

Hi,

could anyone merge it?
I would also like to see Java17 images.

Best Regards,
Thomas

Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
JENKIR14@nationwide.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I have created the PR for the OpenJDK.
>
> https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/59
>
> I would encourage folks to test this new build.
>
> If the community decides they want OpenJDK,  approve the request and I
> will update the official images in dockerhub.
>
> Thank you,
> Rod.
>
>
> On 1/24/22, 11:32 AM, "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <JE...@nationwide.com>
> wrote:
>
>     Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email.
> Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding.
> (Sender: dev-return-28786-JENKIR14=nationwide.com@tomee.apache.org)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>     Hello,
>
>     If we use Temurin, I would recommend the tag 17-jre-focal.  That uses
> Ubuntu for an OS, very slight change in OS.
>
>     If we decide on OpenJDK, I would recommend the tag 17-jdk-bullseye.
> Currently, we are using 11-jre.  11-jre is Debian Bullseye.  We would be
> consistent with the OS
>
>     I would recommend 17-jdk-bullseye.  It keeps us more constant with the
> OS, even though it is larger than a jre.  I am going to move down this path
> unless anyone objects.
>
>     Do we need a vote for something like this?
>
>     Thank you,
>     Rod Jenkins
>
>
>     On 1/14/22, 10:49 AM, "Anbu Sampath" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>         Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
> email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
> responding. (Sender: dev-return-28764-JENKIR14=
> nationwide.com@tomee.apache.org)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>         Hi All,
>
>         Eclipse Temurin started producing JRE, I guess TomEE can use it
> for Java 17.
>
>         https://blog.adoptium.net/2021/12/eclipse-temurin-jres-are-back/
>
>         Regards
>         Anbu
>
>
>         On Thu, 13 Jan, 2022, 03:49 Jean-Louis Monteiro, <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
>         wrote:
>
>         > No, I was referring to what Rod was proposing.
>         >
>         > Checkout the following https://adoptium.net/
>         > Eclipse OpenJ9 is discontinued because IBM is taking over with
> IBM Semeru.
>         >
>         > Adoptium and Eclipse Temurin aim at producing AdoptOpenJDK
> distributions.
>         >
>         > --
>         > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>         > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>         > http://www.tomitribe.com
>         >
>         >
>         > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:52 PM Alex The Rocker <
> alex.m3tal@gmail.com>
>         > wrote:
>         >
>         > > Hello Jean-Louis,
>         > >
>         > > Not sure what you mean by "Eclipse JRE", but maybe it's IBM
> Semeru
>         > > Runtimes JRE, which is based on Eclipse OpenJ9 (IBM Semer open
> edition
>         > > was previously branded as "AdoptOpenJDK OpenJ9").
>         > >
>         > > That's what we use both our our container & VM based services
>         > >
>         > > Hope it helps,
>         > >
>         > > Alex
>         > >
>         > > Le mer. 12 janv. 2022 à 22:05, Jean-Louis Monteiro
>         > > <jl...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
>         > > >
>         > > > Hi Rod,
>         > > >
>         > > > We can try the Eclipse JRE, at least for our own knowledge.
>         > > > For the Docker images, I'd probably go with OpenJDK for
> consistency in
>         > > > behavior even though it's bigger than JRE
>         > > > --
>         > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>         > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>         > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:12 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
>         > > > JENKIR14@nationwide.com> wrote:
>         > > >
>         > > > > Hello all,
>         > > > >
>         > > > > I am working on the Java17 TomEE containers.  The other
> TomEE 8
>         > > containers
>         > > > > use 11-jre or 8-jre tags from OpenJDK.  However, OpenJDK
> did not
>         > > release a
>         > > > > jre for 17.  All I see is 17-jdk.
>         > > > >
>         > > > > I think we need a discussion on what we want to do.  Here
> are a
>         > couple
>         > > > > options:
>         > > > >
>         > > > >
>         > > > >   1.  Use OpenJDK 17-jdk
>         > > > >   2.  Use Eclipse Temurin 17-jre
>         > > > >
>         > > > > I am going to test with option #2.  If anyone would like
> to throw out
>         > > > > other options, that would be great.
>         > > > >
>         > > > > Thank you,
>         > > > > Rod Jenkins
>         > > > >
>         > >
>         >
>
>
>

Re: Re: Java 17 and Tomee Containers

Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Should be ok

Le mer. 16 févr. 2022 à 09:21, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> could anyone merge it?
> I would also like to see Java17 images.
>
> Best Regards,
> Thomas
>
> Am Do., 27. Jan. 2022 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
> JENKIR14@nationwide.com>:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have created the PR for the OpenJDK.
> >
> > https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/59
> >
> > I would encourage folks to test this new build.
> >
> > If the community decides they want OpenJDK,  approve the request and I
> > will update the official images in dockerhub.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Rod.
> >
> >
> > On 1/24/22, 11:32 AM, "Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)" <
> JENKIR14@nationwide.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >     Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email.
> > Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or responding.
> > (Sender: dev-return-28786-JENKIR14=nationwide.com@tomee.apache.org)
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >     Hello,
> >
> >     If we use Temurin, I would recommend the tag 17-jre-focal.  That uses
> > Ubuntu for an OS, very slight change in OS.
> >
> >     If we decide on OpenJDK, I would recommend the tag 17-jdk-bullseye.
> > Currently, we are using 11-jre.  11-jre is Debian Bullseye.  We would be
> > consistent with the OS
> >
> >     I would recommend 17-jdk-bullseye.  It keeps us more constant with
> the
> > OS, even though it is larger than a jre.  I am going to move down this
> path
> > unless anyone objects.
> >
> >     Do we need a vote for something like this?
> >
> >     Thank you,
> >     Rod Jenkins
> >
> >
> >     On 1/14/22, 10:49 AM, "Anbu Sampath" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >         Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL
> > email. Use CAUTION before clicking on links, opening attachments, or
> > responding. (Sender: dev-return-28764-JENKIR14=
> > nationwide.com@tomee.apache.org)
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >         Hi All,
> >
> >         Eclipse Temurin started producing JRE, I guess TomEE can use it
> > for Java 17.
> >
> >         https://blog.adoptium.net/2021/12/eclipse-temurin-jres-are-back/
> >
> >         Regards
> >         Anbu
> >
> >
> >         On Thu, 13 Jan, 2022, 03:49 Jean-Louis Monteiro, <
> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> >         wrote:
> >
> >         > No, I was referring to what Rod was proposing.
> >         >
> >         > Checkout the following https://adoptium.net/
> >         > Eclipse OpenJ9 is discontinued because IBM is taking over with
> > IBM Semeru.
> >         >
> >         > Adoptium and Eclipse Temurin aim at producing AdoptOpenJDK
> > distributions.
> >         >
> >         > --
> >         > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >         > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >         > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:52 PM Alex The Rocker <
> > alex.m3tal@gmail.com>
> >         > wrote:
> >         >
> >         > > Hello Jean-Louis,
> >         > >
> >         > > Not sure what you mean by "Eclipse JRE", but maybe it's IBM
> > Semeru
> >         > > Runtimes JRE, which is based on Eclipse OpenJ9 (IBM Semer
> open
> > edition
> >         > > was previously branded as "AdoptOpenJDK OpenJ9").
> >         > >
> >         > > That's what we use both our our container & VM based services
> >         > >
> >         > > Hope it helps,
> >         > >
> >         > > Alex
> >         > >
> >         > > Le mer. 12 janv. 2022 à 22:05, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >         > > <jl...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> >         > > >
> >         > > > Hi Rod,
> >         > > >
> >         > > > We can try the Eclipse JRE, at least for our own knowledge.
> >         > > > For the Docker images, I'd probably go with OpenJDK for
> > consistency in
> >         > > > behavior even though it's bigger than JRE
> >         > > > --
> >         > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >         > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >         > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >         > > >
> >         > > >
> >         > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 7:12 PM Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) <
> >         > > > JENKIR14@nationwide.com> wrote:
> >         > > >
> >         > > > > Hello all,
> >         > > > >
> >         > > > > I am working on the Java17 TomEE containers.  The other
> > TomEE 8
> >         > > containers
> >         > > > > use 11-jre or 8-jre tags from OpenJDK.  However, OpenJDK
> > did not
> >         > > release a
> >         > > > > jre for 17.  All I see is 17-jdk.
> >         > > > >
> >         > > > > I think we need a discussion on what we want to do.  Here
> > are a
> >         > couple
> >         > > > > options:
> >         > > > >
> >         > > > >
> >         > > > >   1.  Use OpenJDK 17-jdk
> >         > > > >   2.  Use Eclipse Temurin 17-jre
> >         > > > >
> >         > > > > I am going to test with option #2.  If anyone would like
> > to throw out
> >         > > > > other options, that would be great.
> >         > > > >
> >         > > > > Thank you,
> >         > > > > Rod Jenkins
> >         > > > >
> >         > >
> >         >
> >
> >
> >
>