You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@kudu.apache.org by "LiFu He (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/02/25 08:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (KUDU-3355) Move outdated range partitions directly to hdfs

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

LiFu He updated KUDU-3355:
--------------------------
    Summary: Move outdated range partitions directly to hdfs  (was: Move range partitions that are out of date to hdfs directly)

> Move outdated range partitions directly to hdfs
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KUDU-3355
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-3355
>             Project: Kudu
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: LiFu He
>            Priority: Minor
>
> There is a feature in ClickHouse that allows MergeTree table to move range partitions from local disks to remote storage(hdfs/s3).
> [https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/engines/table-engines/mergetree-family/mergetree/#table_engine-mergetree-creating-a-table]
> [https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/engines/table-engines/mergetree-family/mergetree/#mergetree-table-ttl]
> If kudu supports this type of functionarility, maybe it will make the combination of kudu and hdfs smoother, and even integrate into the data lake, compete with iceburg/hudi/delta.
> I have read [~granthenke]'s blog [Transparent Hierarchical Storage Management with Apache Kudu and Impala|https://blog.cloudera.com/transparent-hierarchical-storage-management-with-apache-kudu-and-impala/], thanks for his detailed description, but I think this feature is another option. 
> What's your opinion?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)