Re: Status of Spelt integration

[freerk55 <fr...@sibranda.net>]

The standard spell checker of Thunderbird works in eGroupware.
But not in Felamimail!!?? Why not?
How can I get it working as it does in the rest of eGroupware?

Freerk Jongsma



Toby Cole-2 wrote:
> 
> Hi Andrew,
> 	We ended up abandoning the spelt integration as the built in solr  
> spellchecking improved so much during our project. Also, if you did go  
> the route of using spelt, I'd implement it as a spellcheck plugin  
> (which didn't exist as a concept when we started trying to shoehorn  
> spelt into solr).
> Regards, Toby.
> 
> On 30 Nov 2009, at 11:29, Andrey Klochkov wrote:
> 
>> Hi all
>>
>> I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago  
>> Toby
>> Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr. Does
>> anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with  
>> Solr? Does
>> it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
>>
>> Some links on the subject:
>> http://markmail.org/message/cqt4qtzzwyceltqu#query:+page:1+mid:cqt4qtzzwyceltqu+state:results
>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=spelt#query:spelt+page:1+mid:krzofzojhg7hmms7+state:results
>> http://groups.google.com/group/spelt
>>
>> -- 
>> Andrew Klochkov
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> Grid Dynamics
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Status-of-Spelt-integration-tp26573196p26674324.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Status of Spelt integration

[Toby Cole <to...@semantico.com>]

I'm pretty sure this isn't a Solr related question.
Have you tried asking on the eGroupware mailing lists? http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=78745
Toby.

On 7 Dec 2009, at 08:52, freerk55 wrote:

>
> The standard spell checker of Thunderbird works in eGroupware.
> But not in Felamimail!!?? Why not?
> How can I get it working as it does in the rest of eGroupware?
>
> Freerk Jongsma
>
>
>
> Toby Cole-2 wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>> 	We ended up abandoning the spelt integration as the built in solr
>> spellchecking improved so much during our project. Also, if you did  
>> go
>> the route of using spelt, I'd implement it as a spellcheck plugin
>> (which didn't exist as a concept when we started trying to shoehorn
>> spelt into solr).
>> Regards, Toby.
>>
>> On 30 Nov 2009, at 11:29, Andrey Klochkov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago
>>> Toby
>>> Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr.  
>>> Does
>>> anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with
>>> Solr? Does
>>> it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
>>>
>>> Some links on the subject:
>>> http://markmail.org/message/cqt4qtzzwyceltqu#query:+page:1+mid:cqt4qtzzwyceltqu+state:results
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=spelt#query:spelt+page:1+mid:krzofzojhg7hmms7+state:results
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/spelt
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Andrew Klochkov
>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>> Grid Dynamics
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Status-of-Spelt-integration-tp26573196p26674324.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>