mod_perl and 2.0 ?

[bryan <br...@yahoo.com>]

Hi,

I am playing around with 2.0 and was looking to try
out some stuff with mod_perl.  However, as far as I
can tell mod_perl does not currently work with 2.0 (at
least, the CVS repository for mod_perl 2 does not seem
to have any code in it, just design docs).

Is this the right place to ask questions about that? 
Is this the right impression?

any assistance is apprciated.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: mod_perl and 2.0 ?

["Jeffrey W. Baker" <jw...@acm.org>]

bryan wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am playing around with 2.0 and was looking to try
> out some stuff with mod_perl.  However, as far as I
> can tell mod_perl does not currently work with 2.0 (at
> least, the CVS repository for mod_perl 2 does not seem
> to have any code in it, just design docs).

It doesn't work because it makes some assumptions about process model
that are no longer true, and it isn't aware of the changes to the module
interface.

> Is this the right place to ask questions about that?

Probably modperl@apache.org

> Is this the right impression?

Yes.  Doug MacEachern is going to start working on mod_perl 2.0
soonish.  I may be mistaken but I think his new employer (covalent) is
making mod_perl 2.0 development part of his job.

-jwb