You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/03 16:56:07 UTC
Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
L.S.,
As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.9
release instead.
We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
able to get everything ready and released this month. We have been
talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the end
of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
Re: Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
FYI, xbean 3.12 release is in vote.
I think it's safer to stay with Karaf 2.2.x for 4.5.0, in order to avoid
to postpone 4.5.0 for too long.
Regards
JB
On 10/03/2012 08:48 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> Given the new features that Jamie mentioned, I couldn't resist the
> temptation to at least give the upgrade to Karaf 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT a shot
> locally, but I quickly bumped into an issue with XBean: it looks like
> xbean-blueprint is currently importing Aries' Blueprint classes with a
> version range of (0.3,1.0] so we will need to get that fixed up first
> and get the ActiveMQ features descriptor updated to the new XBean
> release before we can consider moving to Karaf 2.3.0.
>
> As soon as our release has been cut, we should move to Karaf 2.3.0 to
> ensure we start ironing out these kinds of incompatibilities as soon
> as possible. For now, I'll just raise a JIRA issue to keep track of
> the required changes in XBean.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
>> Hi Gert,
>>
>> IMHO, it makes sense to release 4.5.0 with 2.2.9 as we planned some weeks
>> ago (including the CXF/ActiveMQ/Camel versions).
>>
>> As soon as Karaf 2.3.0, we can prepare a 4.6.0.
>>
>> I think it would be a good sign to the community to have new releases ;)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>>
>> On 10/03/2012 04:56 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>>
>>> L.S.,
>>>
>>>
>>> As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
>>> version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
>>> list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.9
>>> release instead.
>>>
>>> We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
>>> Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
>>> our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
>>> new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
>>> able to get everything ready and released this month. We have been
>>> talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the end
>>> of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
>>>
>>> After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
>>> Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Gert Vanthienen
>>> ------------------------
>>> FuseSource
>>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> jbonofre@apache.org
>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
Posted by Gert Vanthienen <ge...@gmail.com>.
L.S.,
Given the new features that Jamie mentioned, I couldn't resist the
temptation to at least give the upgrade to Karaf 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT a shot
locally, but I quickly bumped into an issue with XBean: it looks like
xbean-blueprint is currently importing Aries' Blueprint classes with a
version range of (0.3,1.0] so we will need to get that fixed up first
and get the ActiveMQ features descriptor updated to the new XBean
release before we can consider moving to Karaf 2.3.0.
As soon as our release has been cut, we should move to Karaf 2.3.0 to
ensure we start ironing out these kinds of incompatibilities as soon
as possible. For now, I'll just raise a JIRA issue to keep track of
the required changes in XBean.
Regards,
Gert Vanthienen
------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://fusesource.com
Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> Hi Gert,
>
> IMHO, it makes sense to release 4.5.0 with 2.2.9 as we planned some weeks
> ago (including the CXF/ActiveMQ/Camel versions).
>
> As soon as Karaf 2.3.0, we can prepare a 4.6.0.
>
> I think it would be a good sign to the community to have new releases ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 10/03/2012 04:56 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
>>
>> L.S.,
>>
>>
>> As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
>> version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
>> list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.9
>> release instead.
>>
>> We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
>> Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
>> our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
>> new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
>> able to get everything ready and released this month. We have been
>> talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the end
>> of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
>>
>> After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
>> Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Gert Vanthienen
>> ------------------------
>> FuseSource
>> Web: http://fusesource.com
>> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>>
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
Hi Gert,
IMHO, it makes sense to release 4.5.0 with 2.2.9 as we planned some
weeks ago (including the CXF/ActiveMQ/Camel versions).
As soon as Karaf 2.3.0, we can prepare a 4.6.0.
I think it would be a good sign to the community to have new releases ;)
Regards
JB
On 10/03/2012 04:56 PM, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
> version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
> list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.9
> release instead.
>
> We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
> Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
> our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
> new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
> able to get everything ready and released this month. We have been
> talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the end
> of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
>
> After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
> Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
Posted by Freeman Fang <fr...@gmail.com>.
+1 for using karaf 2.2.9 for Servicemix 4.5
Freeman
－－－－－－－－－－－－－
Freeman Fang
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Web: http://fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com/
Twitter: freemanfang
Blog: http://freemanfang.blogspot.com
http://blog.sina.com.cn/u/1473905042
weibo: http://weibo.com/u/1473905042
On 2012-10-3, at 下午10:56, Gert Vanthienen wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
> version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
> list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.9
> release instead.
>
> We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
> Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
> our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
> new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
> able to get everything ready and released this month. We have been
> talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the end
> of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
>
> After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
> Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/
Re: Using Karaf 2.2.9 for the 4.5.0 release?
Posted by "Jamie G." <ja...@gmail.com>.
The Karaf 2.3.0 RC is nearing
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF/fixforversion/12320554),
however I don't think it'll be available for at least another week
given some dependencies the project is waiting on (SMX specs 2.1).
Waiting for Karaf 2.3 will give SMX a new OSGi core rev, something I'm
sure a lot of developers will be happy to have available.
Cheers,
Jamie
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Gert Vanthienen
<ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> L.S.,
>
>
> As a preparation for the 4.5.0 release, I created JIRA issue
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SMX4-1257 - I initially picked
> version 2.3.0 of Karaf based on a recent mail by Claus on the dev@
> list, but perhaps it would be better to go with the latest Karaf 2.2.9
> release instead.
>
> We already have the NMR and Features building against that version of
> Karaf, so if we don't change that any more, we can start working on
> our 4.5.0 release as soon as ActiveMQ 5.7.0 is available - there's a
> new VOTE thread running for that at the moment, so we might even be
> able to get everything ready and released this month. We have been
> talking about doing this Apache ServiceMix 4.5.0 release since the end
> of May, so I would rather try and get it out as soon as possible.
>
> After all, we can always do a 4.6.0 release once Karaf 2.3.0 (or even
> Karaf 3.0.0) is out ;)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Gert Vanthienen
> ------------------------
> FuseSource
> Web: http://fusesource.com
> Blog: http://gertvanthienen.blogspot.com/