You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Daniel Standish <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> on 2025/01/21 16:22:22 UTC
[VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Ok as described in discussion
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1> thread
<https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>, I am
calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83 amendment
discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in Option 2
clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness constraint is
restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable. Additionally
this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections of the
option 2 clarification doc:
- Uncontroversial elements section
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements>
- Resolution of questions section
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions>
Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am Friday Jan
24 2025.
This is my +1 vote (binding).
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Daniel Standish <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
The vote passed as of 8:30am PT Jan 24 2025.
+1 binding: 8
dstandish
TP
jarek
vikram
phani
wei
pavan
amogh
+1 non-binding:
ankit
vishnu
igor
bugra
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 2:06 PM Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1, non-binding
>
> Thanks,
> Kind regards,
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:37 AM Igor Kholopov <ikholopov@google.com.invalid
> >
> wrote:
>
> > +1, non-binding
> >
> > Thank you for a thorough exploration of the problem!
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 7:47 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding from me. Looks good.
> > >
> > > Thanks & Regards,
> > > Amogh Desai
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:29 AM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ankit Chaurasia
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:49 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <
> > > > vish.chilukoori@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 non-binding
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Vishnu Chilukoori
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
> > > gopidesu@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Pavan Kumar
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Wei
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <
> > > > phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> > > > > > .invalid>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka,
> > > > > <vikram@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> +1 binding.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work
> on
> > > > this!
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <
> > jarek@potiuk.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding -
> > > committer
> > > > > > votes
> > > > > > > >> are
> > > > > > > >>> binding on that one ->
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <
> > jarek@potiuk.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>>> +1
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> > > > > > > >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>> +1 from me
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > > > > > > >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> > > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>>>> thread
> > > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > > > > >,
> > > > > > > >> I
> > > > > > > >>>>> am
> > > > > > > >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in
> > > AIP-83
> > > > > > > >>> amendment
> > > > > > > >>>>>> discussion doc <
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew
> > > > >.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further
> > refined
> > > in
> > > > > > > >> Option
> > > > > > > >>> 2
> > > > > > > >>>>>> clarification doc <
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF
> > > > > >.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that
> > > uniqueness
> > > > > > > >>>>> constraint is
> > > > > > > >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made
> > nullable.
> > > > > > > >>>>> Additionally
> > > > > > > >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these
> two
> > > > > > sections
> > > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > > > >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> > > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> > > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close
> > > > 8:30am
> > > > > > > >> Friday
> > > > > > > >>>>> Jan
> > > > > > > >>>>>> 24 2025.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> > dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Bugra Ozturk
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Buğra Öztürk <oz...@gmail.com>.
+1, non-binding
Thanks,
Kind regards,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 8:37 AM Igor Kholopov <ik...@google.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1, non-binding
>
> Thank you for a thorough exploration of the problem!
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 7:47 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding from me. Looks good.
> >
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Amogh Desai
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:29 AM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ankit Chaurasia
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:49 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <
> > > vish.chilukoori@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 non-binding
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Vishnu Chilukoori
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
> > gopidesu@apache.org
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Pavan Kumar
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Wei
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <
> > > phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> > > > > .invalid>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka,
> > > > <vikram@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> +1 binding.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on
> > > this!
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <
> jarek@potiuk.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding -
> > committer
> > > > > votes
> > > > > > >> are
> > > > > > >>> binding on that one ->
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <
> jarek@potiuk.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> +1
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> > > > > > >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> +1 from me
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > > > > > >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >>>>> thread
> > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > > > >,
> > > > > > >> I
> > > > > > >>>>> am
> > > > > > >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in
> > AIP-83
> > > > > > >>> amendment
> > > > > > >>>>>> discussion doc <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew
> > > >.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further
> refined
> > in
> > > > > > >> Option
> > > > > > >>> 2
> > > > > > >>>>>> clarification doc <
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF
> > > > >.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that
> > uniqueness
> > > > > > >>>>> constraint is
> > > > > > >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made
> nullable.
> > > > > > >>>>> Additionally
> > > > > > >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two
> > > > > sections
> > > > > > >> of
> > > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > > >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> > > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close
> > > 8:30am
> > > > > > >> Friday
> > > > > > >>>>> Jan
> > > > > > >>>>>> 24 2025.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
Bugra Ozturk
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Igor Kholopov <ik...@google.com.INVALID>.
+1, non-binding
Thank you for a thorough exploration of the problem!
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 7:47 AM Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 binding from me. Looks good.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:29 AM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ankit Chaurasia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:49 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <
> > vish.chilukoori@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 non-binding
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Vishnu Chilukoori
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <
> gopidesu@apache.org
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Pavan Kumar
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Wei
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <
> > phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> > > > .invalid>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka,
> > > <vikram@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> +1 binding.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on
> > this!
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding -
> committer
> > > > votes
> > > > > >> are
> > > > > >>> binding on that one ->
> > > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > >
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>>> +1
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> > > > > >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>
> > > > > >>>>> +1 from me
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > > > > >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > > >
> > > > > >>>>> thread
> > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > > >,
> > > > > >> I
> > > > > >>>>> am
> > > > > >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in
> AIP-83
> > > > > >>> amendment
> > > > > >>>>>> discussion doc <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew
> > >.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined
> in
> > > > > >> Option
> > > > > >>> 2
> > > > > >>>>>> clarification doc <
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF
> > > >.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that
> uniqueness
> > > > > >>>>> constraint is
> > > > > >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> > > > > >>>>> Additionally
> > > > > >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two
> > > > sections
> > > > > >> of
> > > > > >>>>> the
> > > > > >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> > > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close
> > 8:30am
> > > > > >> Friday
> > > > > >>>>> Jan
> > > > > >>>>>> 24 2025.
> > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > >>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding from me. Looks good.
Thanks & Regards,
Amogh Desai
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:29 AM Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 non-binding.
>
> Regards,
> Ankit Chaurasia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:49 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <
> vish.chilukoori@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 non-binding
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vishnu Chilukoori
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <gopidesu@apache.org
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Pavan Kumar
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Wei
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <
> phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> > > .invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka,
> > <vikram@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 binding.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on
> this!
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer
> > > votes
> > > > >> are
> > > > >>> binding on that one ->
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> +1
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> > > > >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> +1 from me
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > > > >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> > > > >>>>>> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > >
> > > > >>>>> thread
> > > > >>>>>> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > > >,
> > > > >> I
> > > > >>>>> am
> > > > >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
> > > > >>> amendment
> > > > >>>>>> discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew
> >.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in
> > > > >> Option
> > > > >>> 2
> > > > >>>>>> clarification doc <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF
> > >.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
> > > > >>>>> constraint is
> > > > >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> > > > >>>>> Additionally
> > > > >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two
> > > sections
> > > > >> of
> > > > >>>>> the
> > > > >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> > > > >>>>>> <
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close
> 8:30am
> > > > >> Friday
> > > > >>>>> Jan
> > > > >>>>>> 24 2025.
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Ankit Chaurasia <su...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding.
Regards,
Ankit Chaurasia
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:49 AM Vishnu Chilukoori <
vish.chilukoori@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non-binding
>
>
> Regards,
> Vishnu Chilukoori
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pavan Kumar
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Wei
> > >
> > > > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> > .invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 binding
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka,
> <vikram@astronomer.io.invalid
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 binding.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on this!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer
> > votes
> > > >> are
> > > >>> binding on that one ->
> > > >>>
> > >
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> > > >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> +1 from me
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > > >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> > > >>>>>> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > >
> > > >>>>> thread
> > > >>>>>> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> > >,
> > > >> I
> > > >>>>> am
> > > >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
> > > >>> amendment
> > > >>>>>> discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in
> > > >> Option
> > > >>> 2
> > > >>>>>> clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF
> >.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
> > > >>>>> constraint is
> > > >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> > > >>>>> Additionally
> > > >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two
> > sections
> > > >> of
> > > >>>>> the
> > > >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> > > >>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> > > >>>>>> <
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am
> > > >> Friday
> > > >>>>> Jan
> > > >>>>>> 24 2025.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Vishnu Chilukoori <vi...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding
Regards,
Vishnu Chilukoori
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:16 PM Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Regards,
> Pavan Kumar
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding
> >
> > Best,
> > Wei
> >
> > > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <phani.kumar@astronomer.io
> .invalid>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka, <vikram@astronomer.io.invalid
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 binding.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on this!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer
> votes
> > >> are
> > >>> binding on that one ->
> > >>>
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> > >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > >>>>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1 from me
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> > >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> >
> > >>>>> thread
> > >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1
> >,
> > >> I
> > >>>>> am
> > >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
> > >>> amendment
> > >>>>>> discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in
> > >> Option
> > >>> 2
> > >>>>>> clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
> > >>>>> constraint is
> > >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> > >>>>> Additionally
> > >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two
> sections
> > >> of
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> > >>>>>> <
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> > >>>>>> <
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am
> > >> Friday
> > >>>>> Jan
> > >>>>>> 24 2025.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Pavankumar Gopidesu <go...@apache.org>.
+1 binding
Regards,
Pavan Kumar
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025, 01:35 Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka, <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 binding.
> >>
> >> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on this!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer votes
> >> are
> >>> binding on that one ->
> >>>
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> >> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> >>>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 from me
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> >>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
> >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>
> >>>>> thread
> >>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>,
> >> I
> >>>>> am
> >>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
> >>> amendment
> >>>>>> discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in
> >> Option
> >>> 2
> >>>>>> clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
> >>>>> constraint is
> >>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> >>>>> Additionally
> >>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections
> >> of
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
> >>>>>> <
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am
> >> Friday
> >>>>> Jan
> >>>>>> 24 2025.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Wei Lee <we...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
Best,
Wei
> On Jan 22, 2025, at 9:12 AM, Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka, <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding.
>>
>> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on this!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer votes
>> are
>>> binding on that one ->
>>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
>> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
>>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 from me
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
>>>>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok as described in discussion
>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>
>>>>> thread
>>>>>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>,
>> I
>>>>> am
>>>>>> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
>>> amendment
>>>>>> discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in
>> Option
>>> 2
>>>>>> clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
>>>>> constraint is
>>>>>> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
>>>>> Additionally
>>>>>> this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections
>> of
>>>>> the
>>>>>> option 2 clarification doc:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Uncontroversial elements section
>>>>>> <
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Resolution of questions section
>>>>>> <
>>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am
>> Friday
>>>>> Jan
>>>>>> 24 2025.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is my +1 vote (binding).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Phani Kumar <ph...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 binding
On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 13:55 Vikram Koka, <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on this!
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer votes
> are
> > binding on that one ->
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung
> <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 from me
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> > On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> > >> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > Ok as described in discussion
> > >> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>
> > >> thread
> > >> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>,
> I
> > >> am
> > >> > calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> > >> >
> > >> > To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
> > amendment
> > >> > discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
> > >> >
> > >> > Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in
> Option
> > 2
> > >> > clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
> > >> >
> > >> > Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
> > >> constraint is
> > >> > restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> > >> Additionally
> > >> > this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections
> of
> > >> the
> > >> > option 2 clarification doc:
> > >> >
> > >> > - Uncontroversial elements section
> > >> > <
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> > >> >
> > >> > - Resolution of questions section
> > >> > <
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am
> Friday
> > >> Jan
> > >> > 24 2025.
> > >> >
> > >> > This is my +1 vote (binding).
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 binding.
Thank you Daniel Standish and TP for all the detailed work on this!
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:45 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer votes are
> binding on that one ->
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung <tp@astronomer.io.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 from me
> >>
> >>
> >> > On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> >> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ok as described in discussion
> >> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>
> >> thread
> >> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>, I
> >> am
> >> > calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> >> >
> >> > To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83
> amendment
> >> > discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
> >> >
> >> > Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in Option
> 2
> >> > clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
> >> >
> >> > Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
> >> constraint is
> >> > restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
> >> Additionally
> >> > this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections of
> >> the
> >> > option 2 clarification doc:
> >> >
> >> > - Uncontroversial elements section
> >> > <
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> >> >
> >> > - Resolution of questions section
> >> > <
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am Friday
> >> Jan
> >> > 24 2025.
> >> >
> >> > This is my +1 vote (binding).
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
Just to clarify - both +1s from me and TP are binding - committer votes are
binding on that one ->
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 8:42 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung <tp...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 from me
>>
>>
>> > On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
>> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok as described in discussion
>> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>
>> thread
>> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>, I
>> am
>> > calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
>> >
>> > To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83 amendment
>> > discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
>> >
>> > Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in Option 2
>> > clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
>> >
>> > Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness
>> constraint is
>> > restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable.
>> Additionally
>> > this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections of
>> the
>> > option 2 clarification doc:
>> >
>> > - Uncontroversial elements section
>> > <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
>> >
>> > - Resolution of questions section
>> > <
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
>> >
>> >
>> > Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am Friday
>> Jan
>> > 24 2025.
>> >
>> > This is my +1 vote (binding).
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 7:27 PM Tzu-ping Chung <tp...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 from me
>
>
> > On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish
> <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > Ok as described in discussion
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>
> thread
> > <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>, I am
> > calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
> >
> > To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83 amendment
> > discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
> >
> > Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in Option 2
> > clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
> >
> > Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness constraint
> is
> > restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable. Additionally
> > this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections of
> the
> > option 2 clarification doc:
> >
> > - Uncontroversial elements section
> > <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements
> >
> > - Resolution of questions section
> > <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions
> >
> >
> > Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am Friday
> Jan
> > 24 2025.
> >
> > This is my +1 vote (binding).
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Amendment to AIP-83 re uniqueness of logical date
Posted by Tzu-ping Chung <tp...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 from me
> On 22 Jan 2025, at 00:22, Daniel Standish <da...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
>
> Ok as described in discussion
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1> thread
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/l3b3t9xhmyswscclt8b2wft4dpgslky1>, I am
> calling for a vote on amendments to AIP-83.
>
> To recap, we discussed and debated various solutions in AIP-83 amendment
> discussion doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/Ngv0Ew>.
>
> Opinion coalesced around option 2, which we further refined in Option 2
> clarification doc <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/sokgF>.
>
> Formally, this proposal is to amend AIP-83 so that uniqueness constraint is
> restored on logical date and logical date is made nullable. Additionally
> this proposal includes all details documented in these two sections of the
> option 2 clarification doc:
>
> - Uncontroversial elements section
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Uncontroversialelements>
> - Resolution of questions section
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=337676722#Option2clarificationdocWIP-Resolutionofquestions>
>
> Voting will be open for 72 hours from now so, will close 8:30am Friday Jan
> 24 2025.
>
> This is my +1 vote (binding).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org