You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Peter Henderson <pe...@starjar.com> on 2013/12/18 12:09:10 UTC
Wicket 6.12 and wicket-native-websocket-javax
Is there a 6.X branch I can use which contains native javax websockets?
My git kung fu is letting me down. (Still only a white belt)
Thanks
Peter.
Re: Wicket 6.12 and wicket-native-websocket-javax
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
I think the old impl is deprecated but still there in 7.0.47.
I'll test it soon.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Peter Henderson <
peter.henderson@starjar.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Tomcat 7.0.47 back ported javax websockets from 8.
> Which means wicket-native-websocket-tomcat no longer works
> (well I couldn't get it working but I didn't try too hard)
>
>
> Wicket 7 sounds lovely.
>
>
> Many thanks
>
> Peter.
>
>
> On 18 December 2013 11:23, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov/status/364323832490110976
> >
> > The main problem is that JSR 356 API and all impls are build with JDK7,
> and
> > Wicket 6.x uses JDK 1.6 ...
> > But it seems this is not a problem for the -jetty9 module. The build
> works
> > (somehow) without problems.
> > If there are no objections from others then I can port the module to
> > wicket-6.x branch.
> >
> > But why do you prefer the -javax impl ?
> > The Wicket Native WebSocket APIs for Jetty and Tomcat are the same, the
> > only difference is the WicketFilter impl you should use.
> >
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Peter Henderson <
> > peter.henderson@starjar.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a 6.X branch I can use which contains native javax websockets?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > My git kung fu is letting me down. (Still only a white belt)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Peter.
> > >
> >
>
Re: Wicket 6.12 and wicket-native-websocket-javax
Posted by Peter Henderson <pe...@starjar.com>.
Hi Martin,
Tomcat 7.0.47 back ported javax websockets from 8.
Which means wicket-native-websocket-tomcat no longer works
(well I couldn't get it working but I didn't try too hard)
Wicket 7 sounds lovely.
Many thanks
Peter.
On 18 December 2013 11:23, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov/status/364323832490110976
>
> The main problem is that JSR 356 API and all impls are build with JDK7, and
> Wicket 6.x uses JDK 1.6 ...
> But it seems this is not a problem for the -jetty9 module. The build works
> (somehow) without problems.
> If there are no objections from others then I can port the module to
> wicket-6.x branch.
>
> But why do you prefer the -javax impl ?
> The Wicket Native WebSocket APIs for Jetty and Tomcat are the same, the
> only difference is the WicketFilter impl you should use.
>
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Peter Henderson <
> peter.henderson@starjar.com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a 6.X branch I can use which contains native javax websockets?
> >
> >
> >
> > My git kung fu is letting me down. (Still only a white belt)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Peter.
> >
>
Re: Wicket 6.12 and wicket-native-websocket-javax
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov/status/364323832490110976
The main problem is that JSR 356 API and all impls are build with JDK7, and
Wicket 6.x uses JDK 1.6 ...
But it seems this is not a problem for the -jetty9 module. The build works
(somehow) without problems.
If there are no objections from others then I can port the module to
wicket-6.x branch.
But why do you prefer the -javax impl ?
The Wicket Native WebSocket APIs for Jetty and Tomcat are the same, the
only difference is the WicketFilter impl you should use.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Peter Henderson <
peter.henderson@starjar.com> wrote:
> Is there a 6.X branch I can use which contains native javax websockets?
>
>
>
> My git kung fu is letting me down. (Still only a white belt)
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter.
>