You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Robert P. J. Day" <rp...@mindspring.com> on 2003/04/11 02:04:01 UTC
which batik should i use with fop 20.5rc2?
i'm aware that the latest FOP comes with its own
batik.jar file. i just happened to already have the
latest batik on my system, so i thought i could just
use that instead.
when i tried to run a simple FOP example, i got the
java error for an undefined class:
org/apache/batik/util/XMLResourceDescriptor
sure enough, it looks like that class might be in
the fop-associated batik.jar file, but it certainly
doesn't look like it comes in *any* of the jar files
with the latest batik distribution.
can someone clarify what the compatibility is
between FOP and batik regarding versions and jar
files?
thanks.
rday
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: which batik should i use with fop 20.5rc2?
Posted by "Robert P. J. Day" <rp...@mindspring.com>.
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Sherlane Lam wrote:
> > I am using 20.4 version. Then, which batik version
> > should I use? Can I use the batik 1.1.1 download from
> > apache?
>
> No. Both with 0.20.4 and 0.20.5rc1 you'll *have* to use
> the batik.jar distributed with FOP.
> I think 0.20.5rc2 will work with batik 1.5beta5 but i may
> be mistaken.
ok, i've just confirmed that fop...rc2 does not work with
the latest batik1.5beta5. with the batik.jar file that comes
with fop, i could do a simple example that comes with the
fop distribution -- table.fo -> table.pdf.
when i put the batik beta jar files into the class path,
i get an exception.
rday
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: which batik should i use with fop 20.5rc2?
Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Sherlane Lam wrote:
> I am using 20.4 version. Then, which batik version
> should I use? Can I use the batik 1.1.1 download from
> apache?
No. Both with 0.20.4 and 0.20.5rc1 you'll *have* to use
the batik.jar distributed with FOP.
I think 0.20.5rc2 will work with batik 1.5beta5 but i may
be mistaken.
No version of FOP will work with batik 1.5beta4.
Only older FOP releases will work with batik 1.1.1.
J.Pietschmann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: which batik should i use with fop 20.5rc2?
Posted by "Robert P. J. Day" <rp...@mindspring.com>.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Sherlane Lam wrote:
> I also have the same question.
>
> I am using 20.4 version. Then, which batik version
> should I use? Can I use the batik 1.1.1 download from
> apache?
actually, i just answered my own question. from the
most recent batik beta, i had just forgotten to add the
jar files under the lib/ directory to my classpath.
it might be overkill, but there are a *bunch* of jar files
that come with batik. i'm sure most of them are optional,
but i added them all anyway.
rday
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org
Re: which batik should i use with fop 20.5rc2?
Posted by Sherlane Lam <sh...@yahoo.com>.
I also have the same question.
I am using 20.4 version. Then, which batik version
should I use? Can I use the batik 1.1.1 download from
apache?
Thanks
Sherlane
--- "Robert P. J. Day" <rp...@mindspring.com> wrote:
>
> i'm aware that the latest FOP comes with its own
> batik.jar file. i just happened to already have the
> latest batik on my system, so i thought i could just
> use that instead.
>
> when i tried to run a simple FOP example, i got
> the
> java error for an undefined class:
>
> org/apache/batik/util/XMLResourceDescriptor
>
> sure enough, it looks like that class might be in
> the fop-associated batik.jar file, but it certainly
> doesn't look like it comes in *any* of the jar files
> with the latest batik distribution.
>
> can someone clarify what the compatibility is
> between FOP and batik regarding versions and jar
> files?
>
> thanks.
>
> rday
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> fop-user-help@xml.apache.org
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more
http://tax.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-user-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-user-help@xml.apache.org