You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2007/01/04 21:58:58 UTC
Re: svn commit: r492633 - /geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
Why were these deleted? This is soo retarded IMO...
If we are going to be using the specs/trunk as a some transient place
for specs to live, then it should be completely removed, and each
spec should get its own trunk/branches/tags and be treated like a
normal project.
Moving stuff in and out of trunk on some ethereal whim is a horrible
plan.
--jason
On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:51 AM, adc@apache.org wrote:
> Author: adc
> Date: Thu Jan 4 08:51:02 2007
> New Revision: 492633
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492633
> Log:
> GERONIMO-2692 Removed missing modules
>
> Modified:
> geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml?
> view=diff&rev=492633&r1=492632&r2=492633
> ======================================================================
> ========
> --- geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jan 4 08:51:02 2007
> @@ -120,13 +120,10 @@
> </activation>
>
> <modules>
> - <module>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</module>
> <module>geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec</module>
> <module>geronimo-el_1.0_spec</module>
> - <module>geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec</module>
> <module>geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec</module>
> <module>geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec</module>
> - <module>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</module>
> <module>geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec</module>
> <module>geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec</module>
> </modules>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r492633 - /geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Donald Woods <dr...@yahoo.com>.
G2692 was to fix the fact that specs/trunk would not build as it existed
today. There was a long email discussion about tagging and releasing
the specs, which I didn't contribute to as I'm not a committer....
I agree, that this whole specs directory layout and handling is a pain
for any people/groups outside of the core Geronimo developers to follow.
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Why were these deleted? This is soo retarded IMO...
>
> If we are going to be using the specs/trunk as a some transient place
> for specs to live, then it should be completely removed, and each spec
> should get its own trunk/branches/tags and be treated like a normal
> project.
>
> Moving stuff in and out of trunk on some ethereal whim is a horrible plan.
>
> --jason
>
>
> On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:51 AM, adc@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Author: adc
>> Date: Thu Jan 4 08:51:02 2007
>> New Revision: 492633
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492633
>> Log:
>> GERONIMO-2692 Removed missing modules
>>
>> Modified:
>> geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=492633&r1=492632&r2=492633
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>>
>> --- geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jan 4 08:51:02 2007
>> @@ -120,13 +120,10 @@
>> </activation>
>>
>> <modules>
>> - <module>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</module>
>> <module>geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec</module>
>> <module>geronimo-el_1.0_spec</module>
>> - <module>geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec</module>
>> <module>geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec</module>
>> <module>geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec</module>
>> - <module>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</module>
>> <module>geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec</module>
>> <module>geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec</module>
>> </modules>
>>
>>
>
>
>