You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@taverna.apache.org by "Stian Soiland-Reyes (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/07 11:17:12 UTC
[jira] [Created] (TAVERNA-968) Update/remove custom
executeworkflow.sh in Taverna Server
Stian Soiland-Reyes created TAVERNA-968:
-------------------------------------------
Summary: Update/remove custom executeworkflow.sh in Taverna Server
Key: TAVERNA-968
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-968
Project: Apache Taverna
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Taverna Commandline, Taverna Server
Reporter: Stian Soiland-Reyes
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: commandline 3.1.0
https://builds.apache.org/user/stain/my-views/view/taverna/job/incubator-taverna-server/136/console
failed with
{code}
[INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (improve-registry-coverage) @ taverna-server-webapp ---
Error: Unable to access jarfile /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/incubator-taverna-server/taverna-server-webapp/target/TavernaServer.3.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/util/taverna-command-line-3.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/lib/taverna-command-line-0.1.1.jar
{code}
It seems there is a custom executeworkflow.sh in
https://github.com/apache/incubator-taverna-server/blob/master/taverna-server-webapp/src/main/replacementscripts/executeworkflow.sh
Do we still need that? in which case the path should be updated to the equivalent of {{lib/org.apache.taverna.commandline.taverna-commandline-api-3.1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar}}
Or should we not rather add whatever special it adds to the "proper" executeworkflow.sh in Taverna Command Line now before the release? (I've set this as a blocker for the 3.1.0 Command Line)
Is it lines like this?
{code}
RUNID_PROP=
if test x != "x$TAVERNA_RUN_ID"; then
RUNID_PROP="-Dtaverna.runid=$TAVERNA_RUN_ID"
fi
INTERACTION_PROPS=-Dtaverna.interaction.ignore_requests=true
{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)