[jira] [Commented] (CTAKES-121) cTakes distribution zip includes ctakes-resources-umls2011ab...jar in lib/

["ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14032466#comment-14032466 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CTAKES-121:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 1602878 from chenpei@apache.org in branch 'ctakes/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1602878 ]

CTAKES-297 - DictionaryLookupAnnotatorUMLS.xml still had a Lucene impl config.  Updating to use default jdbc (hsqldb).
CTAKES-121 - We no longer need to copy resources for most of the projects now, can be read directly from the jars.

> cTakes distribution zip includes ctakes-resources-umls2011ab...jar in lib/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CTAKES-121
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-121
>             Project: cTAKES
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ctakes-dictionary-lookup
>    Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Sean Finan
>              Labels: build, maven, newbie
>             Fix For: 3.2.0
>
>
> The Dictionary Lookup resources/ directory in the dictionary lookup target classes, and seems to work just fine with Lucene.
> In the ctakes-distribution target, the lib/ directory has ctakes-resources-2011ab...jar.
> Since the ...2011ab...jar is in the classpath, and the ...2011ab...jar has OrangeBook/ in it, and Lucene does not seem to play well with jars, and since OrangeBook is used even with -plaintext-, and since I can't be the only developer that has unzipped the distribution to test it, and just in case the distributable that we put on the apache downloads page comes directly from the maven packaging:
> ctakes-resources-umls2011ab...jar should not be placed in the ctakes-distribution package.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)