You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by Dennis Kubes <ku...@apache.org> on 2008/02/23 16:24:44 UTC
Failing Hudson Builds
As far as I can tell, then failing hudson builds are due to the whoami
command either not being on the hudson box or not being accessible to
the user running the nutch builds. Does anyone know what the next step
is here?
Dennis
Re: Failing Hudson Builds
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Oops, you're right. I inadvertently set the JDK to 1.6. Testing now
with JDK 1.5.
Nige
On Feb 27, 2008, at 6:54 AM, Dennis Kubes wrote:
> Under java 1.6 is it just a filepath issue. I tracked it down some
> time ago. I can fix it.
>
> Dennis
>
> Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
>> Nigel Daley wrote:
>>> Hmm, whoami is on the machine. I've changed the Nutch builds so
>>> it now runs a script (running the same ant command it was
>>> running) and I source the hudson user environment.
>>>
>>> The build is now failing because of this test:
>>>
>>> test:
>>> [echo] Testing plugin: parse-swf
>>> [junit] Running org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser
>>> [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
>>> 1.764 sec
>>> [junit] Test org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser FAILED
>> This is using Java 1.6, right? There's a bug somewhere, either in
>> the JavaSWF library or in the ActionScript parser that this plugin
>> uses, which causes the output to become re-arranged under Java 1.6
>> vs. Java 1.5. I wasn't able to track this down yet.
Re: Failing Hudson Builds
Posted by Dennis Kubes <ku...@apache.org>.
Under java 1.6 is it just a filepath issue. I tracked it down some time
ago. I can fix it.
Dennis
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> Nigel Daley wrote:
>> Hmm, whoami is on the machine. I've changed the Nutch builds so it
>> now runs a script (running the same ant command it was running) and I
>> source the hudson user environment.
>>
>> The build is now failing because of this test:
>>
>> test:
>> [echo] Testing plugin: parse-swf
>> [junit] Running org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser
>> [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.764 sec
>> [junit] Test org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser FAILED
>
>
> This is using Java 1.6, right? There's a bug somewhere, either in the
> JavaSWF library or in the ActionScript parser that this plugin uses,
> which causes the output to become re-arranged under Java 1.6 vs. Java
> 1.5. I wasn't able to track this down yet.
>
>
Re: Failing Hudson Builds
Posted by Andrzej Bialecki <ab...@getopt.org>.
Nigel Daley wrote:
> Hmm, whoami is on the machine. I've changed the Nutch builds so it now
> runs a script (running the same ant command it was running) and I source
> the hudson user environment.
>
> The build is now failing because of this test:
>
> test:
> [echo] Testing plugin: parse-swf
> [junit] Running org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser
> [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.764 sec
> [junit] Test org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser FAILED
This is using Java 1.6, right? There's a bug somewhere, either in the
JavaSWF library or in the ActionScript parser that this plugin uses,
which causes the output to become re-arranged under Java 1.6 vs. Java
1.5. I wasn't able to track this down yet.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com
Re: Failing Hudson Builds
Posted by Nigel Daley <nd...@yahoo-inc.com>.
Hmm, whoami is on the machine. I've changed the Nutch builds so it
now runs a script (running the same ant command it was running) and I
source the hudson user environment.
The build is now failing because of this test:
test:
[echo] Testing plugin: parse-swf
[junit] Running org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser
[junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed:
1.764 sec
[junit] Test org.apache.nutch.parse.swf.TestSWFParser FAILED
FWIW, the output of this test (and perhaps others) is not being
picked up by Hudson. Hudson is grabbing build/test/*.xml
Nige
On Feb 24, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Sami Siren wrote:
>
> Dennis Kubes wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, then failing hudson builds are due to the
>> whoami command either not being on the hudson box or not being
>> accessible to the user running the nutch builds. Does anyone know
>> what the next step is here?
> I agree with your analysis.
>
> Nigel, do you know if is it possible to add the missing 'whoami'
> command to the hudson zone or what is the process of getting it there?
>
> --
> Sami Siren
>
Re: Failing Hudson Builds
Posted by Sami Siren <ss...@gmail.com>.
Dennis Kubes wrote:
> As far as I can tell, then failing hudson builds are due to the whoami
> command either not being on the hudson box or not being accessible to
> the user running the nutch builds. Does anyone know what the next
> step is here?
I agree with your analysis.
Nigel, do you know if is it possible to add the missing 'whoami' command
to the hudson zone or what is the process of getting it there?
--
Sami Siren