You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> on 2006/05/26 02:18:45 UTC
[VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
this new version.
The candidate distribution can be found at
http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
Thanks
--
Jeremy
On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a
> >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there:
> >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259
> >>
> >>
> >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator release
> >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation
> >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the
> >> distributions at
> >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>,
> >>
> >> give us
> >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything.
> >
> >
> > (non-binding)
> >
> > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time):
> >
> > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the
> > LICENSE.txt. they
> > don't effect the meaning.
> > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING ISSUES.
> > might
> > be good to list M1 in the release status
> > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not fully
> > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'.
> >
> > one slightly more serious point:
> >
> > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed artifacts
> > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't
> > contain
> > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar repository
> > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read
> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include
> > LICENSE
> > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory).
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains maven 1
> > snippets.
> >
> > but overall not bad :-)
> >
> > - robert
> >
> Robert,
>
> Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the
> updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/.
>
> I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
> updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200605.mbox/%3c4471F73A.2060800@apache.org%3e.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me (binding)
-- dims
On 5/25/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
>
> We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> this new version.
> The candidate distribution can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
>
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a
> > >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there:
> > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator release
> > >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation
> > >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the
> > >> distributions at
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>,
> > >>
> > >> give us
> > >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything.
> > >
> > >
> > > (non-binding)
> > >
> > > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time):
> > >
> > > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the
> > > LICENSE.txt. they
> > > don't effect the meaning.
> > > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING ISSUES.
> > > might
> > > be good to list M1 in the release status
> > > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not fully
> > > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'.
> > >
> > > one slightly more serious point:
> > >
> > > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed artifacts
> > > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't
> > > contain
> > > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar repository
> > > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include
> > > LICENSE
> > > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory).
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains maven 1
> > > snippets.
> > >
> > > but overall not bad :-)
> > >
> > > - robert
> > >
> > Robert,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the
> > updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/.
> >
> > I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
> > updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200605.mbox/%3c4471F73A.2060800@apache.org%3e.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Sebastien
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Paul Fremantle <pz...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Paul
On 5/26/06, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> Looks OK to me. +1
>
> On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>
> > We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> > Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> > http://article.gmane.org/
> > gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
> >
> > We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> > this new version.
> > The candidate distribution can be found at
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> >> > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi!
> >> >>
> >> >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a
> >> >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there:
> >> >> http://article.gmane.org/
> >> gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator
> >> release
> >> >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation
> >> >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the
> >> >> distributions at
> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http://
> >> people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>,
> >> >>
> >> >> give us
> >> >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > (non-binding)
> >> >
> >> > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time):
> >> >
> >> > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the
> >> > LICENSE.txt. they
> >> > don't effect the meaning.
> >> > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING
> >> ISSUES.
> >> > might
> >> > be good to list M1 in the release status
> >> > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not
> >> fully
> >> > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'.
> >> >
> >> > one slightly more serious point:
> >> >
> >> > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed
> >> artifacts
> >> > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't
> >> > contain
> >> > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar
> >> repository
> >> > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read
> >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include
> >> > LICENSE
> >> > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory).
> >> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains
> >> maven 1
> >> > snippets.
> >> >
> >> > but overall not bad :-)
> >> >
> >> > - robert
> >> >
> >> Robert,
> >>
> >> Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA
> >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the
> >> updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-
> >> incubating-M1/.
> >>
> >> I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
> >> updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there:
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/
> >> 200605.mbox/%3c4471F73A.2060800@apache.org%3e.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Sebastien
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com
"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Looks OK to me. +1
On May 25, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.org/
> gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
>
> We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> this new version.
> The candidate distribution can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
>
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a
>> >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there:
>> >> http://article.gmane.org/
>> gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator
>> release
>> >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation
>> >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the
>> >> distributions at
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http://
>> people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>,
>> >>
>> >> give us
>> >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything.
>> >
>> >
>> > (non-binding)
>> >
>> > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time):
>> >
>> > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the
>> > LICENSE.txt. they
>> > don't effect the meaning.
>> > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING
>> ISSUES.
>> > might
>> > be good to list M1 in the release status
>> > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not
>> fully
>> > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'.
>> >
>> > one slightly more serious point:
>> >
>> > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed
>> artifacts
>> > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't
>> > contain
>> > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar
>> repository
>> > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read
>> > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include
>> > LICENSE
>> > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory).
>> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains
>> maven 1
>> > snippets.
>> >
>> > but overall not bad :-)
>> >
>> > - robert
>> >
>> Robert,
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the
>> updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-
>> incubating-M1/.
>>
>> I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
>> updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/
>> 200605.mbox/%3c4471F73A.2060800@apache.org%3e.
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Sebastien
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On 5/31/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 5/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> > We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> > Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
> >
> > We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> > this new version.
> > The candidate distribution can be found at
> > http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
> >
> > Thanks
> > --
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hi!
> > > >>
> > > >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a
> > > >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there:
> > > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator release
> > > >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation
> > > >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the
> > > >> distributions at
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>,
> > > >>
> > > >> give us
> > > >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time):
> > > >
> > > > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the
> > > > LICENSE.txt. they
> > > > don't effect the meaning.
> > > > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING ISSUES.
> > > > might
> > > > be good to list M1 in the release status
> > > > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not fully
> > > > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'.
> > > >
> > > > one slightly more serious point:
> > > >
> > > > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed artifacts
> > > > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't
> > > > contain
> > > > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar repository
> > > > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read
> > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include
> > > > LICENSE
> > > > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory).
> > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains maven 1
> > > > snippets.
> > > >
> > > > but overall not bad :-)
> > > >
> > > > - robert
> > > >
> > > Robert,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the
> > > updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/.
> > >
> > > I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
> > > updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there:
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200605.mbox/%3c4471F73A.2060800@apache.org%3e.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Sebastien
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
On 5/26/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
>
> We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> this new version.
> The candidate distribution can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
>
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
>
> On 5/22/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > > On 5/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <js...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi!
> > >>
> > >> I have initiated a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a
> > >> release of Tuscany. The vote email thread is available there:
> > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3259
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> We have read the Apache release guidelines and the incubator release
> > >> policy, but this is the first time that we are doing an incubation
> > >> release so I would appreciate if you could take a look at the
> > >> distributions at
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/>,
> > >>
> > >> give us
> > >> feedback and let us know if we need to fix anything.
> > >
> > >
> > > (non-binding)
> > >
> > > a few little nits (nothing serious, more FYI for next time):
> > >
> > > 1 there are some encoding issues down at the bottom of the
> > > LICENSE.txt. they
> > > don't effect the meaning.
> > > 2 STATUS seems like it might be a little outdated re:PENDING ISSUES.
> > > might
> > > be good to list M1 in the release status
> > > 3 MANIFEST files lack a Implementation-Vendor-Id and so are not fully
> > > complient. it's conventional to use 'org.apache'.
> > >
> > > one slightly more serious point:
> > >
> > > 4 the tuscany jar's don't contain NOTICE files. all distributed artifacts
> > > *must* contain these LICENSE and NOTICE files. if these jars don't
> > > contain
> > > these files then they cannot be released via the apache jar repository
> > > (which is mirrored to the maven repository on ibiblio). read
> > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html. it's traditional to include
> > > LICENSE
> > > and NOTICE files within META-INF (but that's not mandatory).
> > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/prepare.html contains maven 1
> > > snippets.
> > >
> > > but overall not bad :-)
> > >
> > > - robert
> > >
> > Robert,
> >
> > Thanks for your feedback. I fixed the issues you reported (see JIRA
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-414) and uploaded the
> > updated files to http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/.
> >
> > I also started a new vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish the
> > updated distribution. The vote email thread is available there:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200605.mbox/%3c4471F73A.2060800@apache.org%3e.
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Sebastien
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On 5/31/06, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> Please check with Cliff that your understanding regarding Rhino distribution
> as you explained it to Bill's objection is correct. Not to hold up the
> release, since you've documented the license and are in the Incubator, but
> just to be sure for your future development.
>
There may be a bigger issue here. Although most projects from
mozilla.org have been relicensed under MPL it appears that Rhino is an
exception and is still under NPL1.1:
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/relicensing-faq.html#to-be-relicensed
NPL1.1 is one of the "exceptions" on Chris's list that was originally
banned but which was going to be reviewed. Has such a review taken
place and if so what was the outcome?
To be on the safe side, I'm going to propose that we remove the Rhino
jar from the distribution and update the NOTICE files etc. with
information for users on where it can be downloaded from and under
what terms. Do we need another IPMC vote after such a change or is
lazy consensus acceptable?
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> Passed with +1's from dims, jim, pzf, stoddard, jstrachan and no -1's.
Please check with Cliff that your understanding regarding Rhino distribution
as you explained it to Bill's objection is correct. Not to hold up the
release, since you've documented the license and are in the Incubator, but
just to be sure for your future development.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On 5/25/06, Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org> wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
>
> We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> this new version.
> The candidate distribution can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
>
Passed with +1's from dims, jim, pzf, stoddard, jstrachan and no -1's.
Thanks to everyone for reviewing and voting.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Jeremy Boynes <jb...@apache.org>.
On 5/30/06, Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com> wrote:
>
> I just noticed this distribution redistributes (unmodified?)the MPL 1.1 licensed Rhino JavaScript engine. MPL
> 1.1 is significantly more restrictive than the AL 2. Is this a concern?
>
MPL1.1 is on Chris's list as a "Class B" license which AIUI is OK to
distribute in binary form. The artifact we are redistributing is the
unmodified binary so I believe we are OK.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Bill Stoddard wrote:
> Jeremy Boynes wrote:
>> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
>> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
>>
>> We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
>> this new version.
>> The candidate distribution can be found at
>> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Jeremy
>
> +1
>
> Bill
I just noticed this distribution redistributes (unmodified?)the MPL 1.1 licensed Rhino JavaScript engine. MPL
1.1 is significantly more restrictive than the AL 2. Is this a concern?
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Jeremy Boynes wrote:
> We voted on tuscany-dev on a revised version that addresses the issues
> Robert raised below and the results can be viewed at
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.webservices.tuscany.devel/3403
>
> We would like to request approval from the Incubator PMC to release
> this new version.
> The candidate distribution can be found at
> http://people.apache.org/~jsdelfino/test-incubating-M1/
>
> Thanks
> --
> Jeremy
+1
Bill
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org