You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2025/10/23 00:23:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-18692) User in staticPriorities cost also shouldn't be accumulated to totalDecayedCallCost and totalRawCallCost.

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18692?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18032308#comment-18032308 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-18692:
-----------------------------------------

github-actions[bot] commented on PR #5538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5538#issuecomment-3434644723

   We're closing this stale PR because it has been open for 100 days with no activity. This isn't a judgement on the merit of the PR in any way. It's just a way of keeping the PR queue manageable.
   If you feel like this was a mistake, or you would like to continue working on it, please feel free to re-open it and ask for a committer to remove the stale tag and review again.
   Thanks all for your contribution.




> User in staticPriorities cost also shouldn't be accumulated to totalDecayedCallCost and totalRawCallCost.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-18692
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18692
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: common
>            Reporter: Chenyu Zheng
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> After HADOOP-17165, we can avoid to restrict some important user who has many request.
> In HADOOP-17346, the solution is similar to HADOOP-17165, but the user is service user. And another improvement in HADOOP-17346 is that we can avoid backoff by response time. 
> HADOOP-17280 solve the problem "Service-user cost shouldn't be accumulated to totalDecayedCallCost and totalRawCallCost." for HADOOP-17165. HADOOP-17346 also fix it.
> I think some code is redundancy, we should reconstruct. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org