You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to infrastructure-dev@apache.org by Rahul <rs...@xebia.com> on 2012/07/08 05:49:54 UTC
Re: July Board Report Draft
Guys,
I am migrating MAHOUT from confluence wiki to the new CMS. I see a tool
that can facilitate this, available at :
https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/cms/conversion-utilities/cwiki.
But this would require a auto exporter file for MAHOUT. People in the
MAHOUT mailing list are not completely aware of how to locate this file.
Can someone let me know where I would find this file ?
regards
Rahul
08-07-2012 01:04, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I don't have much experience with the Confluence
> migration tools- he might ask on site-dev@apache.org
> or infrastructure@apache.org or infrastructure-dev@apache.org
> for help from folks who have used it. Ross Gardler
> or Nick Burch might be better contacts.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Sean Owen <sr...@apache.org>
> *To:* rsharma@xebia.com; joe_schaefer@yahoo.com
> *Sent:* Saturday, July 7, 2012 3:30 PM
> *Subject:* Re: July Board Report Draft
>
> Joe, Rahul is trying to work on moving Mahout's Confluence wiki to the
> CMS. He's got a question below -- not sure anyone in the project
> knows. Is this relevant and can you help him find this template?
>
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Rahul <rsharma@xebia.com
> <ma...@xebia.com>> wrote:
> > I see there is a conversion tool to do available at
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/cms/conversion-utilities/cwiki/.
> > But that would require an auto export template for Mahout. Where
> can I get
> > this one ?
> >
> >
> > On 06-07-2012 21:45, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Sean Owen<srowen@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> As I understand it, the task is to get everything in
> Confluence into
> >>> the new CMS system.
> >>>
> >> Sounds right.
> >>
> >> There is a deadline as well when Confluence will be more than
> deprecated.
> >>
> >> ...
> >>>
> >>> I think it's mostly mechanical (?) as they use the same
> markdown (?).
> >>>
> >> As with all "just mechanical" projects, there will be gotchas.
> I don't
> >> expect big issues since we have the advantage of being laggards.
> >>
> >>
> >>> Sounds like a question of making the skeleton template site
> and then
> >>> finding a way to suck in the wiki pages as easily as possible,
> and get
> >>> some semblance of the same thing to build in this CMS system.
> >>>
> >> Sounds right.
> >>
> >
>
>