You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2013/10/21 23:09:41 UTC
Re: RP_MATCHES_RCVD
On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Giving this rule positive value would uselessly add score to correct mail,
> but any negative score increases possibility of false negative.
>
> I don't think this should have any score, imho __RP_MATCHES_RCVD for meta
> rules is just enough. It can be T_ rule if anyone wants, imho.
Any strong opinions on dropping RP_MATCHES_RCVD in favor of a subrule?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
508 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
Re: RP_MATCHES_RCVD
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 14:09 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>>> Giving this rule positive value would uselessly add score to correct mail,
>>> but any negative score increases possibility of false negative.
>>>
>>> I don't think this should have any score, imho __RP_MATCHES_RCVD for meta
>>> rules is just enough. It can be T_ rule if anyone wants, imho.
>>
>> Any strong opinions on dropping RP_MATCHES_RCVD in favor of a subrule?
>
> +1 Go for it.
If nobody objects by Friday I'll pull it out.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Perfect Security and Absolute Safety are unattainable; beware
those who would try to sell them to you, regardless of the cost,
for they are trying to sell you your own slavery.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
509 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
Re: RP_MATCHES_RCVD
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Mon, 2013-10-21 at 14:09 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > Giving this rule positive value would uselessly add score to correct mail,
> > but any negative score increases possibility of false negative.
> >
> > I don't think this should have any score, imho __RP_MATCHES_RCVD for meta
> > rules is just enough. It can be T_ rule if anyone wants, imho.
>
> Any strong opinions on dropping RP_MATCHES_RCVD in favor of a subrule?
+1 Go for it.
There've been repeated complaints (read: reports) about that rule and
its negative score the last few weeks on lists.
Kind of ironic that RP_MATCHES_RCVD -0.8 counters neutral BAYES_50 +0.8.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}