You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@nifi.apache.org by "Joseph Witt (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/29 16:36:04 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (NIFI-796) ...processors.standard.ControlRate
Inconsitency between documentation and code
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Joseph Witt updated NIFI-796:
-----------------------------
Labels: beginner (was: )
> ...processors.standard.ControlRate Inconsitency between documentation and code
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-796
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Extensions
> Reporter: Dan S
> Priority: Trivial
> Labels: beginner
> Fix For: 0.3.0
>
>
> On lines 81-83 for the description of RATE_CONTROL_ATTRIBUTE_NAME
> it states
> "The name of an attribute whose values build toward the rate limit if Rate
> Control Criteria is set to 'attribute value'. "+ "The value of the
> attribute referenced by this property must be a positive integer, or the
> FlowFile will be routed to failure. "+ "This value is ignored if Rate
> Control Criteria is not set to 'attribute value'. Changing this value
> resets the rate counters."
> Yes on line 257 it is parsed as a long. Hence the comment on lines 81-83
> should indicate a positive long instead of positive integer.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)