You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to c-dev@xerces.apache.org by da...@interfold.com on 2009/10/02 00:02:40 UTC
Was "native" encoding removed from Xerces 3?
When building Xerces 3.0.1 I noticed that using "native" encoding is no
longer an option. Was it removed from Xerces 3.0.1?
Do I need to download and install ICU if I chose that option or is it part
of the Xerces 3.x distribution?
All of the sample test programs (ran with "gmake check") ran fine after
building with the ICU option and not doing anything extra to build or
install ICU. Do the samples need ICU?
Thanks,
David.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org
Re: Was "native" encoding removed from Xerces 3?
Posted by David Bertoni <db...@apache.org>.
davidhinz@interfold.com wrote:
> When building Xerces 3.0.1 I noticed that using "native" encoding is no
> longer an option. Was it removed from Xerces 3.0.1?
No. It's just detected automatically.
>
> Do I need to download and install ICU if I chose that option or is it part
> of the Xerces 3.x distribution?
Whether you need to download, build, and install it depends on your
platform. Some Unix and Linux distributions include it in the default
install, or as an extra package you can install. It's not included in
the Xerces-C distribution.
The configure script has a help option that will show you the various
flags and their options.
>
> All of the sample test programs (ran with "gmake check") ran fine after
> building with the ICU option and not doing anything extra to build or
> install ICU. Do the samples need ICU?
No.
Dave
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xerces.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xerces.apache.org