You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Ignacio Vera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/08/20 10:17:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-7934) PlanetObject Interface

Ignacio Vera created LUCENE-7934:
------------------------------------

             Summary: PlanetObject Interface
                 Key: LUCENE-7934
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7934
             Project: Lucene - Core
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: modules/spatial3d
            Reporter: Ignacio Vera


Hi [~daddywri],

I propose to add a new interface call PlanetObject which all shapes should implement. It is actually extracted from class BasePlanetObject. The motivation is that currently the method getPlanetModel() is not visible and therefore there is no possibility to know to which PlanetModel a shape belongs to. 

The side effect for this change is that the constructors for composite shapes change as they need to be created with a PlanetModel. I think this is correct as then we can check the planet model when adding a shape and make sure all objects in a composite belongs to the same Planet model.

In addition, we check that two shape belongs to the shape Planet model when calling getRelationship(GeoShape geoShape).  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org