[ACS41] Status

[Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>]

Hi all,

I'm not going to cut the RC today, due to the outstanding bugs that we
are still working on.

Let's keep pushing to get things wrapped up.  I've been trying to get
review requests *with my name on them* and / or "Patch Request" emails
done as soon as I can... keep them coming!

-chip

Re: [ACS41] Status

[Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com>]

1006 I just closed, it ended up being a duplicate of a bug recently fixed.

431 references old stuff that doesn't seem to say much any more (or I
can't reach), but I believe it's about trying to bring up a zone when
you have a bunch of hosts. The management server can't handle all of
the agents connecting. The workaround was to increase your number of
worker threads, or bring up your agents in a rolling fashion. I'm not
familiar with how to fix this or where.

155 sounds like something that needs to be fixed, but probably not a blocker.

On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 1:24 PM, prasanna <ts...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 23 March 2013 00:19, Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm not going to cut the RC today, due to the outstanding bugs that we
>> are still working on.
>>
>> Let's keep pushing to get things wrapped up.  I've been trying to get
>> review requests *with my name on them* and / or "Patch Request" emails
>> done as soon as I can... keep them coming!
>>
>> -chip
>
> I went through all the Major bugs to check if we possibly mis-triaged
> an important bug. The following seem important to fix but I'll let the
> owners take a call:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-155
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-431
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1006
>
> All of them are KVM related.

Re: [ACS41] Status

[prasanna <ts...@apache.org>]

On 23 March 2013 00:19, Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not going to cut the RC today, due to the outstanding bugs that we
> are still working on.
>
> Let's keep pushing to get things wrapped up.  I've been trying to get
> review requests *with my name on them* and / or "Patch Request" emails
> done as soon as I can... keep them coming!
>
> -chip

I went through all the Major bugs to check if we possibly mis-triaged
an important bug. The following seem important to fix but I'll let the
owners take a call:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-155
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-431
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1006

All of them are KVM related.

Re: [ACS41] Status

[Kelven Yang <ke...@citrix.com>]

Please wait until the fix for CLOUDSTACK-1795 is in. The fix will finalize
on how Spring to fully work with legacy CloudStack AOP semantics (@DB
interception/@ActionEvent interception).

Out-of-box Spring AOP offering uses proxy mode that can not fully support
the semantics we used in legacy CloudStack codebase. I've worked out a
customized AOP solution that can balance Spring and the legacy. I'll try
to make the fix work by the end of Monday PST time if there are no other
urgent things.

Kelven



On 3/22/13 11:49 AM, "Chip Childers" <ch...@sungard.com> wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I'm not going to cut the RC today, due to the outstanding bugs that we
>are still working on.
>
>Let's keep pushing to get things wrapped up.  I've been trying to get
>review requests *with my name on them* and / or "Patch Request" emails
>done as soon as I can... keep them coming!
>
>-chip